1st April 2025

Three families have suffered immeasurably due to the actions of Judge Hollis, whose decisions remain uninvestigated despite clear indications of criminal misconduct. During the Hastings court proceedings, social worker Christine Elizabeth Stirling presented genealogical information that was not only inaccurate but appeared deliberately constructed to mislead the court and support her own agenda.

The key issue lies in the genogram itself. The document titled “Genogram_re_Lauren’s_family_19_08_10”, prepared by Charlotte Bell for East Sussex County Council, contains fundamentally incorrect information. It incorrectly identifies Emilys sister Lauren’s father, when in reality, her father is David Cunningham, and her full name is Lauren Anne Cunningham. Despite this clear and crucial error, the same misleading information was presented during court proceedings. This raises serious questions: why was this false narrative allowed to stand, and who was accountable for presenting this incorrect data in such a critical legal setting?

This is more than just an error—it is a deliberate act that has far-reaching consequences for Lauren and her family, and for all those involved in the case. The failure to investigate the false information presented and the refusal to hold those responsible accountable further undermines the integrity of the legal system.

If a judge has acted outside their jurisdiction or has relied on fraudulent information to make a decision, they should be held accountable. The system should not allow such actions to go unchallenged. The consequences of these errors or intentional misdeeds can deeply affect the lives of individuals and families, and those responsible must be brought before a higher authority to answer for their actions. Legal accountability and transparency are fundamental to ensuring justice is served fairly.

The genealogical information presented by social worker Christine Elizabeth Stirling during the Hastings court proceedings, overseen by Judge Hollis, was not only inaccurate but appeared deliberately constructed to mislead the court and advance her own agenda. Notably, the data presented in Stirling’s genogram did not appear in the document titled ‘Genogram_re_Lauren’s_family_19_08_10,’ which was written by Charlotte Bell for East Sussex Local Authority. This inconsistency further demonstrates the fabrication of information solely created by Stirling, raising profound concerns about accountability and justice within the system.

It seems Christine Elizabeth Stirling Social Worker whole agenda fabricated for this family, which was not a respondent named on the court papers from the outset. Who had no connection to the children other than Catherine moved there with Lauren.

The system’s continued refusal to investigate this troubling inconsistency only deepens concerns about the lack of transparency and justice. Families deserve the truth, and they deserve a fair process. It’s time to demand answers and hold the system accountable.

As explored in The Stealing of Emily, case law supports the notion that a judge can lose immunity when they act outside their jurisdiction or rely on fraudulent information. In Davis v. Burris, 220 Ariz., 75 P.2d, it was established that a judge’s immunity is void when acting beyond their jurisdiction. Similarly, in Gregory v. Thomson, 500 F.2d 59, the court affirmed that immunity does not apply when a judge acts in clear absence of jurisdiction. Additionally, Cooper v. O’Donnell and Fidelity & Guarantee Co. underscore that even wrongful actions taken in good faith may still result in liability.

The failure to investigate such issues raises serious concerns: Was the fraudulent information deliberately used to influence the judge’s decision? Why has the system failed to hold those responsible accountable? These unanswered questions demonstrate the urgent need for transparency, integrity, and accountability within our legal system.

Why was this false narrative allowed to stand unchallenged in court? Was it an intentional act to mislead the judge and influence the outcome? The system’s continued refusal to investigate this troubling inconsistency only deepens concerns about accountability and justice. It’s time to demand answers. #JusticeForFamilies #Accountability #TheStealingOfEmily

@followers @highlight