“Lets not get ahead of ourselves”

I understand that a human DNA  sample possesses two (of many possible) alleles at each location. See here for What is an allele? The alleles are identified by a DNA number. These are inherited from the parents at conception. One comes from the mother and one from the father. The following happens when we compare the DNA profiles of biological parents. One of the child’s alleles (numbers) will match up with a number from the mother’s sample. While the other should match up with an allele from the father’s sample.  If these alleles match at all locations, we report the person as the biological father of the child. 

When providing advice and assistance under section 16 of FOIA, you should be mindful of any other obligations on you, for example those arising from compliance with the Equality Act 2010.It is important that you abide by Codes of practice. Under Section 45 Code of practice – request handling, Section 46 Code of practice – records management (this guidance is currently being updated), Revised s46 code of practice published 15 July 2021 and Regulation 16 Code of Practice – Discharge of obligations of public authorities under the EIR.I  Informed them I can advise you that my DNA sample J4Z-2Z6R-9X8F-2S9L has already arrived at the laboratory in Southern Ireland . This is a site, also a lab site shared by Ancestry so I would imagine it is a top-rate lab!

To clarify:

• I have already submitted my DNA sample (Ref: J4Z-2Z6R-9X8F-2S9L) to a top-tier laboratory in Southern Ireland shared by Ancestry.
• The sample was sent via AnPost under tracking RF525635913GB, labelled “Exempt Human Specimen Category C,” addressed to:
  DNA, Shannon Free Zone, Response Paid, Shannon, Co. Clare, V14 HN40, IRELAND
  Ref: IBRS IKE50802 CCR 50802.

I had, therefore, after this debacle with Colm McCafferty, placed my human DNA sample at some expense with a laboratory for this aim.  I asked them, please write when you have obtained the DNA sample from the person you allege is my daughter, and I  provided them with my laboratory address and reference to the deposited genetic material. It went via ANPost as I remember there was a customs issue  under RF525635913GB  Exempt Human Specimen Category C to  DNA Shannon Free Zone, Reponse Paid Shannon Co.Clare V14 HN40 IRELAND reference IBRS IKE50802 CCR 50802

Over the last two months ending September 2024   I have written 18 letters to the Children’s Commissioner, asking for a meeting with my daughter. Despite the lack of communication from their office, they have not provided any details stating that they had met with her. After speaking with social workers in Northern Ireland, I was advised to file a missing person’s report, which I am now doing.

I expect you to ensure  Colm McCafferty,  obtains a Human DNA sample for the young woman whom they alleged thier Trust has incarcerated under section 50 illegally, who could potentially be Emily Catheryn Newbold Smith my daughter Emily Catherine  Newbold-Smith,  DOB  30th October 2006 NHS 648 343 9091 Not Catholic or Irish.

NHS Identity

Currently believed not to be alive. Can you please contact me when you have obtained a human DNA sample so it may be directed to the laboratory for testing? 

 There has been no communication from the chief executive and their chief executive as an accountable officer Michelle Tennyson who I expected would conduct a disciplinary meeting with this interim Director. Why has this not happened, why has the Paternity test data not been processed, and the results provided? There must be a reason why Southern Health and Social Trust is so inept at health and parenting concerns. Primarily this regards the money it creates around the children it abuses in its care that there is no regulator. For while the secretary of state swaggers on TV neglecting his post-bag or providing a single reply to correspondence, does he think this absolves him from his office duties? Codes of practice have been totally ignored and instead, organised propaganda put out in replacement of it.    

You explained Emily was ‘mishandled’ and this is not appropriate for a child. You may have said everything that has been done was ‘mishandled’, my daughter was ‘mishandled’, the situation of events was ‘mishandled’ and the situation in East Sussex was ‘mishandled’, what did you mean one or all the above? I should not need to point out the document Strasbourg, 8.3.2022 COM (2022) 105 final 2022/0066(COD) Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on combating violence against women and domestic violence

(https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52022PC0105). This false information and both of your actions have formed the withholding of justice for the serious crime. I am aware that this is being recorded in the press in your country: “WHOA UNTO YE LAWYERS/LIARS A BAR MEMBER OUTS THIS CORRUPT SOCIETY”. (https://www.bitchute.com/video/bSv6yZ6cUyFC/)

You indicated that your second-class letter was written regarding the meeting in the public domain on 8^th January 2024. You principally did not address the elephant in the room which was staring at you in the face several inches from your nose! Firstly, let us address your habitual claims that you support an Ombudsman investigation, when the evidence sent to your Trust is so clear that they can only provide investigation for hospitals not Children and Young People’s Services. Your statement that you have fully exhausted the complaint would then seem flawed. Your letter attached is a parent copy of a report in which you have not indicated to me which other parties it was shared with.

Furthermore, a certain process supplied by letter was recorded as being offered in this meeting which has not been forthcoming originating as being said it will be provided in this recording.  Furthermore, you are skimming over salient points in deference to your Trust which has been explicitly noted in previous correspondence which quite plainly has been ignored as is the unlawful behavior of the Trust which was quite clearly expressed in this meeting which you did not note concerning providing contact under section 50 false detention. Clearly it is the responsibility of your team under this legal document being in force to provide. Since pointing this out to you many months, in fact years ago, nothing has been done to correct this unlawful behavior.

As the elephant in the room none of the Trust’s persona attending this meeting could or would identify the picture / image / photograph, they said they had a picture / image / photograph which they held on file.  It was not described in this meeting in fact and picture / image / photograph of likeness of my daughter. I have undertaken a DNA test at some significant cost and placed genetic samples in the laboratory. These genetic materials must be used within restricted timelines. I suggest you take immediate action and provide a DNA sample to an equivalent laboratory so that similarities can be undertaken for this person, which you are unlawfully holding, to identify you as holding my daughter.

I filed a complaint with the Public Service Ombudsman of Northern Ireland Case Reference number 202006004. Namely, Southern Health and Social Care Trust implying it is not communicating with the public. This hints at poor communication, obfuscation and unwillingness to provide a proper complaint service and obey legislation concerning unlawful breaches of hate
crimes

You may have said everything that has been done was ‘mishandled’, my daughter was ‘mishandled’, the situation of events was ‘mishandled’ and the situation in East Sussex was ‘mishandled’, what did you mean one or all the above? I should not need to point out the document Strasbourg, 8.3.2022 COM (2022) 105 final 2022/0066(COD) Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on combating violence against women and domestic violence (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52022PC0105).

This false information and both of your actions have formed the withholding of justice for the serious crime. I am aware that this is being recorded in the press in your country: “WHOA UNTO YE LAWYERS/LIARS A BAR MEMBER OUTS THIS CORRUPT SOCIETY”. (https://www.bitchute.com/video/bSv6yZ6cUyFC/)

Warm regards,
Martin Newbold
 http://www.martinnewbold.co.uk
 www.thestealingofemily.co.uk

Formal international warrant-equivalent document

• Details on Child Abduction Warning Notices and Legal Implications
• How Leese Family Connected Epstein to the Bullingdon Club
• The Death they burrowed
• The Leeses: Gateway to the British Establishment and Epstein.
• “Formal Complaint: Suspected Fraudulent Use of Money Claim / Court Process and £7,500 Costs Demand Following £2,000 Claim”