In 2025 the UK Government admitted something shocking:
430,000 young people never received their Child Trust Funds.

Every child born between 2002 and 2011 was given one of these accounts. The government promised it would be there when they turned 18. Yet almost half a million accounts were left unclaimed.


What we know

  • Fact: 430,000 accounts exist, with real money inside.
  • Fact: These children were known to the state since birth.
  • Fact: By law, local authorities were supposed to act as “corporate parents” for children in care and make sure they received their funds.

What doesn’t add up

  • England has about 6,000 children’s homes, with space for maybe 25,000 children.
  • Even if every place in every home was filled, it only explains a fraction of the missing accounts.
  • Foster care and kinship placements add some more, but not nearly enough.
  • That still leaves hundreds of thousands of young people unaccounted for.

The question nobody answers

If these children weren’t in care homes, and didn’t receive their funds at 18…

Where are they?

  • CommentJust NowTo: oversight.republicans@mail.house.gov; oversight.democrats@mail.house.gov Subject: Oversight Request – Blair–Clinton (Apr 10–12, 1996) Records, Related UK Fellowship Activity, and 430,000 Missing Children Dear Committee Staff, I am requesting the Committee’s assistance to secure and review U.S. federal records relating to Prime Minister Tony Blair’s visit to Washington, D.C., April 10–12, 1996, and any connected education/child-welfare policy discussions with President Clinton. I also ask the Committee to examine contemporaneous UK–US policy linkages involving a UK education officer, Matthew Dunkley, who was in California under a Harkness Fellowship (with Theresa Makey) at the University of California, Berkeley in May 1996. Why this matters UK public bodies have provided inconsistent accounts of Mr. Dunkley’s employment timeline (claiming 21 years in East Sussex that appear to be 18), while records place him in California around the time of Blair–Clinton policy meetings. If U.S. records (White House/NARA/State) reflect UK–US coordination on education/child welfare while this officer was on U.S. placement, that directly contradicts the UK “official record” and indicates potential misrepresentation and suppression of material facts. These discrepancies arise in the wider context of 430,000 missing children, a crisis that underscores the need for transparency and accountability. Personal Note We are aware that others with greater institutional power than myself have already requested documents from the Clinton Presidential Library on this subject. Only a fool would fail to see the central record — the elephant in the room — that ties these timelines together. I was not invited to testify or participate as a victim in Epstein-related proceedings. I remain willing to provide evidence and am available to appear before the Committee by Zoom or other secure means.House Oversight Committee to meet privately with Epstein victims
  • Comment10h The numbers don’t add up (18 years vs. 21 years in East Sussex). The locations don’t add up (Berkeley vs. East Sussex at the same time). The connections don’t add up (Blair/Clinton policy meetings vs. Dunkley’s supposed role). When you stack it together, it doesn’t look like sloppy record-keeping — it looks like deliberate misrepresentation. That’s why you’re right to call him a liar. The record has been bent to fit a narrative that keeps his trans-Atlantic movements hidden. @thestealingofemilyHouse Oversight Committee to meet privately with Epstein victims
  • Reply to a comment10h Well then, they won’t catch the real culprits; it will just be another cover-up. If they were the ones in front of me at the Clinton Museum, then they must have what I have — only a fool would fail to see the monkey in the room. Why were Dunkley and his wife, Makey, at Berkeley University with no record of him lecturing in England, when he was allegedly employed in East Sussex according to the Berkeley meeting? The Clinton record is a clear indication that he met with Clinton and Blair.House Oversight Committee to meet privately with Epstein victims

Leave a comment

ACT NOW:

Help us turn this into a Drama:
https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/stealing-of-emily

Sign up your criminal cases:
The Stealing of Emily – Review of cases for illegal Separation. | Crowdsignal.com (survey.fm)

Rosie, a survivor who was so brave in 2016 Who has been through this horrifying scandal.

HOW TO REPORT TRAFFICKING TO THE UNITED NATIONS

Updates

Gods children are not for sale

Class action needed 500 plus cases to bring Truth justice and accountability for our children in the corrupt care system. Anyone who remembers the England Post Office Horizon scandal will know we need 500+ names to get A class, collective or group action is a claim in which the court awards permission to an individual or individuals to bring similarly placed claims in a single case. Collective actions are an efficient way of dealing where there are a huge number of claimants suing a large corporation or social services under a similar set of facts.

  • This is why we all stood strong and fought for all our children.
  • Now the only consideration must be to They came for our Children and they are FINISHED.
  • We do not want a Generation without Mothers and Fathers.