Subject :Nothing to Fear from Mandelson

Dear Mr. Wes Streeting, (by email)

I note your comments regarding Lord Mandelson reported in the Daily Mail on 7th February 2026.

I have been writing to you via Facebook for nearly a year and have not received a response, which I find disappointing. As an elected representative, I would have expected some acknowledgement or engagement with the concerns raised by members of the public. My correspondence relates to serious matters involving child safeguarding and reported abduction figures. I previously wrote to you on 6th February 2025 and received a response indicating my correspondence had been logged under an Unreasonable and Persistent Complainants Policy classification. Given the seriousness of the subject matter, I believe this warrants proper review rather than administrative dismissal.  

I would appreciate a reply clarifying your position and addressing why previous messages have gone unanswered.

I consider you in close company with Epstien and Mandelson as otherwise you would have answered.

 For context, I have referenced publicly available legal material concerning the Epstein investigations, including documentation from the New Mexico Attorney General’s Office and related reporting, to illustrate why safeguarding concerns must be treated with the utmost seriousness. Sources include U.S. Department of Justice records and major news coverage.  In respect to your email  the matter already relates to child abduction which has risen in 2025 from 430,000 to 758,000 because your council was made aware of this and did nothing! but sit on their hands.!

 The form of this children abduction has been made clear to you the In line with our letter to you date 6th February 2025 and the decision made in respect of the public’s Unreasonable and Unreasonably Persistent Complainants Policy, your email has been read, logged and placed on file as it pertains to Speckled Wood matters. and abduction of children . I have already informed you publicly that It appears in a letter from the Office of the New Mexico Attorney General to the U.S. Attorney’s Office as part of efforts to secure forfeiture of Epstein’s property and assist federal prosecutors.  It is a July 8, 2020 letter from the New Mexico Attorney General’s Office to the Acting United States Attorney in New York. The letter was part of investigative and asset-forfeiture efforts, and it argued that the Zorro Ranch in New Mexico was used to support Epstein’s trafficking activities and to help conceal those crimes. The exact wording you quoted — “used by Epstein and others to facilitate the commission and prolonged concealment of his trafficking of children”

 cite https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00015190.pdf

There is documented evidence and ongoing investigation showing Jeffrey Epstein’s trafficking network had an international dimension, including victims connected to the United Kingdom, and not just the U.S. Here’s what is actually supported by credible sources versus unverified claims:   

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghislaine_Maxwell

https://archive.ph/2025.12.15-222817/https%3A/www.bbc.com/news/articles/cy4709kylkxo

Warm regards,

Martin Newbold

• Nothing to Fear from Mandelson
• Communication with Sir Mark Rowley the MET
• Request for Information on Epstein-Linked Victims
• Understanding the Complexity of Peerage Revocation and NCA
• Corruption Investigations: IBAC’s Limitations Explained