On 12 October 2025, Martin Newbold submitted a formal communication titled “DS1500 Report & Discharge Form Request” referencing case 640MC413 (PNX-5473849-H4H7). The message, circulated to NHS, HMCTS, ICO, PSNI, and other oversight bodies, documents that NHS 111 (Clare 1024 and Harvey Bailer) could not locate any medical records for Martin or his daughter Emily Cathryn Newbold Smith (NHS 648 343 9091). The enclosed GP letter (6 Oct 2025, The Hill Surgery) confirms no record of “Catherine” or “Emily” under the supplied NHS numbers. The correspondence invokes Jess’s Law, highlighting parents’ rights to transparency in safeguarding and health data, and requests immediate investigation into potential data deletion, misidentification, or abduction within NHS systems, citing government and NSPCC figures on 430,000 unaccounted-for children.

Date Sent: 12 October 2025, 12:14 PM
Subject: Re: DS1500 Report and Discharge Form Request
From: Martin Newbold (martinnewbold.mn@gmail.com)
Reference: PNX-5473849-H4H7
Case No: 640MC413 – Martin Newbold v Nationwide Building Society

Recipients

To:
private.office@health-ni.gov.uk
HMCTS

Cc:

• ppb.southern@psni.police.uk
• ppb@psni.police.uk
• info@ico.org.uk
• icocasework@ico.org.uk
• LAAcounterfraud@justice.gov.uk
• HMCTScounterfraud@justice.gov.uk
• william.moore@ombudsman.org.uk

Attached / Referenced Documents

• GP letter (The Hill Surgery, 6 Oct 2025)
• Complaint notices, court filings, and supporting PDFs including EHCR and FCA correspondence
• A52 Application for Revocation of Placement Order (Hastings Family Court, 2 Dec 2024)
• Witness Statement (26 May 2025)
• Eversheds correspondence and counter-fraud materials

Main Content Summary

You reported:

• NHS 111 (Clare 1024 & Harvey Bailer) could not locate any NHS records for you or your daughter Emily Cathryn Newbold Smith.
• The GP’s letter confirmed no persons named “Catherine” or “Emily” with the NHS numbers you supplied were found.
• You asked whether your daughter (NHS 648 343 9091) has been removed from NHS systems and whether this implies unlawful disappearance.
• You referenced Jess’s Law, citing the parental right to transparency and accountability in safeguarding and data protection.
• You requested an investigation confirming whether Emily’s NHS record still exists, when or by whom any alteration occurred, and what safeguarding data remains.
• You linked this to the 430,000 missing children figure (NSPCC/government CTF statistics).
• You also cited political misrepresentation by PM Keir Starmer (18 Sept 2025, Chequers) as potentially obstructing oversight of missing-children cases.

Outcome Requested

• Written confirmation or investigation reference number
• Cross-departmental review (NHS England, DHSC, ICO, PSNI, HMCTS Counter-Fraud)
• Action under Jess’s Law for parental right to truth and accountability

To: private.office@health-ni.gov.uk, HMCTS

Cc: ppb.southern@psni.police.uk; ppb@psni.police.uk; info@ico.org.uk; icocasework@ico.org.uk LAAcounterfraud <LAAcounterfraud@justice.gov.uk>,
HMCTScounterfraud@justice.gov.uk,
William Moore <william.moore@ombudsman.org.uk>
From: Martin Newbold martinnewbold.mn@gmail.com

Reference : PNX-5473849-H4H7

2025-10-12

Case No: 640MC413 (“The Claim “)

Parties Martin Newbold v Nationwide Building Society

• Enclosures filed: Complaint notices, Eversheds correspondence, supporting evidence PDFs.
• Status: Registered on the case file with OCMC.

Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA)

• Complaint submitted: 17 September 2025.
• Subject: Conduct of Eversheds Sutherland and solicitor Claire Hainsworth.
• Evidence submitted: Seven PDFs including Letter to FSA and Eversheds correspondence. Enclosures and email body in respect to 430,000 children missing.
• Previous Evidence Submitted
  • Enclosures:
  • A52 Application for Revocation of Placement Order (Hastings Family Court, 2 December 2024).
  • N208-eng Emily Newbold Smith.pdf (105K)
  • [Optionally I can attach supporting correspondence already submitted: Nationwide/Eversheds letters, OPONI SAR response, Money Court filings].
  • 2024-12-02- A52 Emily Newbold Smith revocation.pdf (2,135K)
  • Application_Form_ENG EHCR.pdf (318K)
  • 2024-11-18 – STATEMENT to Strasburg EHCR – Read me First.pdf (81K)
  • List of Documents Lodged with the European Court of Human Rights.docx (37K)
  • 2024-11-09 – LGO list of files sent to EHCR.pdf (63K)
  • Complaint Sent to Intelligence.co.uk.pdf(1,052K)
  • 2024-12-20 – N16A General form of application for injunction (05.14).pdf (389K)
  • 2024-08-12@0251PM – Email – WRIT 1st Request Re_ Subject access request (ref_ 19567481) Habeas Corpus Ad Judice.pdf (1,170K)
  • 2024-11-13@0845AM – Email – WRIT Re_ Subject access request (ref_ 19567481) Habeas Corpus Ad Judice.pdf (1,199K)
  • 2024-08-13@0908AM – Email – WRIT Re_ Subject access request (ref_ 19567481) Habeas Corpus Ad Judice.pdf (1,210K)
  • 2024-08-13@1129AM WRIT Email – Re_ Subject access request (ref_ 19567481) Habeas Corpus Ad Judice.pdf (1,219K)
  • 2025-05-26 – Witness Statement Martin Newbold.pdf(302K)
• Status: Awaiting complaint reference number/acknowledgment.

• Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) / formerly FSA
  • Complaint submitted: 17 September 2025.
  • Subject: Nationwide Building Society – handling of Child Trust Funds and solicitors’ conduct.
  • Evidence submitted: Formal letter and supporting documents.
  • Status: Awaiting confirmation of investigation.

Summary of Interaction Regarding NHS Records

Dear Minister Swann, and other parties

On 12th September 2025 AT 10:50am, I spoke with Clare (extension 1024), 111  who confirmed she had discussed my case with her manager, Harvey Bailer. This was in relation to the letter from my GP that I had provided.

Clare and Mr. Bailer stated that they could not locate any NHS records for me and therefore could not provide any health records. Despite the absence of medical files, they asserted that my health was “perfect.” i  asked if my daughter Emily is in perfect heath as the Doctors letter attached seems to indicate that my daughter Emily in no longer on her NHS 648 343 9091 number that she was born with is no longer attached to her am to be informed from this that she has been abducted along with 430,000 other children as identified by the NSPCC and the recent 2025 government statistic of children on obtain their children’s trust fund

The attached letter dated 6 October 2025 from The Hill Surgery (signed by Jackie Horton, Complaint Investigator) confirms that the practice was unable to identify any persons named “Catherine” or “Emily” with the NHS numbers provided, and that no such persons are registered at the practice. This contradicts previous records confirming my daughter’s birth and registration.  

 In the context of Jess’s Law — which reinforces every parent’s right to know that their child is safe, accounted for, and protected within national safeguarding systems — this raises urgent questions about possible data deletion, reassignment, or loss of identity within NHS records. Jess’s Law requires transparency where a child’s welfare, health data, or safeguarding status may be at risk. The principle is clear: no child should disappear from official systems without accountability or investigation.

Given that the NSPCC and recent government statistics identify approximately 430,000 missing or unaccounted-for children in the UK (particularly in connection with unclaimed Child Trust Funds), this situation raises immediate safeguarding and data protection concerns.

Please confirm receipt of this letter and provide a written explanation or investigation reference number. If this matter falls outside your department’s remit, please forward it to the appropriate authority and notify me of that referral.

 I request an immediate investigation to establish:

1. Whether my daughter remains registered under NHS number 648 343 9091;
2. When and by whom any alteration or removal of this record occurred;
3. Whether there is any record of her health, wellbeing, or safeguarding alerts within NHS or police systems; and
4. Confirmation that this matter will be reviewed in line with the principles of Jess’s Law, ensuring the right to truth, accountability, and protection for every child.

Please acknowledge receipt of this correspondence and provide a written response or investigation reference number. If this issue falls outside your department’s remit, please forward it to the appropriate authority and notify me in writing of that referral.

Additional Context – Political Misrepresentation
On 18 September 2025, Prime Minister Keir Starmer stated publicly at Chequers (standing alongside President Donald Trump):

“I draw a limit between free speech and the speech of those that want to peddle paedophilia and suicide … to children.”

This remark, broadcast internationally, was used to conflate legitimate grievances and documentary evidence raised by families (including my own) with the criminal exploitation of children. It has the effect of chilling oversight, misrepresenting victims, and shielding fraudulent conduct from scrutiny under the guise of protecting children.

When such a statement is made at the highest level of government, in front of a U.S. President, it is no longer a domestic matter. It becomes an international one: the UK Government presenting false narratives about children and safeguarding to its allies. This makes FBI interest a matter of reciprocity, especially where U.S. records (e.g., Clinton Library, Epstein flight manifests) are directly tied into the unanswered questions about missing children and misused public funds.

Yours faithfully,

Martin Newbold

---

• Investigating Local Authority Failures in Child Care
• FOIA Request for Investigations on Little St James and Texas Ranch
• Re: Notification of Assessment Outcome – CASE-20246844 [SEC=OFFICIAL]
• Alleged Deletion of Specific Email Evidence
• Clarifying eGov’s History and Missing Video Insight