HIDDEN BY CLINTON LIBRARY TO COVER UP CRIMES
On 1 September 2025, I was informed that searches had identified responsive material and provided with keyword hit counts. Since that notification, I have not received the responsive records, a determination letter, or a written update explaining the current processing stage of the request.
Blair and (“visit” or “trip” or “schedule” or “itinerary” or “agenda”) — 28 hits / 155 pages
Blair and (“program” or “meeting” or “bilat” or “bilateral”) — 50 hits / 250 pages
Prime Minister — 383 hits / 1,915 pages
“No. 10” or “Downing Street” — 1 hit / 5 pages
“UK” and (“visit” or “itinerary”) — 141 hits / 705 pages
“social provision” and Blair — 1 hit / 5 pages
Australia and Blair — 0 hits
New York and Blair — 5 hits / 25 pages
Dunkley and Blair — 1 hit / 5 pages
Nearly a year has now passed since I was informed that responsive records had been identified. Despite this, no responsive material has been released, no determination has been issued, and no explanation has been provided for the continued delay.
It is my opinion that this prolonged failure to release identified records is being used to conceal serious wrongdoing. I believe the Clinton Library, acting under the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), is deliberately withholding records that should have been disclosed.
All Dana Simmons of the Clinton Library in forms is that they are processing nothing, more.
Despite asking for information which has been piggy backed on to other cases nothing has been provided piggybacking” FOIA 2026-0609-F onto FOIA 2025-1058-F, the Clinton Library / NARA has disclosed any of my personal data, identity, correspondence, email address, request wording, or request details to the requester or to any third party connected with FOIA 2025-1058-F.
If anyone in America can go to this office and obtain these documents, it would be extremely helpful.
thestealingofemily.co.uk 
Leave a comment