Subscribe to get access

Comment2h We’re still waiting for Trump—or any world leader—to answer the real question: Where are the 430,000 children missing from the UK system? Children as young as four—vanished without trace. Trafficked through a system built under the guise of “child protection” but really orchestrated through state-sponsored adoption campaigns, like the one born out of Blair House. Ask yourself: Who profits when poor children are removed, Who’s funding “education” for the rich with the lives of the voiceless? Until these leaders answer that, everything else is distraction.Opinion: Trump is marooned on Epstein’s island

Comment21h If you’re not involved, why are you not providing all of this information? 430,000 children are missing from the UK’s care and family court system. Are these politicians obstructing Epstein disclosures because they know some of those children were trafficked? Are they involved in their disappearance?  Where are they now?Obama Responds to Trumps Treason Accusations

Comment22h Mr president why did you promise us release of information? 430,000 children are missing from the UK’s care and family court system.  Are these politicians obstructing Epstein disclosures because they know some of those children were trafficked? Are they involved in their disappearance? Where are they now?Everything Trump Has Done That Critics Say Is Meant To Distract From Epstein Scandal

Comment22h 430,000 children are missing from the UK’s care and family court system. Are these politicians obstructing Epstein disclosures because they know some of those children were trafficked? Are they involved in their disappearance? Are they linked to Epstein preparing his second island?1 Reply‘Release it all, do it yesterday’: Chris Cuomo on Epstein mishandling

Comment22h Where are the missing children? Why won’t you tell us? 430,000 children are missing from the UK’s care and family court system. We need everything out in the open up until end 2010 and then what happened after where are the children some four years old. Are these politicians obstructing Epstein disclosures because they know some of those children were trafficked? Are they involved in their disappearance?Judges deem Trump motions to unseal Epstein and Maxwell grand jury transcripts inadequate

Comment22h Where are the missing children? Why won’t you tell us?430,000 children are missing from the UK’s care and family court system. Are these politicians obstructing Epstein disclosures because they know some of those children were trafficked? Are they involved in their disappearance? This isn’t just about Epstein—it’s about accountability.  Every delay, every block, every early recess looks like complicity.Judge overseeing DOJ Epstein grand jury records request asks for more information

Comment1d 430,000 children are missing from the UK’s care and family court system. Are these politicians obstructing Epstein disclosures because they know some of those children were trafficked? Are they involved in their disappearance?  This isn’t just about Epstein—it’s about accountability. Every delay, every block, every early recess looks like complicity. Where are the missing children? Why won’t you tell us?Trump tries to distract from Epstein by casually accusing Obama of treason

Comment1d Perhaps she could inform us why Epstein was preparing the other island in 2009. Was this for the 430,000 UK children that are missing from the UK?Trump: ‘Didn’t know’ DOJ reached out to Ghislaine Maxwell

Comment1d Where are the missing children? Why won’t you tell us?430,000 children are missing from the UK’s care and family court system. Are these politicians obstructing Epstein disclosures because they know some of those children were trafficked? Are they involved in their disappearance? This isn’t just about Epstein—it’s about accountability. Every delay, every block, every early recess looks like complicity.Fight Over Epstein Disclosures Brings House to Standstill

Comment1d He may be shielding political donors, judges, corporate leaders, or even colleagues who are named in the documents — regardless of whether they’re guilty of crimes or just associated with Epstein. 🧩 Motive: Political self-preservation and institutional loyalty. Because transparency is dangerous to the powerful, even if they’re not guilty of crimes. It risks: Is this perverting Justice? Shaming political donors Opening lawsuits Unmasking complicity-by-silence Revealing how wide Epstein’s reach really was11 repliesSpeaker Mike Johnson Won’t Allow House Vote On Jeffrey Epstein Files

Comment2d “Let’s be clear—this is exactly what the UK government has done: thrown truth under the bus and relied on thin evidence to deflect accountability. The wealthy individuals panicking over being linked to these island flights seem oblivious to the facts. What’s been released as ‘flight data’ amounts to little more than handwritten tail numbers—no passenger names, no confirmations. It’s superficial at best. Worse still, the timeline is deliberately narrow. Why does this so-called transparency end before 2009?”‘Ask the FBI’: WH Throws Kash Patel Under the Bus on Epstein

Comment3d A document titled Government Exhibit 662 -RR S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) contains a handwritten flight log, which I’ve reviewed in full — 118 pages.  It’s important to note that UK flights are missing from this version. The PDF that’s been widely circulated appears to have been sanitised at the CSV data level, not simply redacted in the PDF layer. This means UK references were likely removed before the export.  The result is a clean-looking digital file that gives the impression of transparency but omits critical data — particularly from 2009. I obtained my copy from journalist Ben Wieder (McClatchy Washington Bureau). It was created 12/20/2021 and last updated 2/19/2023. These omissions deserve scrutiny.‘They’re dodging accountability’: Epstein survivor calls for release of files

Comment3d This comment was deleted because it didn’t meet our guidelinesGOP Rep Worries About The ‘Innocent’ Wealthy Friends Who Flew On Epstein’s ‘Dadgum Plane’

Comment3d Where Are the Missing UK Children? Why Are the Flight Logs Incomplete? Why are UK flight records missing from the Epstein flight logs? Why was Jeffrey Epstein preparing a second island in 2009—just one year before my daughter disappeared? In the UK, over 430,000 children have been taken from their families under social services and court orders—yet these children are missing from financial tracing, including their Child Trust Funds. This is the same figure referenced by the NSPCC in 2015.  So where are they? Why has there been no follow-through by UK authorities, despite evidence, timelines, and matching numbers? And what is happening now on the islands? Little St. James and Great St. James were not just retreats—they were being expanded. Who were they preparing for? We deserve answers. Parents deserve answers. The children deserve to be found. #Epstein #MissingChildren #ChildTrustFund #UKSocialServices #WhereIsEmily #FlightLogs #NSPCC #GreatStJames #LittleStJames #GovernmentAccountabilityEpstein Victim Twice Named Trump to Law Enforcement

Comment4d Well Pam Why has no one asked what happened next. Was the island sold for the victim’s fund? NO. There is a credible and concerning timeline overlap between Epstein’s development and operations on Great Saint James (2009–2019) and Emily’s documented removal from her home and legal guardianship (2009–2010). At the time Epstein is described as improving the second Island. What for? Why is the no information about the new owner. Whether any flight logs, visitor entries, or construction crew records exist for either island during the period 2008 to 2011, and if they can be reviewed in light of this child’s disappearance. Whether your office is aware of any UK or BVI-linked movements of minors to or from Little or Great Saint James during that timeframe. If so, whether a request can be made to preserve or re-examine digital records, including security logs, as part of an international safeguarding concern.Pam Bondi passed on Epstein prosecution as Florida AG: Law professor

Comment5d When did FBI Director Kash Patel and Attorney General Pam Bondi become more powerful than President Trump?, perhaps Shes not a mother and has no sympathy for my cause and the 440000 children’s victims, for flight data and is unaware of perceived errors of data gaps in the court flight log Government Exhibit 662 -RRS2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)  Key Points from Extracted Data: 📅 May 3, 1996 Flights 4417–4420 Route: Dublin → Waterford Oddity: Waterford is listed as being in the United Kingdom, which is incorrect. Waterford is in the Republic of Ireland, not part of the UK. Implication: This could suggest false jurisdictional labelling, possibly to bypass customs, immigration, or legal oversight. Flights 4421–4422 Route: Waterford (labelled UK) → Paris Implication: The mislabeling may have allowed international transfers to France to appear as UK–EU flights, potentially bypassing Dublin oversight entirely. 📅 May 5, 1997 Flight 4822 Route: London → Geneva Note: Geneva has been a hotspot for offshore accounts, diplomatic immunity, and opaque international dealings. The timing and route could suggest connections to finance or political networks. Further insight 🇬🇧 UK Flights Identified 📅 May 3, 1996 4417–4420: Dublin → Waterford (mislabeled as “Ireland, United Kingdom”) 4421–4422:Waterford → Paris Note: Waterford is in Republic of Ireland, not the UK, but is labelled here as UK. 📅 May 5, 1997 4822: London → Geneva 📅 June 8, 1999 5524:London → Teterboro, New Jersey (USA) ✈️ This is a direct transatlantic flight from the UK to the US. Likely private jet. 📅 June 9, 1999 5525:Teterboro → London 🧭 Return flight from the US to the UK. Very rare in logs. 📅 June 15, 1999 5531: Teterboro → London 📅 June 16, 1999 5532:London → Teterboro ❗Four UK-linked flights in just over a week. Highly unusual frequency. 📅 April 3, 2001 6216: Teterboro → London 📅 April 4, 2001 6217: London → Teterboro 📅 April 25, 2002 6428: Teterboro → London 📅 April 26, 2002 6429: London → TeterboroBondi Ordered FBI to Flag Trump’s Name in Epstein Files

Comment5d Thank you, President Trump, However Still Asking: Where Are the UK Flight Records? Between 2006 and 2013, multiple airfields including RAF Fairford, RAF Northolt, Norfolk sites, Farnborough, and Luton show unexplained gaps in available flight data. Why are UK departures and arrivals absent from public logs—especially those tied to international travel and diplomatic routes?  We believe these missing records could help explain how thousands of children disappeared from oversight during this time.  This is a call to former aviation staff, data archivists, and civil servants: 📁 If you have information, archived flight paths, or clearance logs, please step forward. 🧭 Some of these routes may have connected to Caribbean islands or involved intermediate stops via Paris, Dublin, or small airstrips. This is not about politics. It’s about truth, records, and justice. Let’s find the flights. Let’s find the answers.Trump Sues Over Wall Street Journal’s Epstein Report

Comment5d🔍 Still Asking: Where Are the UK Flight Records? Between 2006 and 2013, multiple airfields including RAF Fairford, RAF Northolt, Norfolk sites, Farnborough, and Luton show unexplained gaps in available flight data.  Why are UK departures and arrivals absent from public logs—especially those tied to international travel and diplomatic routes?  We believe these missing records could help explain how thousands of children disappeared from oversight during this time. This is a call to former aviation staff, data archivists, and civil servants: 📁 If you have information, archived flight paths, or clearance logs, please step forward . 🧭 Some of these routes may have connected to Caribbean islands or involved intermediate stops via Paris, Dublin, or small airstrips. This is not about politics. It’s about truth, records, and justice. Let’s find the flights. Let’s find the answers.Under pressure, House Republicans consider vote on Epstein file

Comment6d We’re continuing to ask questions. Between 2006–2013, certain UK flight records are conspicuously absent — including routes through RAF Fairford, Norfolk airfields, and terminals like Farnborough and Luton. If released, these logs may help clarify movements during a time when hundreds of thousands of children went unaccounted for. This isn’t about politics — it’s about truth and answers. Anyone with knowledge or archived data on those flights: please step forward.Dem Sen. Ron Wyden claims ‘big’ Epstein file ‘full of actionable information’ locked in Treasury Department drawer

Comment6d This is encouraging news — please help me. We are searching for additional UK flight records, and if it’s possible to release this information, it could reveal a great deal. It would also help demonstrate that President Trump supports families and protective action, and if we can locate the details behind the 430,000 missing children, it would be a breakthrough. We’re especially seeking flight data between 2006 and 2013, including:  Departures and arrivals at RAF Fairford, Norfolk airfields, and RAF Northolt  Flights using private or military terminals at Farnborough, Luton, and Biggin Hill Routes with indirect stopovers, possibly disguising final destinations — for example, London > Dublin > Paris > Caribbean These UK flights appear missing from the published records, yet may hold critical information on where and how so many children disappeared from public oversight. We ask: Who was on board? Why were these logs excluded? And how many lives could be explained or restored through truth?Trump Calls for Release of ‘Pertinent’ Epstein Grand Jury Material Following WSJ Article

CommentJul 16This comment was deleted because it didn’t meet our guidelinesEpstein dumpster fire has MAGA ‘eating its own’: Trump fumbling as he blames AG for his secrecy

CommentJul 16This comment was deleted because it didn’t meet our guidelinesTrump Just Called Epstein Truth-Seekers “Pretty Bad People”

CommentJul 16 Why if it’s blocked why is their lists of flights linked on my website. Then that doesn’t seem very true that the information is blocked. I have reviewed it and noted error in flight logs EPSTEIN FLIGHT LOGS UNREDACTED.pdf. and handwritten exhibit Government Exhibit 662 -RR S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) epstein-flight-logs-released-in-usa-vs-maxwell.pdf   Thats is not and never been my question I have even asked ONS to provide the UK flights 6th June 2025 for any flight logs, visitor entries, or construction crew records exist for either island during the period 2008 to 2011?House Republicans who blocked release of Epstein files named

Reply to a commentJul 14 Who said any think about being either follower or not surely the truth of the UK flights is important here and why they are missing from DOJ did Epstein Walk to the UK? or is that what we are expected to believe?Maddow Blog | On Jeffrey Epstein, Trump rolls out a new conspiracy theory about the conspiracy theory

CommentJul 14 In 2010, contact with my daughter Emily was unlawfully severed in the UK. I appealed to US officials — including Attorney General Pam Bondi — for help tracing potential UK-to-Caribbean flights from 2009–2011 that may relate to her disappearance.2 repliesMaddow Blog | On Jeffrey Epstein, Trump rolls out a new conspiracy theory about the conspiracy theory

CommentJul 14 This comment was deleted because it didn’t meet our guidelinesMaddow Blog | On Jeffrey Epstein, Trump rolls out a new conspiracy theory about the conspiracy theory

CommentJul 14 From 2003 onward, there are no recorded departures or arrivals involving London, the UK, or any UK territory listed in this log. Download the DOJ version here Government Exhibit  662 -RR S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) The listing of Waterford under UK records may reflect deeper inconsistencies. Regional hops (e.g., Dublin → Waterford → Paris) were frequently used for obfuscation. These 1996–1997 entries align with key European activity. Major UK airfields like Heathrow or RAF Northolt are no longer listed — raising questions about redacted or omitted flight records and the identities of those involved. The UK traffic has been cleanly removed or redacted but simply deleted before export. Gone are flights to and from Luton (EGGW), Heathrow (EGLL), or RAF Northolt. Gone too are names tied to these flights,‘Final Straw’: Musk Rips DOJ Over Epstein Client List

Comment Jul 12 I am writing to request urgent clarification and access to statistical records concerning international UK-linked flight data, particularly those pertaining to the period between 2002 and 2015. As part of a public investigation into the disappearance of my daughter, Emily Cathryn Newbold Smith, I have been reviewing publicly released documents — including the Epstein-Maxwell flight logs — which show a series of recorded flights from and to London and Waterford up to 2002, but no UK-linked entries thereafter. Whether any flight logs, visitor entries, or construction crew records exist for either island during the period 2008 to 2011, and if they can be reviewed in light of this child’s disappearance. Whether your office is aware of any UK or BVI-linked movements of minors to or from Little or Great Saint James during that timeframe. If so, whether a request can be made to preserve or re-examine digital records, including security logs, as part of an international safeguarding concern.Pam Bondi faces pressure from conservatives in Epstein files fallout