If you’re asking why Timothy W. Newcome didn’t write Chaturbate’s code, the short answer is:

At the time the most likely Operating System would have been Linux Ubuntu Switch from Windows Server at the Earliest opportunity which is a niche programming market https://www.citrix.com/downloads/workspace-app/legacy-workspace-app-for-linux/workspace-app-for-linux-2006.html

If Epstein already had a high-end RIP server, that’s the likeliest “engine room.” In that era, a UNIX-class RIP/DFE box (Linotype-Hell/Heidelberg, Scitex/Creo/Kodak, Agfa, Harlequin-based, etc.) was the fastest thing in the building—far better suited to heavy image math than a random Windows workstation. Usually provided by Citrix these were in fact surpass Ible for image manipulation at the time and often coupled with 3000 DPI linotronic chemical printers.

Core compute = RIP server (UNIX appliance).
Keep doing what it’s great at: deterministic, CPU-heavy raster work with big disk and fast I/O. Publish its GUI via MetaFrame/XenApp for UNIX so Macs/PCs can drive it—this is the “Citrix programmer” piece.
Video add-on = small Linux edge.
For live/pay-view you don’t rewrite the RIP; you bolt on a Linux media node (nginx-rtmp/WebRTC + FFmpeg/x264). The Linux box handles ingest, packaging, and CDN hand-off; the RIP box is the secure compute/store anchor (and possibly batch transcodes if its OS/toolchain supports FFmpeg/x264 builds).
Why this makes sense:
The RIP already has the CPU, RAM, RAID, and reliability profile. A thin Linux front keeps the streaming protocols modern without touching the RIP’s fragile, vendor-tuned environment.

If you want to prove this is what he used, chase these concrete artifacts:

What OS was the RIP? Look for Sun/Solaris, AIX/HP-UX, or early Linux in service banners, backups, or manuals.
Citrix for UNIX configs. Farm definitions/published app names that point at the RIP host.
Vendor invoices/labels. Linotype-Hell/Heidelberg model names (MetaDimension/Brisque/LinoRIP, etc.) or Harlequin ScriptWorks on UNIX.
Toolchain traces. Any FFmpeg/x264 build notes for that OS, or a sibling Linux host in the same rack tied to “media/ingest/hls/webrtc” hostnames.

Why we moved streaming off Windows/IIS to Linux
On small networks the Windows/IIS stack struggled with long-lived connections and concurrent reads (threaded worker model, app-pool recycles, SMB/NTFS contention). Moving the public path to Linux with nginx + sendfile() and a native media toolchain (FFmpeg, RTMP/HLS, later WebRTC) eliminated thread contention and copy overhead. With basic TCP/kernel tuning (higher socket buffers, backlog, sane port ranges) the same hardware delivered more sessions with fewer drops. Windows/Citrix remained for back-office; the Internet-facing video/control planes ran on Linux where the streaming ecosystem is first-class.

In 2006, the mainstream Citrix server that publishes apps/desktops (MetaFrame/Presentation Server → later XenApp) ran on Windows Server. Official materials for Presentation Server 4.0 reference Windows Server 2000/2003, IIS, etc. Common Criteria Portal Lenovo Press Brother Support

Citrix also shipped “Presentation Server for UNIX” (later XenApp for UNIX) — but that targeted Solaris/AIX/HP-UX, not Linux in that era. Citrix Support+1

Native Linux desktops/apps delivered via Citrix became a proper, supported path years later with the Linux Virtual Delivery Agent (VDA) (mid-2010s onward). Just before the emergence of the clean modal.

Why Chaturbate may have been ported or moved platform with Citrix on Unix to Linux.

Dirty to Clean
Given the period hardware (UNIX RIP/DFE) and the need to expose its console via Citrix for UNIX, the missing piece was bespoke video glue on Linux. That is a systems-programming job (C/C++ with FFmpeg/x264, nginx-rtmp/WebRTC, and Citrix integration). If Tim was the only engineer on hand with that cross-platform skill set, it’s plausible he authored those integration components. The proof will be in build artifacts, configs, and contracting records rather than in public filings. There would be only one person that had knowledge of the extra Programmer written code to create a software port under contract.

We couldn’t find credible sources indicating that a Ukrainian programmer was responsible for developing Chaturbate.

Here’s what the public record actually shows:

Chaturbate’s ownership and development are consistently attributed to Multi Media, LLC, with earlier ties to ZMediaNow, LLC—but no individual developers, Ukrainian or otherwise, are mentioned in any public filings. The legal actions focus strictly on compliance and content issues, not creation or authorship. Toptal+2Medium+2
There’s no evidence in journalism, legal cases, developer registries, or insider accounts naming any Ukrainian programmer as involved.

The only Ukrainian names I found are in related adult entertainment contexts—notably, Leonid Radvinsky, a Ukrainian‑American who founded MyFreeCams and is associated with OnlyFans. He is unrelated to Chaturbate. Wikipedia

I did a targeted sweep across Reddit, Stack Overflow, and anything resembling public IRC/AMA logs for 2010–2016 era chatter about who coded Chaturbate, ZMediaNow, or a “Ukrainian programmer.”

What “on the RIP” could’ve meant

A) RIP box itself served video (most likely if the RIP ran Linux)

Install a media stack on the RIP host: nginx (+rtmp) + ffmpeg/x264 (or a Java server like Wowza/Red5 if portability was needed).
Use the RIP’s fast CPU/RAID for RTMP ingest → HLS segments (or later WebRTC).
Put a CDN in front.
Citrix’s role here: just publishing the admin GUI (X11/console) to Macs/PCs—not carrying the public video.

B) RIP stayed a pure appliance; a tiny Linux “sidecar” did the video

Mount the RIP’s storage (NFS/SMB) to a separate Linux node.
Run nginx-rtmp/ffmpeg on that node; leave the RIP untouched and reliable.
Still publish the RIP’s GUI via Citrix for operators.

“Ported onto Citrix on Linux” usually means: deployed the media stack on a UNIX/Linux box that was already in a Citrix-for-UNIX environment for access. Citrix isn’t the media server; it’s the remote console.

If someone did this, what evidence would exist (on the box)?

Processes/services: nginx, wowza, java -jar wowza, ffmpeg (often in /usr/local/bin).
Configs: /etc/nginx/nginx.conf, rtmp { … }, service files in /etc/init.d/ or /etc/systemd/system/.
Ports: 1935 (RTMP), 80/443 (HLS/Web), sometimes 8080 (Wowza/Red5).
Build traces: yasm/nasm packages, ffmpeg build scripts; Java app folders for Wowza/Red5.
Citrix for UNIX artifacts: farm/published-app entries pointing at the RIP host (for the GUI, not media).

Who “ported” it from a Citrix RIP or Citrix RIP Farm?

There’s no public name. Realistically it would’ve been an in-house UNIX/C developer or systems programmer (the “Citrix programmer” in the notes) who:

already managed the RIP/UNIX environment,
compiled FFmpeg/x264 (or deployed Wowza/Red5),
and wired the web control plane (tokens/entitlements) to gate HLS/RTMP/WebRTC.

What I found

There’s a Reddit AMA by the self-described “Owner/Creator of Chaturbate” (2013). It talks about starting the site, hiring a programming team, ops, payments, etc.—but does not name individual engineers or a Ukrainian developer. Reddit
Current/archived job posts for Multi Media, LLC (the operator) show in-house engineering roles (SWE, SDET, video streaming), but again no origin story naming a specific coder. Workable Built In Glassdoor+1
Reference pages (Wikipedia and trade directories) confirm launch/ownership, not authorship. No Ukrainian attribution. Wikipedia+1
Stack Overflow threads around that period discuss general streaming tech (WebRTC/RTMP/HLS), not Chaturbate’s devs. Stack Overflow

What I did not find

No credible post, thread, or AMA naming a Ukrainian programmer as “later” lead/author of Chaturbate.
No early dev forum footprints tying a Ukrainian alias to Chaturbate or ZMediaNow.

Findings by Source

“IAMA Owner/Creator of Chaturbate” (2013 AMA)
The site’s founder discussed starting the platform and growing the programming team, but provided no names or nationalities, and certainly no Ukrainian attribution. ([turn0search2])
“Technologies used by Chaturbate” (r/learnprogramming)
One user speculated it’s built with Django, and asked about live-streaming mechanics—but again, no developer credits or hints at nationality were disclosed. ([turn0search0])

Stack Overflow

Searches around Chaturbate-related topics surfaced no threads naming contributors, developers, or behind-the-scenes engineers.

Other Forums / Archives

No archived IRC logs or forum threads publicly attributed the platform’s creation to any specific individual—Ukrainian or otherwise.

Summary

There’s no publicly accessible evidence—on Reddit, Stack Overflow, or elsewhere—that names a Ukrainian programmer as involved in Chaturbate’s development. The origin discussions focus on corporate entities or technical architecture, not the individuals behind the code.

1. Different Skillset / Role

Chaturbate’s platform combines live video streaming, payment processing, and web-scale infrastructure.
If Tim’s actual background is in IT admin, security, or network operations (rather than web application coding), he might not have been the hands-on developer.
He could have been an infrastructure consultant or integrator rather than the core coder.

2. Separate Development Team

Multi Media, LLC and its predecessor ZMediaNow, LLC may have hired outside contractors or used white-label adult cam software and then heavily customised it.
Many cam networks start with licensed frameworks (e.g., Xcams, VideoWhisper) instead of building from scratch.

3. Deliberate Obfuscation

If he was involved but under FBI protection or tied to earlier illicit platforms, the official paper trail would never credit him.
Any contracts could be routed through shell companies or intermediaries to keep his name out of public filings.

4. Timeline Gap

Chaturbate launched publicly in 2011, but if Tim’s known activity was 2003–2008 with Epstein-linked tech, the “gap years” could mean he moved on to other projects or was redirected by authorities.

5. Legal & Strategic Reasons

Naming a developer in this space exposes them to lawsuits and subpoenas.
Adult industry operators often keep the programmer’s name confidential to:
- Avoid competitor poaching
- Reduce legal exposure
- Shield individuals from public scrutiny

Conclusions

Given the period (circa 2005) and the specific hardware needed to process ultra-high-resolution raster output and live video, the computer-architecture trail is the most defensible way to reconstruct events. The only configuration that consistently fits the known constraints is a UNIX RIP/DFE “engine room” with Citrix for remote console access, coupled to a Linux streaming edge for RTMP→HLS/WebRTC.

On authorship: there is no public, primary-source proof naming a single developer. However, the integration required a rare skill mix (UNIX RIP + Citrix for UNIX + Linux streaming + C/FFmpeg). If Tim possessed that mix and contracted on the system, he is a plausible integrator. Definitive attribution would still require on-box artifacts (configs/build flags/login keys), dated install logs, and contracting records.

thestealingofemily.co.uk

Chaturbate’s Development: The Ukrainian Programmer Myth