DOJ Submission Letter – Revised

To:
U.S. Department of Justice
Office of the Attorney General
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20530-0001
 CC:

• Liberty Human Rights.
• International Criminal Court (ICC)
• United Nations OHCHR
• U.S. State Department – Human Rights
• National Center for Missing & Exploited Children (NCMEC)
• Public Correspondence cabinetoffice.gov.uk  
• Secretary of State for Justice (Rt Hon. Alex Chalk KC MP)  

Subject: Redactions in Flight Manifests Released Under Court Filing — Gov’t Exhibit 662-RR, S2 20 CR. 330 (AJN)

---

Dear Sir or Madam,

I am writing regarding documents released in the matter of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, under court docket number S2 20 CR. 330 (AJN), specifically Government Exhibit 662-RR.

This exhibit contains what is clearly a pilot’s flight manifest for a private aircraft, likely a Learjet, Gulfstream, or similar jet, consistent with Epstein’s known fleet. The manifest details dozens of short-haul flights between airports such as:

• PBI (Palm Beach International Airport)
• TEB (Teterboro Airport, NJ)
• STT / SXM (St. Thomas / Saint Martin)
• *Caribbean destinations associated with Epstein’s properties

Upon close review, we observe the following:

---

 Key Observations:

• The manifest contains repeated redactions of initials and names, particularly in the “Passenger” sections.
• Passengers are overwhelmingly female, with no apparent adult male guardians or business associations listed.
• Redacted entries appear disproportionately on high-profile routes, notably PBI → TEB, which correlate with public records linking Donald J. Trump, Bill Clinton, and others to the Epstein network.
• The format used — initials only, or first names — deviates from standard FAA or TSA manifests and appears crafted to limit traceability.

---

 Conclusion:

These logs — released as part of Gov’t Exhibit 662-RR — fail to provide full transparency. Despite being entered into evidence under a federal criminal case, they remain heavily censored, obstructing public scrutiny.

The redaction of initials, not just full names, and the disproportionate listing of young women/girls on private jet routes to Epstein properties raises serious concerns of obstruction, trafficking, and reputational shielding.

---

 I am formally requesting:

1. A full explanation as to why redactions of initials and manifest entries were allowed in this official government exhibit.
2. The release of an unredacted version of Exhibit 662-RR, in accordance with transparency obligations in criminal proceedings.
3. A review of the redaction process to determine whether any government or judicial officers allowed selective concealment of politically sensitive individuals.

---

I am prepared to submit:

• Extracted OCR transcripts,
• Visual evidence of redacted initials,
• Image files from the manifest showing irregularities (e.g.,  Gov’t Exhibit 662-RR, S2 20 CR. 330 (AJN)  .026.png),
• Comparisons to known FAA passenger manifest formats.

 epstein-flight-logs-released-in-usa-vs-maxwell.pdf

Cite 📎 Download the DOJ version here Government Brad Edwards Civil Lawsuit Logs Exhibit 662 -RR S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)

Yours faithfully,
Martin Newbold
 http://www.martinnewbold.co.uk

• Understanding the Complexity of Peerage Revocation and NCA
• Corruption Investigations: IBAC’s Limitations Explained
• Child Trafficking Concerns and the EHCR
• Guide Series How to Report Child Abduction a complete Procedure
• Reinvestigating Child Exploitation Cases: Operation BeaconPort