-
Demand for Justice: Unlawful Removal of My Daughter
The letter addresses judicial misconduct concerning the unlawful removal of Martin Newbold’s daughter, Emily. It highlights a breach of jurisdiction by Judge Hollis, details government inaction as institutional negligence, and demands information on Emily’s whereabouts, legal bases for her removal, and an investigation into judicial conduct.
-
Demand for Accountability in Children’s Education and Welfare
Mr. Martin Newbold expresses serious concerns regarding the Department for Education’s concealment of information impacting his child’s welfare. He highlights failures in transparency, accountability, and timely disclosure, alleging institutional negligence and breaches of statutory obligations. Newbold demands clarification on unanswered correspondence and disputes regarding his daughter’s educational situation, emphasizing potential child abuse issues.
-
Addressing FCA’s Inaction: Child Trust Fund Concerns
To:Financial Conduct Authority6 Queen StreetLeedsWest YorkshireLS1 2TW Cc:Prudential Regulation AuthorityBank of EnglandThreadneedle StreetLondon, EC2R 8AH Cc:Financial Ombudsman ServiceExchange TowerLondon E14 9SR 0800 023 4567 independent.assessor@financial-ombudsman.org.uk Subject: Case Number: 1741 7947 6145 5930 – Nationwide Building SocietyDate Lodged: 14 March 2025EASS Reference: #250323-000005Additional References: 16th April 2025 Dear Data Protection Officer / Dame Julian Guy,FSO FCA Prudential Bank Re: Court Case…
-
📢 LETTER SENT: Department for Education – NO COMPLIANCE
The letter addresses the Department of Education regarding non-compliance and emphasizes the significance of oblique intent in endangering children. It asserts that officials must be held accountable for foreseeable harm, even without direct intention. The correspondence highlights that the lack of educational provision for children under the department’s oversight violates legal and welfare standards.
-
📢 LETTER SENT: LGSO– NO COMPLIANCE
Concerns were escalated to the Local Government Social Service Ombudsman regarding a lack of transparency and accountability in child welfare. Issues include failure to provide information and potential profit motives in child removals. Demands for answers by April 18, 2025, will involve multiple oversight bodies. This situation raises critical legal and ethical questions about the…
-
“Why Are Those Failing in Their Legal Duties in Children’s Services Being Rewarded, Not Investigated?”
The content raises critical questions regarding the failure of local authorities to implement reforms designed to safeguard vulnerable families. Despite government assurances, systemic issues persist, including secrecy and lack of transparency in child protection cases. The call for accountability is urgent, highlighting the need for proper oversight, mandatory reviews, and protections against deceptive practices in…
-
The Stealing of Emily: When Justice is on Trial
Originally published at thestealingofemily.co.uk We reported on The Stealing of Emily amid a raft of new sentencing guidelines being rapidly introduced—rules which, if enforced, could have led to different outcomes in the criminal justice system based on a person’s age, sex, or ethnicity. In response to this, Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood attempted to pass emergency…
-
Letter to Department of Education today
On 12th April 2025, Martin Newbold submitted a cover letter regarding his daughter Emily Catherine Newbold-Smith under reference 2025-0012619. He provided her Medical Card as evidence of parental relationship and raised concerns about potential fraud regarding unprovided educational funds. He requests confirmation of receipt.
-
The Stealing of Emily Drama
The Stealing of Emily is now live on Smash Media, featuring fully written Series 1 and 2, with Series 3 underway. This intense drama, inspired by Martin Newbold’s book series, follows a father’s battle against a secretive UK family court system after his daughter is taken away. It explores themes of justice and institutional betrayal.
-
Legal Appeal for Access to Educational Records: Emily’s Case Explained
Martin Newbold is seeking educational records and funding details for his daughter, Emily, from age 11 to 18, citing a court order from Judge Hollis. He contests the department’s refusal and seeks clarification on education provided, funding received, and responsibilities owed under the law, emphasizing concerns related to safeguarding and a missing person context.