What really grabs me here is the whole business with Morgan McSweeney’s phones. I’m looking at a situation where the police are said to have reopened their investigation into the reported theft, and straight away that raises questions for me. I’m told there are doubts about what was said over where the phone was stolen, even down to the street involved, and that CCTV is now part of the picture. That immediately makes this feel less like a simple lost-phone story and more like something politically serious and deeply unclear.

What makes it even more striking to me is the claim that McSweeney had two other phones, and that the Cabinet Office then asked him to hand over details from his private devices. That is where the whole thing starts to look really murky. On the one hand, there is an apparent effort to get access to potentially relevant information, but on the other hand, even in this discussion, there is uncertainty over whether he is actually obliged to provide it. I also find it politically awkward that the Cabinet Office is being described as stepping in while a police investigation is still active. That only adds to the sense that this is a mess.

Then I come to the Mandelson connection, and that is where I think the story becomes bigger than just a phone dispute. McSweeney is described here as a protégé of Peter Mandelson and connected like a brother or cling on to Tony Blair, and that brings in the wider question of how Mandelson himself was handled and vetted. Did the Blair deeper state has a green traffic light with this. Well we already know that Tony Blair is not clean he won’t explain his conversation with children’s Director Matt Dunkley CBE 1997 in New York as documented in the Clinton Library five pages who was caught up in Operation Dunham and somehow got away with what he was suspended for in Operation Dunham and others alleged embezzlement of Education funding I hear the defense that process was followed, but the account in this transcript pushes back hard against that. It says the people involved in vetting Mandelson were McSweeney and Matthew Doyle and argues that neither of them would normally be the right people to carry out that kind of ambassadorial vetting. So from my point of view, the issue is no longer just about missing phones. It becomes a question about whether proper procedures were followed at all.

So the way I see it, this is a story about suspicion, process, and power. I’m not just hearing about a stolen phone. I’m hearing about police interest, private devices, conflicting details, and a chain of political relationships that leads back to Mandelson. That is why this feels like a potentially damaging controversy rather than an isolated incident. IS this all mixed up with Operation Ironside?

• The Blair Trilogy
• Update on arrest of Epstein’s Owner
• The owner of Epstein Island arrested
• Who are “Locate International” – Social Workers using a remote system?
• As Head of the Abuse Compensation Team.  Is this what the ownness is putting this all onto the victim for £ 50,000 what would you suggest a go fund me page?

In The NewsMarch 26, 2024Martin Newbold

Update on arrest of Epstein's OwnerMay 11, 2026Martin Newbold

The Blair TrilogyMay 12, 2026Martin Newbold

1. 

   In the news On Tuesday, the Council of Europe’s group of experts on action against trafficking in human beings (GRETA) published…

2. 

   Alex Davies-Jones has resigned. Sky’s live politics page says at 13:43: “Victims minister Alex Davies-Jones has resigned.” In her letter…

3. 

   Please explain Draregbio to our readers.

4. 

   12 May 2026, say Jess Phillips has resigned. Her role was Safeguarding Minister / Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Safeguarding…

5. 

   Are you aware Webber owns Kiltinan castle in Ireland? It has numerous “sheela na Gigs” figures, grotesque rather than erotic,…