U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General   &  DOJ

To whom it may concern,

On the public record

Nineteen years ago my daughter Emily went missing because

From my perspective it looks like:

• there was a discussion outside court Christine Sterling S.W and my Solicitor Mike Gratton that suggested a fixed outcome
• your own solicitor Mike Graton couldn’t account for what had just been said on the stand
• on the stand I questioned the social worker  on a specific dated entries in her own records Attendance notes submitted with her statement
• she said she couldn’t remember basic facts (where she was, who she met, why at the court experts address)
• Judge Hollis treated that as mistake/overwork, not something more serious.

Anyone in that position would feel the process wasn’t being taken seriously. Surely this was perjury and deserved a criminal route.

What the court did:

contradiction → credibility issue → continue case

  “The witness was unable to account for a specific event recorded in her own attendance notes, including the date, location, and purpose of a meeting with an expert. The court treated this as a mistake rather than resolving the inconsistency between her written record and oral evidence.”

  “I say that this failure to resolve that inconsistency undermined the reliability of the evidence relied upon.” 

Warm regards,
Martin Newbold
 http://www.martinnewbold.co.uk
 www.thestealingofemily.co.uk stealingofemily.world

---

• FEDERAL ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL AND FORENSIC STATEMENT OF FACTS
• Mandelson’s Appointment: Key Dates and Responsibilities Explained
• For FMB unit: [EXTERNAL] FOIA Appeal / Request for Clarification – Epstein Records (EFTA01656139–41)
• Emily’s Case: Legal Oversights and Perjury Concerns
• The question everyone is asking