NEWS| LOCAL NEWS | N. IRELAND

Social Work England 1 North Bank, Blonk Street Sheffield, S3 8JY United Kingdom

Dear Investigations Team,

I am writing to express my deepening concerns regarding the lack of response and the issues raised during our previous discussions.

As per our previous communications, I have brought to your attention several critical matters concerning the integrity of social work practices and the protection of vulnerable children. In response to my inquiries, I received a message acknowledging the high volume of enquiries and applications being experienced by Social Work England. While I understand the challenges posed by increased workload, I find the response provided to be insufficient in addressing the urgent nature of the issues I have raised.

Specifically, I highlighted concerns regarding three articles published on thestealingofemily.co.uk: “Family Law Challenges: Addressing Trauma and Neglect,” “Consent and Child Welfare: Section 20 in Northern Ireland vs. England,” and “Effects and Implications of Outsourcing Children’s Care in England.”

The article “Effects and Implications of Outsourcing Children’s Care in England” sheds light on the consequences of outsourcing childcare services and the potential impact on vulnerable children. It raises questions about accountability, transparency, and the quality of care provided by external agencies. The outsourcing of childcare services may lead to fragmentation and lack of coordination, ultimately compromising the well-being of children under the care of social services.

Furthermore, I draw your attention to the article “Section 20 arrangements shake-up expected for social workers following Munby guidance” published on Community Care. This article discusses the anticipated changes in Section 20 arrangements for social workers following guidance provided by Sir James Munby. While the shake-up in Section 20 arrangements underscores the need for clarity and consistency in safeguarding the rights and welfare of children, it is important to note that Sir James Munby’s guidance primarily focuses on England. However, it does not seem to address the complexities of devolved countries where this mandate should also be consistent. The lack of clarity and uniformity across devolved states raises concerns about the effective implementation of Section 20 arrangements and the protection of vulnerable children. It is imperative that social workers across all jurisdictions adhere to updated guidance to ensure the effective protection of vulnerable children under their care.

Furthermore, I recently communicated with the Prime Minister Rishi Sunak via Twitter, expressing concerns about the lack of a plan to address the abduction of children by child abusers, resulting in more than half a million children now residing in a social work prison camp in Newry funded by the EU. I emphasized the urgent need for a plan to repatriate these children, highlighting the gravity of the situation and the need for decisive action. To date, there has been no plan of repatriation, leaving these vulnerable children in an increasingly precarious situation. The exploitation of vulnerable children, with over half a million abducted from the UK mainland and held in a facility overseen by social worker Donna Hughes, raises serious questions about ethics and morality. This situation, supported by EU funding amounting to 45 million pounds, underscores the dire consequences of what can only be described as “commerce gone mad.”

It is essential to ensure that social workers adhere to the mandates and codes of conduct set forth by Social Work England. As outlined in the Code of Conduct for Staff provided by Social Work England, staff members are expected to uphold the highest standards of professionalism, integrity, and ethical behavior in their practice. Failure to adhere to these standards undermines the trust and confidence of service users and compromises the effectiveness of social work interventions. By upholding these standards, social workers can effectively safeguard the rights and well-being of vulnerable individuals and promote positive outcomes within their practice. I urge Social Work England to thoroughly review and enforce these mandates to uphold the integrity of the profession and ensure the protection of vulnerable children under their care.

The lack of response from Social Work England to my inquiries compounds these concerns. The absence of communication fosters a sense of frustration and undermines confidence in the regulatory process. As a stakeholder invested in the welfare of vulnerable children and the integrity of social work practices, I am deeply troubled by the apparent disregard for addressing these pressing issues.

I have made diligent efforts to engage with Social Work England by raising pertinent issues through various channels, including written correspondence and online inquiries. However, the lack of acknowledgment or follow-up on my queries is disconcerting and indicative of a broader pattern of unresponsiveness. This lack of engagement not only impedes progress toward resolving critical issues but also erodes trust in the regulatory authority entrusted with overseeing social work practices.

The gravity of these concerns cannot be overstated, particularly in light of the vulnerable populations affected by the shortcomings in our regulatory framework. It is imperative that Social Work England takes immediate and decisive action to address these issues, restore confidence in the regulatory process, and ensure the effective protection of vulnerable children across all jurisdictions.

In summary, I request that Social Work England provide a legal response to the matters raised, addressing each concern with legal analysis and providing references to relevant statutes, regulations, and case law. Additionally, I would like to emphasize the importance of addressing the issues raised in the articles referenced, particularly the anticipated changes in Section 20 arrangements following Sir James Munby’s guidance.

With respect, it appears that there is a lack of understanding or implementation of legal mandates across devolved states to protect against the abduction of our children. Consent laws should be uniformly applied and enforced to ensure consistent protection for vulnerable children across all jurisdictions.

Thank you for your attention to this matter. I trust that Social Work England will take the necessary actions to rectify these issues and reaffirm its commitment to promoting the highest standards of social work practice and child welfare.

Enter your email below to receive updates.

2 responses to “Social Work England: Addressing Critical Child Welfare Issues”

  1. Addressing Ethical and Legal Concerns in South Down, Newry – thestealingofemily.co.uk Avatar

    […] transparency in how social work decisions are made and implemented. As highlighted in the article “Social Work England: Addressing Critical Child Welfare Issues” on May 26, 2024, there have been significant issues related to the opaque nature of social work […]

    Like

  2. Crisis in Social Services requires Repatriation – thestealingofemily.co.uk Avatar

    […] Addressing critical child welfare issues in England, including those related to social work practices, is crucial. For more insights, please review the report at https://thestealingofemily.co.uk/2024/05/26/social-work-england-addressing-critical-child-welfare-is…. […]

    Like

Leave a reply to Crisis in Social Services requires Repatriation – thestealingofemily.co.uk Cancel reply

ACT NOW:

Help us turn this into a Drama:
https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/stealing-of-emily

Sign up your criminal cases:
The Stealing of Emily โ€“ Review of cases for illegal Separation. | Crowdsignal.com (survey.fm)

Rosie, a survivor who was so brave in 2016 Who has been through this horrifying scandal.

HOW TO REPORT TRAFFICKING TO THE UNITED NATIONS

Updates

Gods children are not for sale

Class action needed 500 plus cases to bring Truth justice and accountability for our children in the corrupt care system. Anyone who remembers the England Post Office Horizon scandal will know we need 500+ names to get A class, collective or group action is a claim in which the court awards permission to an individual or individuals to bring similarly placed claims in a single case. Collective actions are an efficient way of dealing where there are a huge number of claimants suing a large corporation or social services under a similar set of facts.

  • This is why we all stood strong and fought for all our children.
  • Now the only consideration must be to They came for our Children and they are FINISHED.
  • We do not want a Generation without Mothers and Fathers.