HOME NEWS | LOCAL NEWS | N. IRELAND

She was taken from her mother’s care after I tried to take a residency order in the court. I did not know at the time that the Fourplus team. Have duty to report anything out of ordinary to Social Services. I was expecting to get a fair hearing what I was given was a sham-court hearing in family court with crooked solicitor a perjuring social worker who wrote all the export reports and an unqualified judge. Now much further on I appealed to high Court and was stopped getting there by my Local Authority who knew they was unlawful.

It was clear to me this was “To be my downfall”

The situation in the court was becoming farcical as I had to sack my solicitor on the family court stand:

“A solicitor put on the stand who could not even remember what he was discussing outside the hearing as was the case of my solicitor Mike Gratton formally of his own practice now gone. He was sacked on the stand and asked to leave court room.”

“Early Help” is an anathema and add to is a pathway to feel harmed itself as stress, regret, shame, embarrassment, or feelings of negative self-worth through their ignorance and the willful ignoring of directives it means “Early Social Services Involvement”.

The current situation with Northern Ireland has got out of control the Interim Director of social services in Newry does not abide by section 20 of The Children (Northern Ireland) Order 1995 or under the provision which it makes under Article 19; or the information acts Section 10 which Lord Falkner states that he must obey.

20.—(1) Every authority shall review—

(a)the provision which it makes under Article 19;

(b)the extent to which the services of child minders are available within the authority’s area with respect to children under the age of twelve;

(c)the provision for day care within the authority’s area made for such children by persons required to register under Article 118(1)(b).

(2) A review under paragraph (1) shall be conducted—

(a)together with [F1the Education Authority] and district councils; and

(b)at least once in every review period.

(3) In paragraph (2)(b) “review period” means the period of one year beginning with the commencement of this Article and each subsequent period of three years beginning with an anniversary of that commencement.

(4) In conducting any such review, the authority shall have regard to any exempt provision made within the authority’s area with respect to children under the age of twelve.

(5) In paragraph (4) “exempt provision” means provision to which the exemption provided by paragraph (1) or (2) of Article 121 applies (schools, hospitals and other establishments exempt from the registration requirements which apply in relation to the provision of day care).

So why is there no yearly review in Northern Ireland just two LAC reviews in thirteen years.

When I started investigation social services and tried to file my findings with the local court in Hastings, they could not find the appeal references I gave them on my appeal case as if they had never existed and was just propaganda. During this time i contacted many other people trying to help them in the area and it was not long before I came across others, some that had even worked in Social Services at the time. oddly they were informing me that not only had my social worker asked them to lie and fabricate reports she went on to make complaints to Parliament and Health Ombudsman that did nothing to change the situation. When my own case was taken to the Parliamentary and Health Omdurman and despite advising that my daughter was one of five hundred thousand or more other children that had been kidnaped / abducted and placed more than 200 miles from their family.

They tried to ignore this sending my correspondence by letter to another department all while not investigating anything. My trilogy of books was then only an idea which I never thought would actually happen there has been lots of challenges along the way to get the published notwithstanding the artwork and mastering of the Amazon publishing system which I support. Complaints to Social Work England and HCIP where a waste of time neither wanted to investigate breaches of their code finally stating the social worker was not on their register even though she was employed in Ashford working with children.

We were at an impasse on my last book and the Chancelor of the Exchequer made a statement recognizing a cohort that should not have even been in family law. He said at line 57:

“…Microsoft and Google have announced data centres worth over £3 billion. Thanks to my right hon. Friend the Business Secretary, the global investment summit unlocked £30 billion of investment….”

and later on, at 137: “Too many legal cases, particularly in family law, should never go to court, and it would cost us less if they did not, so we will spend £170 million to fund non-court resolution, reduce reoffending and digitise the court process. Too many children in care end up being looked after by unregistered providers that are much more expensive, so we will invest £165 million over the next four years to reduce that cost by increasing the capacity of the children’s homes estate.”

www.hansard.parliament.uk