Today I escalated serious concerns to the Local Government Social Service Ombudsman. Under reference DS485689638GB.

🔴 Failed to provide LOCATION of Emily Catherine Newbold-Smith
🔴 Ignored requests for confirmation on LAC payments received
🔴 Refused to acknowledge a child’s placement or legal basis for such
🔴 Shown zero transparency, despite Parliamentary admissions of public funds involved

📌 This is no longer administrative delay. It begins to meet the legal threshold of oblique intention—where foreseeable harm is wilfully ignored.

🛑 Are children being removed from families for profit?

📝 I have demanded answers by 18 April 2025. This issue is now being referred to:

➡️ Serious Fraud Office
➡️ United Nations Human Rights
➡️ ICO, OVIC, IBAC
➡️ The Hague & other international judicial bodies

Enough is enough. The silence ends here.

#EducationCrisis #ChildWelfare #PublicAccountability #ObliqueIntention #LAC #HumanRights #EmilyCatherineNewboldSmith #DepartmentForEducation #TransparencyNow #DataProtection #ParentalRights

It is now necessary to state this unequivocally and for the legal record:

He INTENDS to endanger children even indirectly though OBLIQUE INTENT, which is where they may not have direct intention but know the consequences of their actions, which are still actionable causes and motive.
This standard must now be applied to officials and departments who act with foreseeable knowledge of harm, even if not by direct instruction. It is not possible for your department to remain unaware that the absence of education provision for a child under its knowledge or funding oversight constitutes a violation of law, duty, and child welfare standards.

• Understanding the Complexity of Peerage Revocation and NCA
• Corruption Investigations: IBAC’s Limitations Explained
• Child Trafficking Concerns and the EHCR
• Guide Series How to Report Child Abduction a complete Procedure
• Reinvestigating Child Exploitation Cases: Operation BeaconPort