NEWS| NEWS POLITICS | N.Ireland

The latest government idea seems to be School/Prisons already set up In Northern Ireland these schools seem armed with one social worker and two receptionists in the case of Newry the Legal Concerns in South Down, Newry are in this in this article.

The article “Addressing Ethical and Legal Concerns in South Down, Newry” delves into the troubling ethical and legal issues plaguing the region, particularly in the context of social work and child welfare. It highlights the pervasive lack of transparency and accountability within social work practices, leading to widespread mistrust among affected families. Furthermore, the article exposes instances of coercive behavior by social workers over the past 13 years, underscoring the urgent need for reform and oversight. These ethical breaches not only violate professional standards but also erode public trust in social services, necessitating comprehensive measures to ensure compliance with legal standards and uphold the rights and well-being of vulnerable individuals in the community.

Upon reviewing your response, I felt compelled to provide additional context and information to aid in your assessment of the situation. It appears that there might be some confusion regarding the legal framework governing the care facility in question. The Children (Northern Ireland) Order 1995, particularly section 20, outlines the importance of yearly appraisals for children in care homes. However, it seems there may be instances where these legal obligations are not being met, particularly concerning the rights of children to appeal for reunification with their parents, whether they are in a boarding school or prison.

In addition, the current situation with Northern Ireland has become untenable. The Interim Director of social services in Newry does not abide by Section 20 of The Children (Northern Ireland) Order 1995 or under the provision which it makes under Article 19; or the information acts Section 10 which Lord Falkner states that he must obey.

The W.H.O Parental alienation is quite clear in regard to the legal consequences of creating hate crime and parental alienation, why is Southern Health and Social Care Trust not adhering to this standard? I have written and asked for an advocate. None has been provided DNA has still not been provided from Newry for my imprisoned daughter. Can you, the FBI, please inform me what changes have been made to the use of DNA in America? You can suggest that the Southern Health and Social Care Trust, if they are not turning up to this hearing and providing evidence of DNA which I have already gone out of my way to provide in a court case, would lose evidentially by default. Timed with my Trilogy of books there has never been any challenge of describing the situation. Why have they not been answering when I have done everything which is humanly possible? As they have not responded they should be handing my daughter back. If parents want to be involved, why are they not being involved? No child wants to think that no parent loves them. Is this why she was sent to N.Ireland to cut off all blood ties with her biological parents? Is this the stop-gap and it seems to fit?

Parental alienation is a complex issue often arising from high-conflict custody battles and divorce situations. The WHO link (https://www.who.int/standards/classifications/frequently-asked-questions/parental-alienation) provides valuable insights into the phenomenon, emphasizing the harmful effects on children and families. It’s imperative to address the root causes of parental alienation and ensure that children have access to both parents in a healthy and supportive environment.

Furthermore, still unresolved , there is a letter stating that the Newry Office of Children Services is in breach of Section 10, further highlighting the disregard for legal obligations and exacerbating concerns about the competency and integrity of the authorities involved in Emily’s case.

Additionally, the article “Appeal Court of Protection Hands Out Propaganda” highlights how the Court of Protection has been distributing misleading information to justify their decisions. This propaganda further entrenches the systemic issues within the child protection system, which have led to the unjust treatment of Emily and many others.

Furthermore, the “Forced Adoption Survey 2002–2024 and Ongoing Record” sheds light on the broader issues of forced adoptions and care orders in the UK. This extensive survey documents numerous cases where children were taken away from their parents without proper justification, highlighting a systemic problem that continues to affect families like mine.

Recent letters to Ofsted and the ETI Northern Ireland Inspection Service further underline these concerns. As detailed in “Letters to Ofsted and Inspection Service Team ETINI”, there are glaring discrepancies and inadequacies in the inspection processes, contributing to a lack of accountability and oversight.

Moreover, the initiation of an investigation by the Prime Minister’s Office, as noted in “Investigation by Prime Minister’s Office Started”, underscores the severity of the issue. The involvement of high-level government officials indicates the critical need for a comprehensive review and immediate action to rectify these systemic failings.

Adding to the distress, the article “The Express – Sex Up Abuse Claims” details how social workers have been pressured to exaggerate claims of abuse to justify the removal of children from their families. This practice, driven by a desire to meet targets and avoid scrutiny, has led to the wrongful separation of countless families, including my own. The systemic fabrication of abuse claims undermines the integrity of the child protection system and causes irreparable harm to the children and families involved.

Furthermore, I recently received a response from my Member of Parliament regarding the funding for the Justice System. As detailed in “Response Received from MP This Morning”, the Government announced a funding package in the Spring Budget 2024, which includes £55 million for Family Justice to support separating families and expand the scope of Legal Aid. While these measures are steps in the right direction, it is imperative that they are implemented effectively to ensure families like mine receive the necessary support and justice.

Additionally, a recent court order regarding asylum and migration management could impact the number of children migrating into Northern Ireland. As discussed in the article “New Court Order Seems to Affect More Children Migrancy into N. Ireland”, the Asylum and Migration Management Regulation (AMMR) adopted by the EU Parliament could lead to an increase in relocated asylum seeker applicants. This regulation, although aiming to distribute migratory pressure more evenly among EU states, challenges the sovereignty of member countries, including Ireland, by potentially dictating immigration policies.

In the case of my daughter, she appears to be stymied from contacting her parents due to systemic failures and unethical practices within the social services system. This not only violates legal standards but also perpetuates emotional harm and trauma on the child. It’s crucial to hold accountable those responsible for such actions and advocate for the well-being and rights of the child.

1. School/Prisons Setup and Legal Framework

The concept of “School/Prisons” you’re describing seems to refer to a model where educational and welfare institutions are heavily regulated and monitored, possibly creating an environment perceived as restrictive. This terminology reflects concerns over the balance between providing care and imposing control.

Legal Framework:

• The Children (Northern Ireland) Order 1995: This legislation is foundational for child welfare in Northern Ireland. Sections 19 and 20 focus on the responsibilities of local authorities to review and maintain the welfare of children in care. Specifically, Section 20 mandates regular reviews of children’s cases to ensure their well-being and to address any issues regarding their care, which might include reuniting them with their families when possible.Concerns Raised:
  • Yearly Appraisals: The claim that the Interim Director of Social Services in Newry is not adhering to the mandatory yearly appraisals under Section 20 is serious. Such reviews are crucial for the rights of children and their families.
  • Article 19 and Section 10: These sections deal with the general duties of authorities towards children in need and the handling of information related to their care. Any failure to comply can be legally and ethically problematic.

Actions:

• Legal Recourse: Families can seek judicial review if they believe local authorities are not fulfilling their legal obligations under the Children (Northern Ireland) Order 1995. This can compel authorities to adhere to their statutory duties.
• Advocacy and Support: Engaging with organizations like the Northern Ireland Commissioner for Children and Young People (NICCY) or seeking support from legal advocacy groups might provide additional leverage and support.

2. Ethical and Legal Concerns in Social Work

The article “Addressing Ethical and Legal Concerns in South Down, Newry” highlights significant ethical breaches and coercive behaviors by social workers. This is deeply troubling as it undermines public trust and the rights of vulnerable families.

Issues Highlighted:

• Coercive Behavior: Any instance of coercive behavior by social workers violates professional ethics and legal standards. This needs thorough investigation and accountability.
• Transparency and Accountability: The lack of these fundamental principles in social work practices exacerbates mistrust and hinders effective child protection.

Actions:

• Oversight and Reform: Advocating for greater oversight and reforms within social services, possibly through independent inquiries or commissions, could address systemic issues.
• Professional Standards: Ensuring that social workers adhere to professional standards, such as those outlined by the Northern Ireland Social Care Council (NISCC), is essential.

3. Parental Alienation and Child Rights

Parental alienation is a complex issue that affects the emotional and psychological well-being of children. The World Health Organization (WHO) has recognized its harmful effects, and it requires careful handling in legal and welfare contexts.

Issues Highlighted:

• Lack of DNA Evidence: In your case, the failure to provide DNA evidence and engage with parents’ rights raises significant concerns.
• Legal and Ethical Standards: Ensuring adherence to standards that prevent parental alienation and uphold the rights of children to maintain relationships with both parents is critical.

Actions:

• Legal Appeals: If the authorities fail to comply with legal standards regarding DNA evidence or parental rights, legal appeals or complaints to higher authorities might be necessary.
• Public Advocacy: Raising awareness and advocating through public and political channels can highlight these issues and press for action.

4. Government and Institutional Responses

The various articles and responses from governmental bodies, such as the involvement of the Prime Minister’s Office and the funding for the Family Justice system, indicate that there is some recognition of these systemic issues at higher levels.

Issues Highlighted:

• Funding and Policy Changes: The recent funding announcements for the Family Justice system suggest an attempt to address these issues, but their effective implementation remains crucial.
• Inspection and Accountability: The role of inspection services like Ofsted and the ETI in maintaining accountability in child welfare practices is vital.

Actions:

• Monitoring Implementation: Ensuring that new policies and funding are effectively implemented and monitored can help address systemic failures.
• Ongoing Advocacy: Continuous advocacy and engagement with policymakers and inspection services can keep these issues in focus and drive meaningful change.

5. Specific Concerns in Newry

The specific situation in Newry, involving allegations of legal breaches and the handling of cases, such as the one involving your daughter, underscores the urgent need for a comprehensive review and intervention.

Actions:

• Legal and Advocacy Support: Seeking legal advice and advocacy from organizations that specialize in child welfare and human rights could provide a stronger basis for challenging any injustices.
• Engagement with Authorities: Persistent engagement with local and national authorities, supported by documentation and legal arguments, can increase pressure for compliance and resolution.

Conclusion

The issues you’ve raised are complex and multifaceted, involving legal, ethical, and systemic concerns in child welfare and social services in Northern Ireland. Addressing these requires a combination of legal action, advocacy, and engagement with both local and higher-level authorities. It’s crucial to keep pressing for transparency, accountability, and reform to protect the rights and well-being of children and families.

For more specific advice and support, consider consulting with legal experts in Northern Irish child welfare law, and connecting with advocacy groups that specialize in these issues.