- AI tools are beginning to assist in legal tasks like research, document review, and legal drafting—but not replace judges. These tools help save time and improve accuracy.
AP NewsJudicature+2The Times+2 - Judges are gradually exploring AI to support—but not supplant—judicial functions. Some have even written opinions discussing its potential.
Connect On Tech - Courts are also experimenting with AI in more dramatic ways. For example, AI-generated victim statements have been used in sentencing and raised serious ethical concerns regarding manipulation and authenticity.
AP News - There’s growing skepticism too:
- One study found judges highly distrust risk-assessment algorithms, calling them “worthless” or “not helpful.”
Business Insider+3The Times+3Judicature+3 - A group of judges declared that while AI might streamline administrative tasks, it should never replace core human judgment in legal decisions.
The Times
- One study found judges highly distrust risk-assessment algorithms, calling them “worthless” or “not helpful.”
- Public sentiment is similarly cautious:
- Judges who rely on expertise are generally viewed as more legitimate and fair compared to those using AI, especially among White and Hispanic communities. Interestingly, some Black respondents saw AI-assisted decisions as potentially more neutral due to historical bias in the system.
info.breakingmedia.com+14PMC+14Judicature+14
- Judges who rely on expertise are generally viewed as more legitimate and fair compared to those using AI, especially among White and Hispanic communities. Interestingly, some Black respondents saw AI-assisted decisions as potentially more neutral due to historical bias in the system.
- Legal bodies are already creating guidance:
- The ABA has issued ethics guidance on AI use by lawyers.
napco4courtleaders.org+1American Bar Association - Australian courts require lawyers to disclose AI usage to avoid misleading courts.
The Australian
- The ABA has issued ethics guidance on AI use by lawyers.
- A Thomson Reuters survey showed a majority of legal professionals have adopted AI in the past year, with nearly 90% wanting AI tailored to their profession. A webinar is being held on how AI tools are being used in courts ethically.
info.breakingmedia.com
- Comment Just Now So what about the others at the meetings in Wahington with Clinton , Blair , Dunkley why do you think you will get honest answer from any of these three the real breadcrumbs from “Education, Education, Education” what about the others at the meetings in Washington with Clinton, Blair, and Dunkley? Why do you think you will get an honest answer from any of these three? The real breadcrumbs from “Education, Education, Education” — Blair’s speech — point to a trilogy of men, or perhaps a “divine trinity” in his mind. No official detail has ever been given on who else was in the room.? When are the others receiving Subpoena?High-Profile Depositions Scheduled on Epstein Case
- Comment2m They Haven’t Even Touched the Tip of the Iceberg Authorities have yet to confront the full scale of Epstein’s crimes. In the UK alone, there are 430,000 missing children — including my daughter, Emily — referenced in government and NSPCC documents. This evidence places Bill Clinton as a prime suspect. He met with Tony Blair and potentially Matthew Dunkley in 1996, yet refuses to release his April itinerary. When you connect these facts to disturbing reports from UK care homes and to the operations of Chaturbate — a billion-dollar live-stream sex platform with origins shrouded in secrecy — the reality becomes sickening. Evidence suggests Timothy W. Newcome, an IT architect linked to Epstein’s digital empire, may have played a role in the platform’s technical foundations. His disappearance from public records before 2013, the lack of corporate transparency, and potential FBI ties all point to deliberate obfuscation. Taken together, the picture is one of a systemic, industrial-scale exploitation network — exploiting vulnerable children through both physical trafficking and digital monetisation — operating under the noses of governments and tech companies, shielded by political connections and silence.New Jeffrey Epstein survivors to come forward
- Comment17h Clintons Could Face Threat of Contempt Over Subpoena If Bill Clinton never visited Epstein’s island, why does his name appear in the flight records? He also met with Tony Blair and possibly Matthew Dunkley, yet his Presidential Library refuses to release his April 1996 itinerary. What exactly is he hiding? I warned before that this man would never be truthful — he was close to Ghislaine Maxwell and has inherited her secrecy.1 ReplyClintons Could Face Threat of Contempt Over Subpoena
“Personally, my paid for Chat AI can’t count past six images to put ten of them in a line. If this AI can’t count past six, how can it inform a judge who is supposed to be trained in all factors of the law?”
thestealingofemily.co.uk 
Leave a comment