• Children’s Rights Violations: Urgent Legal Concerns in the UK

    The author expresses urgent concerns to Sir Keir Starmer about legal violations regarding the relocation of children, including their own daughter, beyond permitted distances. They outline systemic failures in care services, lack of accountability from various bodies, and unresponsiveness from oversight institutions, highlighting the threat to children’s rights and well-being. Immediate intervention is deemed essential…

  • Understanding the Escalation Process for Complaints in NI

    After my complaint to the Northern Ireland Commissioner was escalated to the police, I was initially pleased. However, inquiries on September 24 revealed that the police could not find any escalation report. This prompted me to contact the Commissioner’s legal team for clarification on my complaint’s status and guidance, raising serious concerns about its handling.

  • Make a Difference: Report Police Misconduct Confidentially

    The Police Anti-Corruption and Abuse Reporting Service allows individuals to report police misconduct confidentially and respectfully. Every report contributes to addressing systemic issues within law enforcement in the UK. By participating, witnesses and victims help drive accountability and potential legal action, fostering meaningful change in the justice system.

  • Clarification Request on Breach of Parental Responsibility to Police And MoH.

    Mr. Martin Newbold expresses urgent concerns regarding the disappearance of his daughter, Emily Newbold-Smith, and ongoing issues with the Northern Ireland Police and local authorities, alleging neglect of parental rights and failure to investigate. He demands clarification on jurisdiction and legal procedures, highlighting breaches of several regulations regarding parental responsibility and education.

  • Missing Person Report: Emily Newbold-Smith

    On September 19, 2024, Martin Newbold reported his daughter Emily missing to the Northern Ireland Police. He faced jurisdictional issues and inadequate responses regarding her welfare. Newbold expressed concerns about the care system and claimed institutional fraud and toxic judicial Procedures interfering with his communication with Emily. He requested official updates on the investigation and…

  • Concerns with institutional fraud and toxic judicial proceedings in Executive Agency’s in NI

    Severe concerns about institutional fraud and toxic judicial practices affecting families, including his daughter. He calls for an investigation into public fund misuse and negligence, citing previous communications that were ignored. Newbold seeks international oversight to address these critical issues and threatens to escalate to the media if no action is taken.

  • Toxic Judicial Proceedings and Apathy to help or contact children in dire need of help from system not fit for purpose

    Mr. Martin Newbold alerts the NICCY Legal Team regarding the urgent and detrimental impact of judicial proceedings affecting his daughter. He expresses concern over a lack of communication about whether NICCY has met with her and requests immediate disclosure of this information. Newbold emphasizes the need for transparency to protect children’s rights in Northern Ireland.

  • Judicial Accountability in Northern Ireland: A Call for Action

    Mr. Martin Newbold writes to Northern Ireland’s Commissioner for Children and Young People, expressing concern over unaddressed complaints regarding child mental health support and Newry Social Services’ legal failures. He references significant case law highlighting judicial accountability, urging prompt action in response to alleged fraud and the unlawful handling of court proceedings that have harmed…

  • Fraud Allegations Against HHJ Watkins: Key Insights

    The case of McMeel v Gissing-McMeel involves Sian Gissing-McMeel successfully suing Judge HHJ Myles Watkins for fraud, resulting in a £12,500 judgment. It highlights the complexities of judicial accountability, confidentiality breaches, and the balance between privacy rights and public interest, emphasizing the judiciary’s necessity for integrity and transparency.

  • Everyone is asking on twitter “Can I sue a Judge?”

    Malibu Dallas tells us on twitter that A judge must act within his jurisdiction regarding the subject matter, or he/she will lose immunity from civil actions for such acts. This principle was established in Davis v. Burris, 220 Ariz., 75 P.2d. Generally, judges are immune from suits for judicial acts within their jurisdiction, even if…