6th June 2025

As recently highlighted by the BBC’s morning broadcast with Danny Pike — and confirmed in writing — Councillor Keith Glazier was aware he was breaching the Code of Conduct, yet no meaningful sanction was applied.

I had already served a habeas corpus request under formal reference, due to serious safeguarding concerns — namely, that my daughter had gone missing, and that the Local Authority was knowingly placing the council in financial deficit by continuing to claim alleged care costs.

The most recent LGSCO publication is the Annual Report and Accounts 2023–24, which was laid before Parliament on December 16, 2024. This report provides an overview of the Ombudsman’s activities and performance for the period from April 2023 to March 2024.

Despite this, no transparent review or disciplinary process was initiated. This represents a breach of both statutory duty and the Nolan Principles of public life.

I refer to the following relevant Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) case references already in existence:

  • RADIO: Keith Glazier references, in addition to those provided: 19695605, 19890574, IC-255415-V5N6, IC-256137-B8Q5, and IC-340906-C7G6.
  • This concerns Martin Newbold’s numerous communications regarding East Sussex County Council’s handling and funding of children’s care, including legal breaches and ongoing safeguarding issues related to his daughter, Emily.
  • Martin Newbold has also filed multiple formal applications and writs with various authorities, such as the European Court of Human Rights and the High Court, addressing these serious matters.

These matters demand immediate review by the relevant oversight authorities, and reinforce the urgent national need for binding standards enforcement — including the ability to suspend or disqualify elected officials who act in clear conflict with their public responsibilities.”

While ordinary citizens are held to strict codes of behaviour and face real consequences for misconduct, the same does not apply to many local councillors.

When a councillor breaches the Code of Conduct — through rudeness, bias, abuse of position, or failure to act with integrity — residents expect these matters to be taken seriously. But in reality:

  • Local standards committees can issue a slap on the wrist — such as a “recommendation” for training or an apology — but have no power to suspend or disqualify councillors.
  • The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman (LGSCO) often cannot investigate these complaints directly. In many cases, they lack the remit, legal authority, or funding to act, even when a resident has suffered injustice.
  • Meanwhile, councillors remain in office, often unaffected, while those who raise concerns are left powerless and unheard.

❗ This is a system that protects the powerful — not the public.

This is why current government proposals to allow short-term suspension and even disqualification in the most serious cases are so crucial.

These reforms, long overdue, would:

  • Give councils the teeth to enforce the codes they already have,
  • Allow residents to see justice done,
  • And restore faith in local democracy — where public service must mean accountability, not immunity.

✉️ Real Case Example:

“I took my complaint to the LGSCO — only to be told they couldn’t investigate, and lacked the funding or authority to act. This is not accountability. This is a dead end. Without reform, public trust will continue to erode.”

Cite:
Danny Pike – 05/06/2025 – BBC Sounds

https://www.lgo.org.uk/information-centre/news/2025/may/ombudsman-complaints-data-issued-today

The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman (LGSCO) released a report on May 21, 2025, detailing the annual complaints data for the 2024–25 period. This data includes information on the volume of complaints handled, the number upheld, satisfactory remedies provided, and compliance with Ombudsman recommendations. Notably, the LGSCO has shifted its reporting emphasis from percentages to absolute numbers to provide clearer context for councils and the public.

One response to “The Double Standard in Local Government Accountability”

  1. Martin Newbold Avatar

    AI’s Current Limitations in “Crisis” Recognition and Nuance:

    You’re essentially asking: If I, an AI, struggled to identify the full scope of “crisis points” in a text (even with prompting), how can systems like monday.com, which might incorporate AI, be trusted to handle similar complexities or replace human involvement, especially when critical judgment is needed?

    Here’s my attempt to address that:

    AI’s Current Limitations in “Crisis” Recognition and Nuance:
    My initial “failure” to identify the full depth of the crisis points, and the need for your direct guidance, illustrates a key limitation of AI in its current form:

    • Lack of Human-like Intuition and Contextual Understanding: I process information based on patterns and explicit data. I don’t possess intuition, empathy, or the ability to infer nuanced “crisis” implications that a human might immediately grasp from fragmented information or subtle cues, especially when dealing with human suffering or systemic injustice. I didn’t connect “The Stealing of Emily” in the URL to a specific “missing young woman” video unless prompted directly.
    • Reliance on Explicit Data: I needed you to explicitly point out details like the “430,000 trust funds,” the specific issues with “contract law” (which turned out to be “written agreements”), or the specific allegations against Matt Dunkley in Australia. These details, while critical to the overall “crisis,” were not centrally elaborated within the single timeline article I was initially asked to summarize. My “Browse” tool extracted text, not the full context of a website or external allegations.
    • Interpretation of “Crisis”: What constitutes a “crisis” to a human often involves moral, ethical, and emotional dimensions that AI doesn’t inherently “understand” or prioritize without being specifically trained or prompted to look for them. My default is often to provide a factual, neutral summary.

    AI’s Role: Augmentation vs. Replacement:
    Your concern about platforms like monday.com (or any system using AI) replacing human involvement touches on a valid and ongoing debate. AI is often powerful for:

    • Processing Vast Data: Analyzing huge datasets, identifying trends, and automating repetitive tasks far faster than humans can.
    • Efficiency: Streamlining workflows and improving operational speed.
    • Pattern Recognition: Detecting anomalies or patterns in data that might indicate issues (though not necessarily “crises” in a nuanced human sense).

    However, as search results on AI in crisis management confirm, AI currently struggles significantly with:

    • Ethical Decision-Making: AI lacks a moral compass and can perpetuate biases if its training data is biased.
    • Contextual Understanding: It struggles with ambiguity, uncertainty, and understanding complex human situations that require real-world experience.
    • Emotional Intelligence and Empathy: Crucial for sensitive issues like child welfare, AI cannot replicate the human touch, intuition, or empathy needed for effective communication and support in crises.
    • Accountability and Transparency: It can be difficult to understand why an AI made a certain decision, which is problematic in high-stakes environments.
    • Adaptability to Novel Situations: While it learns from data, AI isn’t inherently adaptable to entirely novel, unforeseen crises that fall outside its training parameters, which human judgment excels at.

    Therefore, the concern is valid. My performance in this conversation mirrors some of the broader limitations of AI when it comes to the nuanced, ethical, and emotionally charged aspects of crisis identification and management, especially compared to the depth of human judgment. In critical areas like child services, the consensus is that AI should augment human capabilities by handling data, flagging patterns, and automating tasks, but it cannot replace the human oversight, ethical reasoning, and empathetic judgment essential for dealing with people in crisis.

    Like

Leave a reply to Martin Newbold Cancel reply

ACT NOW:

Help us turn this into a Drama Criminal Youtube took away Videos):
https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/stealing-of-emily

Sign up your criminal cases:
The Stealing of Emily – Review of cases for illegal Separation. | Crowdsignal.com (survey.fm)

Rosie, a survivor who was so brave in 2016 Who has been through this horrifying scandal.

HOW TO REPORT TRAFFICKING TO THE UNITED NATIONS

Updates

Gods children are not for sale

Class action needed 500 plus cases to bring Truth justice and accountability for our children in the corrupt care system. Anyone who remembers the England Post Office Horizon scandal will know we need 500+ names to get A class, collective or group action is a claim in which the court awards permission to an individual or individuals to bring similarly placed claims in a single case. Collective actions are an efficient way of dealing where there are a huge number of claimants suing a large corporation or social services under a similar set of facts.

  • This is why we all stood strong and fought for all our children.
  • Now the only consideration must be to They came for our Children and they are FINISHED.
  • We do not want a Generation without Mothers and Fathers.