thestealingofemily.co.uk

Blog

thestealingofemily.co.uk/

Profile

thestealingofemily.co.uk/autho

Homepage

facebook.com/groups/3456423188

  • Failure to identify the claimed parliamentary rule

    Is this because they seem to run care comes? You have been asked to identify the parliamentary rule that supposedly prevents you from addressing the safeguarding concerns raised about my daughter, Emily. Despite 640 MPs being contacted, I have not received a substantive response providing: Where is Emily?Failure to answer an email does not itself…

  • A legacy of child abuse is passed to Andy Burnham

    Ed Balls, while you were Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families, your Government introduced the safeguarding target regime and associated policies that placed legal and managerial pressure on local authorities. My daughter Emily was removed following proceedings that I contend relied on reports that had been improperly “sexed up.” I continue to ask:…

  • Apology not accepted Sir Kier Starmer for a shameful government.

    The prime minister apologised in the Commons on Tuesday 2nd July 2026 to women forced to give up their babies and to those separated from their mothers at birth by a system of forced adoptions that targeted unmarried women between 1949 and 1976. Starmer said the state bore responsibility for ‘funding and legitimising’ the practice…

  • Kiers Starmers abuse of Children and Parents a legacy

    The content discusses concerns over recent family court and social care reforms that, while aimed at child safety, may lead to misuse against parental rights. Communication with MPs regarding a missing child, Emily, highlights unaddressed safeguarding issues and an accountability gap within state oversight, emphasizing the need for solid evidential safeguards.

  • Mistakes in Child Protection: An Open Letter to Social Work England

    A parent, Martin Newbold, expresses urgent concerns to Social Work England about the handling of his missing daughter, Emily. He alleges failures in safeguarding, misleading reporting by social workers, and ineffective local authority processes. He requests evidence of Emily’s safety and seeks accountability regarding social worker conduct in her case.

  • Prime minister Apologized to Epstein Victims

    On February 5, 2026, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer apologized to Jeffrey Epstein’s victims at Horntye Park Sports Complex, acknowledging previous misjudgments regarding Peter Mandelson. His statements raised public interest issues amid police restrictions on further disclosures. Ongoing requests for information suggest a demand for transparency regarding related matters in Parliament.

  • Fabian Society Members in the Labour Party (2026)

    The Fabian Society’s early advocacy for state intervention in child welfare has been misinterpreted as a call for the state to replace parents. Originally, the intent was to provide a safety net for children facing abuse and neglect amid 19th-century issues like child labor and poverty, not to undermine parental authority.

  • Well, you view the optics and answer the question is this case of body snatchers?

    The case contains a substantial number of anomalies, discrepancies, and unresolved questions. These issues justify scrutiny of the official narrative, but none of the individual items—or the collection as a whole—currently constitute definitive proof that Jeffrey Epstein survived or was extracted from custody.

  • Is Sir Kier Starmer inviting affiliated people PIE into his advice chain?

    Sir Keir Starmer has appointed Harriet Harman as his Adviser on Women and Girls, despite longstanding criticism of her association with the NCCL during the period when PIE was affiliated with that organisation. Harman has denied supporting PIE or lowering the age of consent below 16.

  • Breaking the Pattern: Demanding Action Before the Harm

    Concerns about child safeguarding have been consistently raised but ignored, leading to harm being confirmed later. Institutions often minimize issues, dispute records, and pass responsibility. The call is for immediate action and accountability rather than apologies post-incident, highlighting the need for a robust mechanism to ensure safeguarding responsibilities are taken seriously.