Printed email from Peter Mandelson to Jonathan Powell, dated 11 May 2002, discussing Clinton’s proposed introduction of Jeffrey Epstein to Tony before a May 14 meeting and calling for further investigation.

There is new information about Clinton wanting to introduce his “travelling friend, Jeffrey Epstein” to Blair is particularly important because it records an attempted introduction before Epstein’s documented 14 May 2002 Downing Street meeting. It’s on page 16 of an official UK government PDF.

Download the original government document (PDF)

Document details:

  • From: Peter Mandelson
  • To: Jonathan Powell, Tony Blair’s chief of staff
  • Date: 7 May 2002, 16:16
  • Subject: Jeffrey Epstein

Mandelson writes:

“Do you remember when Clinton saw TB he said he wanted to introduce his travelling friend, Jeffrey Epstein, to TB?”

He continues:

“This was frustrated – TB said at the time – in the office for reasons (he says) he was unclear about.”

This establishes that Mandelson reported an earlier attempt by Clinton to introduce Epstein to Blair. It doesn’t establish when that earlier conversation occurred or whether the introduction eventually happened before May 2002. GOV.UK this is also on my own drive under https://stealingofemily.world/drive/new-files/V1_FINAL.pdf

It’s an official government PDF. It’s on page 16. An email from Peter Mandelson to Jonathan Powell, Blair’s chief of staff. Dated 7th of May

The reference I have is the document filename V1_FINAL.pdf, but I don’t have a reliable departmental reference/case number for the document itself from the material in front of me.

The Stealing of Emily — Updated Timeline Section

This now aligns and gives concrete evidence

Timeline section

DatePeopleEventStatus
1995–96Matthew DunkleyHarkness Fellowship at Berkeley; travel included New York/WashingtonDocumented
12 Apr 1996Tony Blair, Bill ClintonBlair visit/meeting with Clinton in WashingtonDocumented
23 May 1996Matthew Dunkley, Theresa MackeyBerkeley education committee presentationDocumented
May 1997Dunkley, Blair/ClintonNew York meeting referred to in the existing timeline researchClinton Library FOIA 2025-1058-F, 5 Pages.
Before 7 May 2002Clinton, Epstein, BlairAccording to Mandelson, Clinton had already said he wanted to introduce his “travelling friend”, Jeffrey Epstein, to Blair; the proposed introduction had been frustratedDocumented by Mandelson’s subsequent email; exact earlier date unknown
7 May 2002, 16:16Peter Mandelson, Jonathan PowellMandelson emails Powell about Jeffrey Epstein and refers back to Clinton’s earlier proposed introductionV1_FINAL.pdf, p.16
14 May 2002, 17:00Tony Blair, Jeffrey EpsteinEpstein meeting at Downing Street following the approachDocumented

The potentially important gap is now between the Clinton/Blair contacts already in your timeline and 7 May 2002: we need to establish when Clinton first proposed introducing Epstein to Blair. That date could then be compared directly against the flight records.

Combining it all

The Stealing of Emily — Combined Master Timeline

DatePeople / organisationsEventEvidence status
1989UK GovernmentChildren Act 1989 establishes the statutory child-protection framework.Established
1995–1996Matthew DunkleyHarkness Fellowship at the University of California, Berkeley, researching education systems.Recorded in published research
12 April 1996Tony Blair, Bill ClintonBlair visits Washington and meets Clinton.Documented
23 May 1996Dunkley, Theresa MackeyPresentation to Berkeley’s BSEP Planning and Oversight Committee.Identified documentary reference
October 1996BlairEducation policy becomes a central theme of New Labour’s programme.Documented
19–23 November 1996Bill ClintonOfficial presidential visit to Australia, including Sydney, Canberra and Queensland.Documented
May 1997Blair, Clinton, DunkleyAlleged New York meeting concerning education and children’s services.Meeting remains unverified
1998Blair GovernmentSure Start programme introduced.Established
Before 7 May 2002Clinton, Epstein, BlairClinton had proposed introducing Epstein to Blair, according to Mandelson’s subsequent correspondence.Earlier proposal reported; exact date unknown
7 May 2002, 16:16Peter Mandelson, Jonathan PowellMandelson emails Powell referring to Clinton’s earlier proposed introduction of Epstein to Blair.Government document V1_FINAL.pdf, page 16
14 May 2002Tony Blair, Jeffrey EpsteinDowning Street meeting following Mandelson’s intervention.Documented
October–December 2005UK local authoritiesImplementation milestones for electronic social-care records and the Integrated Children’s System.Council records cited in your research
2006–2007Local authoritiesFurther Integrated Children’s System implementation milestones.Council records cited
2007–2008Jeffrey EpsteinFlorida criminal proceedings and federal non-prosecution agreement.Documented
2009–2013Matthew DunkleySenior leadership of East Sussex children’s services.Documented career period
6 August 2009Ofsted, DunkleyInspection correspondence identifies concerns about social-worker capacity, delayed assessments and inadequate case documentation.Inspection findings cited
February 2010East Sussex children’s servicesC1 and C13 court documents concerning Emily and her family.Documents identified in your investigation
May 2010Emily, East Sussex children’s servicesEmily’s removal, as described in your account.Central event in your investigation
2010East Sussex / OmbudsmanComplaints concerning assessments and alleged inaccuracies in social-work documentation.Complaint references recorded
2011–2012Matthew DunkleyPresident of the Association of Directors of Children’s Services.Recorded career appointment
2012Matthew DunkleyHonours nomination for services to children and families.Recorded in published timeline
17 April 2013Dunkley, East SussexAnnouncement that Dunkley would leave East Sussex for a position in Australia.Documented announcement
October 2014Dunkley, AllmanTelephone conversations subsequently discussed in connection with Victoria’s Ultranet investigation.Reported investigation material
15 March 2016Dunkley, Victorian education authoritiesDunkley reportedly suspended from his regional education position during anti-corruption investigations.Reported; no finding of personal criminal liability established here
2016–2017IBACUltranet investigation and reporting concerning misconduct within Victoria’s education department.Documented investigation
11 January 2017Dunkley, Norfolk County CouncilDunkley begins an interim senior children’s-services appointment.Recorded career appointment
27 November 2017Dunkley, Kent County CouncilAppointment as Director for Children, Young People and Education.Recorded appointment
January 2019East Sussex / Amber Rudd MP’s officeCorrespondence concerning investigations involving Ireland and East Sussex children’s services.Correspondence cited in your timeline
March 2019Kent County CouncilSEND inspection identifies significant weaknesses.Inspection findings
2021–2022Department for Education, PHSOCorrespondence and complaints concerning Emily’s records and whereabouts.Your recorded correspondence
27 September 2022Martin NewboldAffidavit concerning Emily and associated allegations.Affidavit B4/2011/1029
2024UK and international authoritiesFurther complaints and requests concerning records, safeguarding and Emily’s whereabouts.Your correspondence
19 August 2025Clinton Presidential LibraryCorrespondence concerning searches for records relevant to Blair and Dunkley.Published correspondence
1 September 2025Clinton Presidential LibrarySearch result reported: “Dunkley and Blair — 1 hit / 5 pages.”FOIA 2025-1058-F
2025–2026Clinton Presidential LibraryYour separate request becomes associated with another requester’s earlier FOIA case.FOIA 2026-0609-F / 2025-1058-F
20 June 2026Martin Newbold, Clinton LibraryYou challenge the handling of your separate FOIA request and seek confirmation that your information has not been disclosed to another requester.Published correspondence
2026Martin NewboldYou allege that the duplicate or piggyback handling of your FOIA request was unlawful.

Quo vadis, iustitia? I have to inform William Moore that he is breaching my published UCB by failing to provide the decision after the date he stated he would in his communications [https://martinnewbold.co.uk/Unreasonable_Behaviour_Policy...]. Paragraph 68: The Ombudsman can open a new case and reconsider an investigation decision. Paragraph 69: This can happen in exceptional circumstances, including where the original evidence was flawed, the investigation was unfair, or new information could have significantly affected the decision. Paragraph 6 also says they normally review decisions only once, except in exceptional circumstances. Providing you notice, four families are affected by the flawed decision of the PHSO. This case involves a social worker who allegedly committed fraudulent corruption of GRO records and incorrect classification of genogram data in court, which has left the Cunningham family without their daughter Lauren and my family, Newbold, without Emily and another unrelated Irish family being given both children, whilst forged documents have been expressed in NI GRO to cover her tracks when reporting in Reading to Newry advised Newry that her mother moved there with her daughter and she was not born in Newry. The Liverpool GRO has conflated two children on one birth certificate in the folios to contravene the legal registration of children; this is subject to imprisonment under the crimes on this paperwork. I have been provided no DNA evidence cross-matching to provide evidence that my daughter was ever in Northern Ireland. In addition, Social Work Northern Ireland said they could not identify my daughter in Northern Ireland. Oddly, there is a Christine named social worker and children flying out on Lolita Airlines; is this where these children ended up, Teterboro and then into the arms of Jefry Epstein and associates? So you call any of this safeguarding children?

For the avoidance of doubt, this matter has already been brought to the attention of approximately 640 Members of Parliament, resulting in approximately 5120 communications, including acknowledgements, referrals, constituency notices and Parliamentary office responses.

Despite this extensive correspondence, not one response has provided a substantive answer establishing the whereabouts, welfare, safeguarding status, educational status, NHS status or statutory traceability of my daughter, Emily Newbold.


One response to “Blair Education Agenda Dunkley and Political Enablers”

  1. […] Blair Education Agenda Dunkley and Political Enablers […]

Leave a Reply

ACT NOW:

Emily age Four the last time she was seen by anyone.

Help us turn this into a Drama Criminal Youtube took away Videos):
https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/stealing-of-emily

Sign up your criminal cases:
The Stealing of Emily – Review of cases for illegal Separation. | Crowdsignal.com (survey.fm)

Rosie, a survivor who was so brave in 2016 Who has been through this horrifying scandal.

HOW TO REPORT TRAFFICKING TO THE UNITED NATIONS

Updates

Gods children are not for sale

Class action needed 500 plus cases to bring Truth justice and accountability for our children in the corrupt care system. Anyone who remembers the England Post Office Horizon scandal will know we need 500+ names to get A class, collective or group action is a claim in which the court awards permission to an individual or individuals to bring similarly placed claims in a single case. Collective actions are an efficient way of dealing where there are a huge number of claimants suing a large corporation or social services under a similar set of facts.

  • This is why we all stood strong and fought for all our children.
  • Now the only consideration must be to They came for our Children and they are FINISHED.
  • We do not want a Generation without Mothers and Fathers.

Designed with WordPress

Discover more from thestealingofemily.co.uk

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading