In recent days, we’ve been taking a closer look at the so-called “unredacted Epstein flight logs” — widely circulated online and touted as comprehensive. But let’s be clear: they’re not.

After forensic analysis of the PDF titled “EPSTEIN FLIGHT LOGS UNREDACTED.pdf”, we’ve uncovered the following:

🔍 File Forensics Reveal:

• The document was generated on a Mac (macOS 11.1) using Apple Numbers.
• It was not exported, but “printed to PDF”, which removes author metadata and editing traces — a trick often used to cover digital footprints.
• The PDF format is 1.3, an older standard, suggesting intent to strip modern tracking layers.

There are no embedded redactions, but entire sections of flight records — particularly involving the UK — are simply missing.

---

🇬🇧 What’s Missing?

We cross-checked this version against the official flight logs released in the U.S. v. Maxwell case (hosted on DocumentCloud). The differences are stark:

Flight Log Source	UK Flights (e.g. Luton, Heathrow)	UK References
Your PDF – “Unredacted”	❌ No	❌ None
DOJ / Maxwell Trial Logs (DocumentCloud)	✅ Yes	✅ Present

The UK traffic has been cleanly removed — not blanked out or redacted, but simply deleted before export. Gone are flights to and from Luton (EGGW), Heathrow (EGLL), or RAF Northolt. Gone too are names tied to these flights, including Prince Andrew.

---

🧠 Conclusion: A Sanitised Document

Whoever created this version clearly knew what they were doing:

• Data trimmed at the CSV level, not redacted at the PDF layer.
• UK references wiped, and
• A new clean-looking version exported to give the illusion of transparency.

This isn’t a case of missing files. It’s a deliberate act of omission.

What were they trying to hide?

“Where is Emily“

From 2003 onward, there are no recorded departures or arrivals involving London, the UK, or any UK territory listed in this log.

📎 Download the DOJ version here Government Brad Edwards Civil Lawsuit Logs Exhibit 662 -RR S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)

🔍 Key Points from Extracted Data:

📅 May 3, 1996

• Flights 4417–4420
  • Route: Dublin → Waterford
  • Oddity: Waterford is listed as being in the United Kingdom, which is incorrect. Waterford is in the Republic of Ireland, not part of the UK.
  • Implication: This could suggest false jurisdictional labelling, possibly to bypass customs, immigration, or legal oversight.
• Flights 4421–4422
  • Route: Waterford (labelled UK) → Paris
  • Implication: The mislabeling may have allowed international transfers to France to appear as UK–EU flights, potentially bypassing Dublin oversight entirely.

📅 May 5, 1997

• Flight 4822
  • Route: London → Geneva
  • Note: Geneva has been a hotspot for offshore accounts, diplomatic immunity, and opaque international dealings. The timing and route could suggest connections to finance or political networks.

---

Further insight
🇬🇧 UK Flights Identified

📅 May 3, 1996

• 4417–4420: Dublin → Waterford (mislabeled as “Ireland, United Kingdom”)
• 4421–4422:Waterford → Paris
  • Note: Waterford is in Republic of Ireland, not the UK, but is labelled here as UK.

📅 May 5, 1997

• 4822: London → Geneva

📅 June 8, 1999

• 5524:London → Teterboro, New Jersey (USA)
  • ✈️ This is a direct transatlantic flight from the UK to the US. Likely private jet.

📅 June 9, 1999

• 5525:Teterboro → London
  • 🧭 Return flight from the US to the UK. Very rare in logs.

📅 June 15, 1999

• 5531: Teterboro → London

📅 June 16, 1999

• 5532:London → Teterboro
  • ❗Four UK-linked flights in just over a week. Highly unusual frequency.

📅 April 3, 2001

• 6216: Teterboro → London

📅 April 4, 2001

• 6217: London → Teterboro

📅 April 25, 2002

• 6428: Teterboro → London

📅 April 26, 2002

6429: London → Teterboro

🚨 Why This Is Important:

• The misclassification of Waterford as part of the UK is not a clerical error — it may have been deliberate to manipulate jurisdiction.
• These regional hops (e.g., Dublin → Waterford → Paris) are classic methods of laundering passenger logs or disguising origins.
• May 1996 and May 1997 are within the key operational period of Epstein’s network, especially in Europe.
• These records could connect Ireland, the UK, and France under one flight circuit, opening up scrutiny for who was onboard and who authorised or recorded these flights.

• Letter To Cabinet Office
• Urgent Appeal to the King for Christmas Help in Finding Missing Child
• FORMAL EVIDENCE SUBMISSION: Verification of “abx17@dial.pipex.com” (The Invisible Man) via EFTA Records and TalkTalk Business Metadata 
• The case of Mr. Martin Newbold v Nationwide Building Society (Case Number: 1741 7947 6145 5930).
• Investigating Local Authority Failures in Child Care