💔 The Issue
Across the UK, thousands of families have been torn apart by family court decisions made in secret — often supported by Legal Aid funding that should never have been granted.
Parents report cases where:
Hearings were held without judges or lawful seals.
Orders were made when the child was never even present in the jurisdiction.
⚖️ Why It Matters
Legal Aid is funded by the public, not for fake hearings or unlawful removals.
✍️ What to Include
Use your case reference number (if you have one) and explain:
When Legal Aid was granted in your case.
What the solicitor or local authority did (or didn’t do).
Why you believe funds were claimed without proper jurisdiction, representation, or disclosure.
You can contact by email
- FOIPAQUESTIONS@fbi.gov The FBI USA for child abduction
- LAAcounterfraud@justice.gov.uk The Legal aid Fraud Team
- immediates@administrativecourtoffice.justice.gov.uk The immediate Court to re supply your evidence information
- Attach any evidence — court orders without seals, transfer notices, or legal aid certificates that were not acted upon.
- Request confirmation that your case is reviewed for fraudulent Legal Aid claims or public fund misuse.
- Families deserve accountability when state-funded lawyers falsify or obstruct justice.
We stand for every parent whose voice was silenced by secrecy and paperwork that “technically existed” — but never happened.
Solicitors claimed Legal Aid for work that was never carried out or fraudulently conducted.
This is not justice.
It’s fraud funded by the taxpayer — and it’s time to expose it. If you have been subjected to wrongful use of Legal Aid by your local Authority it is now time to get on the record.
I have already sent my submission as have others I urge you all to do the same.
CommentJust Now The truth about the Epstein deal: Director Patel stood before Congress waving the 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement as if it still had power. But that document — signed by U.S. Attorney Alex Acosta on 24 September 2007 — died with Jeffrey Epstein in 2019. The NPA was never meant to be a blanket of silence. It shielded Epstein and his unnamed “co-conspirators” only within the Southern District of Florida, and even that immunity collapsed after his death. The courts proved it when Ghislaine Maxwell was prosecuted in New York. So why do officials still hide behind this obsolete agreement? Why claim “the NPA prevents disclosure” when what’s really stopping them is internal secrecy and political fear? Acosta’s deal protected wealth and power — not victims. It blocked federal charges, spared Epstein’s assets, and silenced dozens of girls. It’s time to release the names, the flight logs, and the financial records. The NPA is dead. The truth isn’t. — @thestealingofemilyTrump Lawyer Admits How Many Millions He Earned Representing Epstein
Comment12m It is imperative that Director Cash releases the helicopter transfer records to Epstein’s Island or explains why prosecutions and deaths have proceeded without the full body of evidence being disclosed. Where is Emily? The Director must move to arrest and interview Clinton, Blair, Dunkley, and Mandelson — and ask them about the 430,000 missing children.— @thestealingofemilyGOP rep: FBI has ‘at least 20’ Epstein client names
Comment2d Well Director Patel has oblique intent we expected him to provide helicopter transfer flight log documents to Epstein Island but instead both is office, and the DOJ provided three aircraft tail numbers to the public and expected us to believe this was all. there was. We wanted to work with him, but he had it abundant he is on the side of Epstein not the publics @thestealingofemily‘Both Of You Be Quiet!’: GOP Geezer Chuck Grassley Loses It When Adam Schiff And Kash Patel Get Into Shouting Match During Hearing
- Letter To Cabinet Office
- Urgent Appeal to the King for Christmas Help in Finding Missing Child
- FORMAL EVIDENCE SUBMISSION: Verification of “abx17@dial.pipex.com” (The Invisible Man) via EFTA Records and TalkTalk Business Metadata
- The case of Mr. Martin Newbold v Nationwide Building Society (Case Number: 1741 7947 6145 5930).
- Investigating Local Authority Failures in Child Care


Leave a reply to mccloskeymarye Cancel reply