Cabinet Office
70 Whitehall
London

1st January 2026

Re:Nationwide Building Society – Alleged Fraud on Child Trust Fund and Obstruction of Account Access (Writ A9Q51NHR / Case 640MC413 Lewis)

Dear Department for Education FOI Team,

Please treat this as a request for information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000.

Background
If the ePEP and Egov system you identified is used for Personal Education Plans in children’s services. Accurate audit trails are necessary to protect children’s sensitive data, detect unauthorised deletion or alteration, and evidence compliance with retention and safeguarding requirements. As described in  FOI2025/19563 then as you have identified ePEP and EGov as a government agency under Gary Daniels and Virtual School, and I been informed that the system is worse than the Post Office Horizon system and leaking like a sieve in a document called MASTER_DOSSIER_ePEP_RISK_EVIDENCE_V1, and ePEP and EGov missing some 758,000 children’s cases according to Office of National Statistics ONS  revised figures of children who have not attained their children’s trust fund. You have already been notified that these discrepancies contain my daughter and other misuse of services, causing child welfare incidents in Rotherham, Rochdale, Oldham, Derby, Nationwide institutions, Isle of Wight, East Sussex, Norfolk, Kent, and that it appears grooming gangs had access to this ePEP and Egov system, and the majority involved grooming gangs. How is this data secure? Why is Gary Daniels or Virtual School Head not able to provide an audit of his data upon request? As the Department of Education passed the buck in my daughter Emily’s  PHSO cases (C-205-8682 and C-205-9461), in which documents were requested to be sent to the Department of Health, and Information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000. (FOIR) served on the Department of Education that was ridiculously alleged to have placed her in a private boys’ school in Brook Street, Tonbridge, Kent, when she was born a girl, and abducted at age four. Your government’s bum steer then seems obstructive and unhelpful. I remind you that my daughter has a European writ on her controlled movement, and N208 Habeas Corpus Ad litem, which you are supposed to have located her under A9Q51NHR .

 Call Recording with the PHSO Stephen Shaw 23rd February 2022 (Made by Headliner).mp4

(Note: A call recording with PHSO Stephen Shaw, dated 23rd February 2022, supports these claims.)

Requested information 

1. Audit trail entries for all actions during, including record creation, updates, deletions, user roles/IDs (or equivalent identifiers), and timestamps.
2. Any system-generated reports indicating records removed, deleted, or archived (including automated processes).
3. The database/table structure (or equivalent technical schema description) relevant to audit logs/audit trail storage for ePEP, EGov.
4. Policies or procedures covering data retention, deletion, and access to audit logs (including any relevant guidance provided to local authorities/suppliers).
5. When exactly do you intend to locate my daughter?
6. Why is the Prime Minister’s Private Office unable to comment?
7. When will the Cabinet open a Public Inquiry Review?
8. Why have I been informed by letter (24/351 – 24 012 899,  24/365 and 24/351) , as directed by Kieth Nevols from LGSO, that they have no bursary to investigate this matter?
9. Why have I been informed under the crimes of Matt Dunkley OBE, under  IBAC investigation 20246844, that the data I sent them, as reported in the Geelong Advisor, that Matt Dunkley OBE was recorded in a mobile phone call outside Dunneys Bar as stating he was advocating deletion of complaints in East Sussex?

If any information is withheld, please cite the exemption(s) relied upon and provide the public interest reasoning where required. If you do not hold all the information requested, please confirm which elements are held and identify, where possible, which body/organisation is likely to hold the remainder.

Yours faithfully,

Martin Newbold

Reply

• Implications of McSweeney’s Phones how does it impact with missing children.
• Emily’s Case: A Family’s Fight for Truth
• Sussex Police will not investigate missing people
• Uncovering Epstein’s Document Anomalies: A Closer Look
• Urgent Request: Follow-Up on Missing Child Case