Regulation 8(1) cannot dispense with any complaint pertaining to statutory duty that the local authority may have to the individual. Otherwise, there would be a perverse incentive to tie a person up into proceedings so as to neglect statutory duties to them and there is a risk of neglecting your duties during Proceedings

The Children Act 1989 guidance and regulations guidance and regulations Volume Care Planning Case Review July 2021 by the Department for education

Which does not permit a local authority to disregard its statutory duties to an individual simply because they are involved in ongoing proceedings. If this were the case, it could indeed create a problematic incentive for authorities to engage individuals in legal processes in a way that could allow them to evade or delay their statutory responsibilities.

The Children Act 1989 Guidance and Regulations, specifically the Volume 2: Care Planning, Placement and Case Review (July 2021), published by the Department for Education, emphasizes the local authority’s obligations to maintain high standards of care and safeguard the welfare of children in all circumstances, including during proceedings.

This guidance clarifies that:

1. Statutory Responsibilities Remain Constant: Local authorities have a continuous duty to fulfill their responsibilities as per statutory requirements, irrespective of legal proceedings. This includes maintaining appropriate care plans, regular case reviews, and ensuring the welfare of the child is the primary focus.
2. Proceedings Should Not Interrupt Duties: Even when involved in complex legal proceedings, the guidance highlights that authorities must not let these interfere with their responsibilities to the child or their family. There should be no neglect or delay in the delivery of services or support that the child or family is entitled to.
3. Risk of Duty Neglect During Proceedings: The guidance cautions against the risk of duties being overlooked or delayed due to legal proceedings, thereby safeguarding individuals’ rights and well-being.

If you’re encountering a situation where you feel statutory duties are being neglected under the pretext of ongoing proceedings, referencing these points within the Children Act 1989 guidance may reinforce the need for the authority to uphold its obligations continuously.

Here is the link to the resource: The Children Act 1989 Guidance and Regulations Volume 2.

You will note that we have already covered the regulations in regard to providing contract law of care for your cl under Estoppel here ICO Intervention on ESCC’s Information Withholding – thestealingofemily.co.uk Lucy Letby Case: Legal Implications on Emily case and Family Rights – thestealingofemily.co.uk

Recent posts

• November 3, 2024 Formal Claim of Negligence and Request for International Review and ‘Wrongful’ Separation under Regulation 26 Serious harm
• November 2, 2024 Investigation into Complaint Against Police
• October 19,2024 The Pursuit of Truth and Justice in the Face of Adversity
• October 17,2024 Writ of Habeas Corpus and Writ of Attachment.
• October 15,2024The Hidden Costs of Care: Council Debt and the Impact on Children’s Services
• October 12,2024 Understanding Habeas Corpus and Child Custody Cases
• October 4,2024 Malpractice in Child Welfare: A Father’s Plea for Justice
• October 1,2024 Default Notice and Notice of Serious Misconduct
• October 1, 2024 Addressing NICCY: Negligence in Welfare Cases of Children
• September 19, 2024 Fraud Allegations Against HHJ Watkins: Key Insights
• September 18, 2024 “Can I sue a Judge?”
• September 6, 2024Challenges in Data Protection and Stakeholder Engagement at Southern Regional College
• March 26, 2024THE STEALING OF EMILY – Closed Material Procedures (‘secret courts’).
• September 6, 2024Potential Criminal Concerns at Southern Regional College: Need for Investigation
• September 6, 2024Urgent Assistance Needed: Resolving Data Protection and Stakeholder Engagement Issues at Southern Regional College

Everyone is asking on twitter: “Can I sue a Judge?”

Yes, you can in very slim circumstances If a judge creates a court order based on that fraudulent affidavit, the judge has also committed a felony. Anyone attempting to enforce an illegal court order is, in effect, committing an act of violence against you.

What is an affidavit: a written statement confirmed by oath or affirmation, for use as evidence in court.

If these articles have impacted you, please be courageous and comment on the page. If you have faced legal frustrations, consider adding your case to those who feel the system is broken. Please note that this is on a secure server and requires validation data, which will be compared with the Family man database to ensure submissions can be verified. Do not hold back your emotions; this situation is truly horrific and evil. If you are not seeing the survey below this might mean you need to try a different Internet browser:

The Stealing of Emily – Review of cases for illegal Separation. | Crowdsignal.com (survey)