Subject: Re: My case goes back to 2006
Message originated outside Switalskis
Re: CCG0000122359
National Crime Agency Professional standards IX.8.26
National Crime Agency CCG0000122359
Action Fraud NFRC241207046189, SDR-026-0161
Information Commissioner Case Reference IC-461437-H0W6
PHSO C-2058682
Metropolitan Police FoIA Request – 47533
Local Government Social Care Ombudsman FOI2025/08198
IBAC (CASE-20246844)
HMCTS Complaint (ref: 79534040)
PALS Ref 2602-0072
Ref: NIC-803189-J4G8C
PHSO: Ref C-2195214
Clinton Library FOIA case 2025-1058-F
Dear David,
I acknowledge your thoughts that my family’s case is complicated
But it boils down to three parts the death of my disabled partner who my daughter was taken from my method of provocatio ad delictum
Emily was four years old. She was sent by Hastings Court under Judge Hollis, with social worker Christine Elizabeth Stirling, to Northern Ireland — or that is what we were told. Neither Emily nor her stepsister had blood relatives there. Or can be located there.
The problem is that the genogram used in Family Court was false and incorrect. Her stepsister was a child of Cunningham from Reading. Reading Social Services will not discuss it. Emily also had another brother and sister. This was her sister’s family. David was Emily’s stepsister’s father. IT is stated

So in fact neither child was borth there or a product of a family living in Northern Ireland
Both children were said to have been sent to Northern Ireland, but they vanished. There is also a handwritten Maxwell Epstein flight document containing details of Christine leaving with children from Ireland.
The coroner informed my mum that Catherine had 7% alcohol in her body, along with benzodiazepine/diazepam. Taken together, these substances can cause heavy sedation, unconsciousness, breathing suppression, or death.
When I called Social Work Northern Ireland, they said they had no details of my daughter on their system. Yet a social worker had called from there claiming to be Emily’s social worker, and video spoofs were made there to support the claim that Emily was in Northern Ireland until she was 25 years old.
There are also concerns about the refusal or failure of other bodies to investigate this properly, including the Ombudsman. We now understand that the office was itself in difficulty. The Children’s Commissioner for Northern Ireland could not sit down with Emily, and no one could provide Emily’s DNA to the laboratory for comparison, even though I had sent my own sample for matching.
Emily had an NHS registration and medical card in the name Emily Cathryn Newbold Smith. East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust has since stated in writing that they could not see a child listed as Emily Newbold on their system. This is a direct records discrepancy and should be reviewed alongside the missing child concerns, Family Court/genogram records, social services records, Reading records, Northern Ireland records, DNA records, and any Ireland-linked records.
Evidence available includes: Emily’s NHS medical card, the written NHS/Trust response stating she was not found on their system, Family Court/genogram concerns, records or correspondence involving Northern Ireland, information relating to the alleged transfer to Northern Ireland, the handwritten travel/flight document, and information concerning the DNA sample provided for comparison.
I am asking for a formal records-tracing review of Emily as a long-term missing child. This should include Hastings Family Court records, the genogram entered into court, social services records, Reading Social Services records, Northern Ireland Social Work records, NHS registration/Child Health/GP records, DNA records, Ireland-linked transfer records, and any records connected to the reported social worker involvement. I also ask that the discrepancy between Emily’s NHS medical card and the later statement that she is not visible on the NHS/Trust system is treated as a key issue. I have such made today separate report to Contact Us — Locate International
I hope this is all the information you are looking for
In respect to the matter in Small Claims court pecuniam dolo obtinere from Nationwide sale of Child Trust fund which my daughter was never provided with and which should ne a method of 1976 Theft Act with an intention to deprive.
The situation in relation to child abduction is simple contrived from Blair and Dunkley in 1979 Meeting a five-page document exists in Clinton Library Breach of Article 3(2) of Directive (EU) 2017/1371) FOIA case 2025-1058-F
· Blair and (“visit” or “trip” or “schedule” or “itinerary” or “agenda”) – 28 hits / 155 pages
· Blair and (“program” or “meeting” or “bilat” or “bilateral”) – 50 hits / 250 pages
· Prime Minister – 383 hits / 1915 pages
· “No. 10” or “Downing Street” – 1 hit / 5 pages
· “UK” and (“visit” or “itinerary”) – 141 hits / 705 pages
· “social provision” and Blair – 1 hit / 5 pages
· Australia and Blair – 0 hits
· New York and Blair – 5 hits / 25 pages
· Dunkley and Blair – 1 hit / 5 pages
Existence of responsive material is no longer in dispute
The releases confirm beyond doubt that: in respect of the two documents recently disclosed to me by the Clinton Presidential Library concerning President Clinton’s meeting with UK Prime Minister Tony Blair in May 1997, namely:
1. “Memo – Background for President Clinton Meeting with PM Blair”
2. “Prime Minister Tony Blair” (redacted release)“
On record I have also written to Donald Trump and lost my X account due to the missing 758,000 children, to what appears to be Epstein similarities, and documents in 1997 aligning the Clinton Care Acts UK with the USA Care Acts. My daughter has been missing for 19 years and was abducted at age 4 from her mother. There have been many lies by lothe cal authority. Already outed by The Express – Sex Up abuse claims the same year Emily is abducted. – thestealingofemily.co.uk On record we now know that Sir Kier Starmer effectively created a situation which striped parental and children’s rights by way of de facto 23 April 2026 letter from Chris Philps letter in regard to Child Abduction Warning Notices and Legal Implications.
Finally, the mechanism for Rotherham and Rochdale and many other cities in the UK ‘ removal of children from Egov.uk.com is well known to the public. It breaches data treaties in FInland and Italy. It is also responsible for my daughter and I alleging 758,000 other children missing which the government claims have not received their child trust funds. Now it is known that a family in the UK Bankrolled Epstein. Is it really such a puzzle?
Warm regards,
Martin Newbold
www.martinnewbold.co.uk
www.thestealingofemily.co.uk
stealingofemily.world
- As Head of the Abuse Compensation Team. Is this what the ownness is putting this all onto the victim for £ 50,000 what would you suggest a go fund me page?
- Details on Child Abduction Warning Notices and Legal Implications
- How Leese Family Connected Epstein to the Bullingdon Club
- The Death they burrowed
- The Leeses: Gateway to the British Establishment and Epstein.








Leave a comment