Cite Image :solidcolours, Istock

News | Home News | Local News

In a news story by By TED JEORY 00:00, Sun, Dec 11, 2011 it was said Social workers ‘sex up abuse claims to snatch children for adoption’ SOCIAL workers are regularly “sexing up” dossiers on problem parents to remove children into care and even to farm them out for adoption, a whistleblower reveals today. https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/289232/Social-workers-sex-up-abuse-claims-to-snatch-children-for-adoption.

It should be noted this the same year Emily was abducted by force Emily from her court appointed bi-weekly meetings with her father after she was removed from her mother’s care. Is it no wonder she was torn away from this meeting crying dragged out by an unlawful Social Worker with criminal intent?

“This Is Still Happening On A Daily Basis!”

The experienced social worker in Southern England who shared with a Sunday Express investigation the troubling reality of council managers exerting pressure on him and his colleagues to rewrite reports that are perceived as “too positive.” This distressing situation involves the demand for “more dirt” on parents, aiming to enhance the likelihood of obtaining court orders to place their children in care. These actions not only impact families but also serve to elevate councils’ Ofsted ratings. the Express Whistle blower is alleged by the Express the worry of having another Baby Peter Conoly on an authority’s hands had created a climate of fear that was destroying innocent families. He said These psychologists create such a high standard of for parenting that most of us would fail. The findings were last night described as a “national scandal” by one Lib Dem John Henning MP who was demanding a full Parliamentary inquiry into Britain’s child protection system.

Nishra Mansuri, of the British Association of Social Workers, expressed deep concern regarding the whistleblower’s comments, emphasizing the significant impact of budget cuts on social workers. She highlighted that the heightened pressure stemming from these cuts has led to a situation where crucial decision-making is compromised. Mansuri’s remarks underscore a pressing issue within the social work sector, shedding light on the critical need for sustainable support systems for social workers to ensure the welfare of those they serve.

Sexed up reports and psychobabble are happening as a direct consequence on social workers to provide children into this oppressive system and the correct decisions are not being made. Why wont the government and its paymasters release information in regard to the cohort that it states would or should never be in family court. Why are they not releasing this. Courts are being asked to make claims on biased improper or information which is sexed up reports. Children need to be in their families. They are told to make things look bad change the Empasis of all reports making the family looks problematic. The paymaster experts are too busy collecting their pay-packet leaving social workers to write these reports under a non de plume calling it nebulous abuse in the form of a cloud or hazy vague or ill-defined report.

I understand the concern about the impact of biased and sensationalized reports on social workers’ decision-making in the family court system. It is crucial for all parties involved to have access to accurate and unbiased information to ensure that the best interests of the children and families are upheld. The lack of transparency and the use of manipulated or exaggerated reports can indeed undermine the integrity of the decision-making process within the family court system.

The call for the government and its stakeholders to release information regarding the specific cohort mentioned in Jeremy Hunts MP Chancellor acting as the Exchequer Budget March 2024 that should not be subjected to family court scrutiny is valid Many family’s situation should not be in family court. Transparency in this regard is essential for ensuring accountability and addressing any discrepancies or potential biases in the system. Courts should be able to rely on accurate and comprehensive information when making decisions that significantly impact the lives of children and families.

Furthermore, the emphasis on producing reports that portray families in a negative light, as well as the potential distortion of information to fit a particular narrative, is a cause for concern. Children indeed thrive in stable family environments, and it is imperative to prioritize their well-being and the preservation of family units whenever possible. Therefore, it is essential to address any instances of nebulous abuse or improper handling of information that could negatively influence the outcomes within the family court system.

David Cameron has publicly said there are too many children in care and that the adoption or care process needs streamlining, but critics say the real issue is about why so many youngsters are taken into care in the first place.

The MP has come out and made statements about the Local Authority in The Southeast of England in Parliament to deaf ears addressed in a letter to Sally Ann Hart MP.

We’re being pressured to go against what we think is right for families

“Parliament must act to sort out the child protection system.”

In summary, promoting transparency, accountability, and the ethical handling of information within the family court system is crucial in safeguarding the well-being of children and families. Addressing any issues related to biased or sensationalized reports is essential for upholding the integrity of the decision-making process and ensuring that children are placed in environments conducive to their growth and development.