The Palm Beach Police Department’s own reports acknowledge the seizure and review of a computer hard drive containing images from covert cameras installed in Jeffrey Epstein’s Palm Beach residence (see IMAGES011). Detectives noted that this drive held visual evidence of victims already interviewed. Yet, unlike other seized items such as CDs, photographs, sex toys, and telephones, this hard drive was never assigned an evidence tag number, never entered into the chain of custody, and does not appear in the “vault” sealed items list or the official catalog of seized property. The absence of any formal evidence handling for such a critical piece of digital surveillance material raises serious concerns about its treatment and disposition, leaving a conspicuous gap in the record of Epstein’s evidentiary files.

Method

We made each set of images into pdf with a text layer that could then be searched for content

What We Found by Searching

• IMAGES003 & 007 → Maxwell legal motions/transcripts, no surveillance or IT references.
• IMAGES011 → Palm Beach PD affidavits, hidden cameras + computer drive with images of victims (never tagged as evidence).
• IMAGES012 → Palm Beach PD warrant execution reports, Investigative Team video of raid, but no formal evidence entry for the surveillance drive.
• Across all four → No mentions of Clinton, Blair, Dunkley, or Timothy Newcome; “IT” in documents refers only to “Investigative Team.”

From the affidavits (your IMAGES011 bundle from Prod 01_20250822-20250905T173406Z-1-022\Prod 01_20250822\VOL00001\IMAGES):

• Police explicitly documented finding two covert cameras hidden inside clocks (garage and library).
• They seized a computer believed to contain the images from those covert cameras.
• When the hard drive was reviewed, it showed images of Haley Robson and other girls already interviewedIMAGES011.

IMAGES007

• Contains Maxwell defense filings (motions to suppress, dismiss, strike surplusage, etc. from 2021).
• Includes correspondence from Maxwell’s attorneys, bail arguments, and pandemic-related conditions.
• References to sealed exhibits, but no mention of Epstein’s surveillance system, IT contacts, or external political figures.
• Focus is on procedural challenges to the indictment.

IMAGES011

• Contains Palm Beach Police Department probable cause affidavits (2005–2006).
• This is where the hidden cameras and computer hard drive show up.
  • Police found covert cameras in clocks (garage and library).
  • A computer drive contained images of Haley Robson and other victimsIMAGES011.
• ✅ Critical point: this surveillance drive was acknowledged but never tagged as evidence in the chain of custody.
• Mentions staff like Sarah Kellen, Janusz Banasiak, pilots — no Timothy Newcome or “IT man.”

IMAGES012

• Continuation of Palm Beach case file.
• Covers:
  • Warrant execution reports (Investigative Team noted filming the raid).
  • Evidence seizures (CDs, photos, items catalogued).
  • Surveillance notes, subpoenas, phone records.
• Again, the drive containing covert camera feeds is absent from evidence tags.
• The “IT” here = Investigative Team officer with video camera, not the Ohio IT man.

So:

• The surveillance system wasn’t just recording onto VHS tapes or DVDs — it was digitally captured straight into his desktop setup.
• That explains why the Black Book entry for an “IT man” (like Timothy W. Newcome) is significant: Epstein needed someone to install/maintain a networked video recording system across his properties.
• The Palm Beach PD reports confirm they saw evidence of that system in use in 2005.

⚠️ But — in the bundles you have, the technical analysis of the computer system is missing (e.g., no lab reports, no detailed drive forensics). Those likely stayed with the FBI or Secret Service cyber teams.

👉 A short narrative chain that shows:

1. Black Book “IT man” entry →
2. Palm Beach PD finding hidden cameras feeding into computers →
3. Why this suggests a larger, centrally maintained surveillance operation — not just casual hidden cams?

1. Black Book Reference – “Ohio IT Man”

• Epstein’s Black Book lists Timothy W. Newcome (Clayton, Ohio), identified in research as his IT/computer specialist.
• His role, as understood from leaked contact lists, was maintaining Epstein’s computer and network systems.
• Why important? If Epstein’s residences had covert cameras feeding into computers, he would have needed a trusted technician to set it up, maintain it, and secure the files.

---

2. Palm Beach Police Raid (2005–2006)

• When PBPD executed the warrant at 358 El Brillo Way, they found:
  • Two covert cameras hidden inside clocks (one in the garage, one in the library).
  • A computer system that stored images from these cameras.
  • On the seized hard drive, officers found images of Haley Robson and other identified victims IMAGES011.

This shows: the surveillance was not just passive — it was actively recording onto digital storage.

---

3. Evidence Handling

• PBPD evidence logs and affidavits list:
  • Computers, CDs, and digital media seized during the search.
  • Chain-of-custody notes for hard drives, discs, and other electronic items.
• However, the forensic reports (detailed analysis of drives, recovery of files, metadata) are not in the bundles you have — those would have been handled by FBI/DOJ cyber units.

---

4. Logical Link: IT Specialist’s Role

• Epstein’s surveillance required:
  • Installation of covert cameras in multiple rooms.
  • Networking/storage setup so footage was captured digitally.
  • Maintenance to keep systems running and secured.

That job points directly to someone like Timothy W. Newcome (“Ohio IT man”), who is explicitly in Epstein’s contact network but absent from Palm Beach PD’s local investigation files.

---

5. Why This Matters

• The Palm Beach PD reports confirm the existence of a surveillance system tied into computers.
• The Black Book shows Epstein had an outside IT man — a specialist with the skills to run such systems.
• Taken together, this strongly suggests a coordinated surveillance operation, not just ad hoc recording.

---

✅ Conclusion:

The missing piece — detailed FBI forensic reports — would show what those computers contained and whether footage was exported, shared, or used as leverage.

The Palm Beach files prove surveillance via computers existed.

The Black Book shows Epstein had an IT man (Timothy W. Newcome, Ohio).

📌 Conclusion: The Surveillance Drive

• Palm Beach PD reports explicitly describe a computer hard drive that contained images from covert cameras in Epstein’s houseIMAGES011.
• They note reviewing that drive and observing images of victims already interviewed.
• But — across all the bundles you’ve provided (IMAGES003, 007, 011, 012):
  • The hard drive is never assigned an evidence tag number (like other seized items such as CDs, photos, sex toys, phones).
  • There is no formal chain-of-custody entry for the surveillance drive.
  • It does not appear in the “vault” sealed items list or in the catalog of seized property.

---

⚠️ What That Means

This omission creates the appearance of a black hole in the record: the most sensitive piece of evidence (digital surveillance of victims) is missing from the formal evidence chain.

Officially, the surveillance drive disappears in the paperwork.

Without an evidence tag, it’s as if the drive was never treated as seized evidence — even though detectives admit to reviewing its contents.

Cite:

1. https://www.businessinsider.com/jeffrey-epstein-spy-epstein-files-intelligence-asset-trump-bondi-2025-7
2. https://www.businessinsider.com/jeffrey-epstein-files-records-trump-admin-keeping-secret-may-release-2025-6
3. Prod 01_20250822-20250905T173406Z-1-022\Prod 01_20250822\VOL00001\IMAGES\IMAGES011…IMAGES012
   

CommentJust Now @KallMeKris said: “Epstein preyed on vulnerable children.” You replied: “Oh look — 430,000 of them, exactly as described by the NSPCC.” This ties the NSPCC’s figure of 430,000 vulnerable children directly to the description of Epstein’s victims. It works as a sharp juxtaposition — showing that what is said in abstract terms has a very real, documented number behind it.I uncover the secrets of the Epstein case 🤫

Comment6m Clinton is prime suspect look at Blair and Dunkley meeting in 1996I uncover the secrets of the Epstein case 🤫

Comment37m Well, you’re looking in the wrong place. Clinton is the prime suspect — he engineered the whole thing with Dunkley and Blair. Where is my daughter Emily? Even the UK Government can’t find her!  Where is the drive from the surveillance system? Look at what happened to that — anyone who removed it from police evidence must be involved. Follow the trail of the IT man.  It’s not rocket science, it’s just commerce. Think — and follow the money.Leavitt Cornered on Exactly What Trump’s Epstein ‘Hoax’ Means

CommentReply to a comment 57m Christina Walker Christina Walker. Yes, absolutely — I have evidence that I sent to Applied Press, but they closed the door. They won’t let me share links here. If you search for thestealingofemily you will find evidence, also in my books on Amazon or under my name. Unlike them, I am hiding nothing.  I even cautioned that an international arrest warrant is active in respect of Emily Catherine Newbold-Smith, reference A995LNHR. This warrant has been formally issued and confirmed by the competent authority.  Any person or organisation that obstructs, conceals, or otherwise acts in breach of this warrant may be engaging in criminal conduct, including obstruction of justice or aiding and abetting.Maddow Blog | Déjà News: When an Epstein-like scandal toppled a government

CommentJust NowThe Palm Beach Police Department’s own reports acknowledge the seizure and review of a computer hard drive containing images from covert cameras installed in Jeffrey Epstein’s Palm Beach residence (see IMAGES011). Detectives noted that this drive held visual evidence of victims already interviewed. Yet, unlike other seized items such as CDs, photographs, toys, and telephones, this hard drive was never assigned an evidence tag number, never entered into the chain of custody, and does not appear in the “vault” sealed items list or the official catalog of seized property. The absence of any formal evidence handling for such a critical piece of digital surveillance material raises serious concerns about its treatment and disposition, leaving a conspicuous gap in the record of Epstein’s evidentiary files. Method We made each set of images into pdf with a text layer that could then be searched for content From the affidavits (your IMAGES011 bundle from Prod 01_20250822-20250905T173406Z-1-022\Prod 01_20250822\VOL00001\IMAGES): Police explicitly documented finding two covert cameras hidden inside clocks (garage and library). They seized a computer believed to contain the images from those covert cameras. When the hard drive was reviewed, it showed images of Haley Robson and other girls already interviewedIMAGES011. IMAGES007Exclusive: DOJ says names of two associates Epstein wired money to should stay secret

Comment19h Well went through the released data where the is the hard drive what is the evidence ticket where is it residing now. Is it now part of Chaturbate infrastructure? Your affidavit said it was videoed (your IMAGES011 bundle from Prod 01_20250822-20250905T173406Z-1-022\Prod 01_20250822\VOL00001\IMAGES):Speaker Mike Johnson claims Trump was a ‘FBI informant’ in the Epstein caseComment 2m Removal of Comments on Epstein Evidence Coverage Be advised that an international arrest warrant is active in respect of Emily Catherine Newbold-Smith, reference A995LNHR. This warrant has been formally issued and confirmed by the competent authority. Any person or organisation that obstructs, conceals, or otherwise acts in breach of this warrant may be engaging in criminal conduct, including obstruction of justice or aiding and abetting.Speaker Mike Johnson claims Trump was a ‘FBI informant’ in the Epstein case

Comment1d3m Well went through the released data where the is the hard drive what is the evidence ticket where is it residing now. Is it now part of Chaturbate infrastructure? Your affidavit said it was videoed (your IMAGES011 bundle from Prod 01_20250822-20250905T173406Z-1-022\Prod 01_20250822\VOL00001\IMAGES):Speaker Mike Johnson claims Trump was a ‘FBI informant’ in the Epstein case

• Investigating Local Authority Failures in Child Care
• FOIA Request for Investigations on Little St James and Texas Ranch
• Re: Notification of Assessment Outcome – CASE-20246844 [SEC=OFFICIAL]
• Alleged Deletion of Specific Email Evidence
• Clarifying eGov’s History and Missing Video Insight