I am writing to you formally and on the public record regarding a matter of national and international concern. Evidence held across multiple government departments now confirms that more than 430,000 Child Trust Fund beneficiaries cannot be located, contacted, or accounted for. This failure directly relates to the disappearance of my daughter, Emily, whose records were falsified, duplicated, or corrupted within government systems. I am requesting immediate acknowledgment and clarification from your office, as this situation represents a systemic safeguarding collapse comparable in scale to the Horizon scandal, with profound implications for child protection, financial governance, and state accountability.

Subject: 430,000 Missing Child Trust Fund Beneficiaries and the Case of Emily

I am placing this statement on the public record.

Evidence now shows that over 430,000 children who should have received their Child Trust Funds have not been located by the UK Government. These young people — including my own daughter, Emily — were never contacted, never paid, and in many cases cannot be found at all.

The scale of this failure raises a serious and urgent question:
How does a government “lose” nearly half a million children?

I allege that these children have, in effect, been abducted by systemic failure. They are missing from education records, social-care records, safeguarding systems, and even citizenship documentation — and many were unlawfully moved far from their family home. Their Child Trust Fund accounts remain dormant, unpaid, or misassigned.

In Emily’s case, the records prove she was never present in the jurisdiction where authorities claimed she was held, yet court orders and placement files were created as if she were. The same pattern is appearing across this wider group of 430,000 missing CTF young people.

The Government’s internal software systems — which appear as unstable as Fujitsu’s Horizon, now infamous for destroying lives — are not fit for purpose. Data is missing, duplicated, corrupted, or falsely assigned, and the Department for Education has already confirmed record inconsistencies.

This is not an administrative error.
This is institutional negligence on a national scale, affecting hundreds of thousands of children.

I am calling for:

  • A public inquiry into the 430,000 unaccounted-for CTF children
  • Full disclosure of system architecture and failures
  • Independent investigation into Emily’s disappearance
  • Immediate safeguarding reviews across all affected Local Authorities

Until the Government can prove otherwise, the public is entitled to ask whether these failures amount to a systemic abduction of children through data corruption, mismanagement, and unlawful removal.

CC:
foi-team+canned.response@cabinetoffice.gov.uk;
contactOCMC@justice.gov.uk;
AlistairHunt2@eversheds-sutherland.com;
Louise.Bowery@cases.financial-ombudsman.org.uk;
William.Moore@ombudsman.org.uk;
icocasework@ico.org.uk;
info@ibac.vic.gov.au;
enquiries@ovic.vic.gov.au;
standardscommissioner@parliament.uk;
standards@parliament.uk;
foi.officer@lgo.org.uk;
M.Cashmore@coinweb.lgo.org.uk;
grc@justice.gov.uk

Warm regards,
Martin Newbold
📧 http://www.martinnewbold.co.uk
🌐 www.thestealingofemily.co.uk

2 responses to “ON THE PUBLIC RECORD”

  1. Martin Newbold Avatar

    The company name being used by Government is the banks in relation to the missing Children’s Trust Fund (CTF) accounts — but the software platform that manages Looked-After Children’s records is supplied by ePEP / EPAC / CIRTO, a system which has also operated under other names over the past decade, including eCare, eCore, and eGov.

    This platform is used by Social Services to manage the records of Looked-After Children who have been taken from their families, meaning that accurate, stable, and legally compliant record-keeping is absolutely essential. Any failure in this system directly impacts safeguarding decisions, placement tracking, education records, identity management, and statutory duties under the Children Act.

    We have now been informed that the integrity of the ePEP / EPAC / CIRTO / eCare / eCore / eGov platform is significantly worse than the Fujitsu Post Office “Horizon” system. In practice, this includes:

    * Disappearing case files,

    * Duplicated or blank records,

    * Profiles assigned to the wrong child,

    * Corrupted timelines and overwritten histories,

    * Misaligned education data within ePEP,

    * Lost CTF identifiers within CIRTO, and

    * Inconsistencies between what councils see and what the central database holds.

    The scale of these failures raises urgent concerns about the safety, location, identity, financial entitlements, and legal status of thousands of children — including those who should have received Child Trust Funds but cannot be located within the system due to corrupted or missing data.

    Like

  2. Martin Newbold Avatar

    Absolutely. Everything I’ve put forward is backed by evidence — nothing I say is without foundation.

    Like

Leave a reply to Martin Newbold Cancel reply

ACT NOW:

Help us turn this into a Drama:
https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/stealing-of-emily

Sign up your criminal cases:
The Stealing of Emily – Review of cases for illegal Separation. | Crowdsignal.com (survey.fm)

Rosie, a survivor who was so brave in 2016 Who has been through this horrifying scandal.

HOW TO REPORT TRAFFICKING TO THE UNITED NATIONS

Updates

Gods children are not for sale

Class action needed 500 plus cases to bring Truth justice and accountability for our children in the corrupt care system. Anyone who remembers the England Post Office Horizon scandal will know we need 500+ names to get A class, collective or group action is a claim in which the court awards permission to an individual or individuals to bring similarly placed claims in a single case. Collective actions are an efficient way of dealing where there are a huge number of claimants suing a large corporation or social services under a similar set of facts.

  • This is why we all stood strong and fought for all our children.
  • Now the only consideration must be to They came for our Children and they are FINISHED.
  • We do not want a Generation without Mothers and Fathers.