“The UK Government, according to its letter from Number 10, has demonstrated a lack of due care and attention regarding the fact that these children possess false identity documents. Despite being informed of this serious issue, there appears to be no acknowledgment or corrective action taken. This raises significant concerns about accountability, the integrity of official records, and the welfare of the children affected.” Local Government Social services Ombudsman (LGSO) We will not investigate this case 24 012 899 – Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman

Mr. Martin Newbold

---

On Sun, Mar 2, 2025 at 6:16 AM Martin Newbold <martinnewbold.mn@gmail.com> wrote:

Mandy Cashmore
Information and Records Officer
Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman
0330 403 4734

CC: ITV Investigations Team
CC: Information Commissioner’s Office, Wycliffe House, Water Lane, Wilmslow, Cheshire; SK9 5AF
CC: First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber), HM Courts & Tribunals Service, PO Box 9300, Leicester, LE1 8DJ

Subject: Formal Response – Failure to Investigate & Provision of Incorrect Information

Our Ref: 24/351 – 24 012 899 and 24/365
(Please use reference 24/351 when contacting us about this request for information.)

Dear Ms. Cashmore,

I am writing to formally challenge the failure of the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman (LGSCO) to conduct a proper investigation into the actions of Reading Social Services, Newry Social Services, and East Sussex Social Services, and the deliberate provision of false and misleading information. The facts of this matter indicate deception and potentially criminal behavior.

It is irrefutable that Reading Social Services received information from Newry Social Services confirming that Catherine/Cathyrn and Lauren had moved to Northern Ireland. This is documented in records held by both authorities. Despite this, Reading Social Services, East Sussex Social Services, and Newry Social Services appear to have deliberately misrepresented or concealed this fact. This raises serious questions:

1. Why has Reading Social Services acted with deception, potentially even criminally, by ignoring documented evidence?
2. Has there been a deliberate effort to obstruct justice through the misrepresentation of Catherine and Lauren’s location?
3. Is this an attempt to manipulate jurisdictional authority to justify unlawful actions?
4. Why has the LGSCO failed to properly investigate this clear misconduct?

Furthermore, I seek urgent clarification on how it is possible for Lauren, Emily’s sister, to have been born in Northern Ireland when this is factually incorrect. If authorities are asserting this falsehood, it suggests either gross incompetence or intentional fabrication. Given the significance of jurisdiction in legal and social service matters, this misinformation must be corrected immediately.

Failure to properly investigate and rectify these issues not only undermines public trust but may also constitute an abuse of power and a miscarriage of justice. I expect an immediate response addressing these concerns, along with a full explanation of the steps the LGSCO will take to hold those responsible accountable.

Should this matter not be addressed with the urgency and seriousness it warrants, I will escalate it further, including legal avenues and public scrutiny through media channels.

I look forward to your immediate and thorough response.

Yours sincerely

Mr. Martin Newbold

---

Subject: Concerns Regarding Communication and Review Request Process
Dear Mr. Price, Mr. Nevols,
Thank you for your recent correspondence regarding the review request process. However, it appears that you have not acted transparently in this matter, and it seems that you may have collaborated with the Local Authority to withhold a proper position. As a result, this matter will now be dealt with publicly, as you have opted to forgo the decision to address it in private. I had asked you to clarify your position and determine which role you intended to play in this situation. It is now evident that there is no clear stance from your side on this important issue.

Kind regards,
Mr. Martin Newbold

Date Created: 17/01/2025 16:44:07

---

Subject: Submission of Documents Regarding Injunction and Defamation Case Involving AnitaCundall
Re: CAS-7983833-X1C1C9
References:
Police: 50239746-2024
Action Fraud: 8872649, NFRC241207046189, REF20147, Allegation DPR202401619
Serious Fraud Office: c98c91180d570dc [Official], 5e118dc08da84da [Official]
ICO: IC-337307-W2B4
Nationwide: NBS8165809, RES10964672
Dear Mr. Nevols,

I hope this message finds you well. I would like to take this opportunity to wish you and your family a happy and prosperous New Year. Please find attached serious communications with the IBAC and the council for your investigator’s review. These documents pertain to the issues surrounding GRo duplicate names after the data set was corrupted by a social worker, which I believe constitutes a criminal offense. Should you require any additional information or clarification, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Yours sincerely,
Mr. Martin Newbold
Date Created: 02/01/2025 10:02:20

message from: Mark Price

04 December 2024

Your ref:
Our ref: 24 012 899
(Please use this reference number when contacting us. If using email, please put the number in the email subject line)

Dear Mr Newbold

Complaint about East Sussex County Council
Thank you for your emails of which I can acknowledge receipt.

Your complaint is in the queue awaiting allocation to an investigator and we will be contacting you in due course.
Yours sincerely
Keith Nevols

Assessment Team Co-ordinator
0330 403 4691
LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND SOCIAL CARE OMBUDSMAN