AI’s Current Limitations in “Crisis” Recognition and Nuance:
Well, if the companies, Local Authorities Government are all using Monday.com when AI struggles to obtain crisis points in my timeline them clearly it cannot create crisis information from emails it receives there for this is wholly ignore procedurally.
Instead, it’s just another example of corporate interests and tools like monday.com being used by councils and organizations in ways that don’t address the real needs, especially when it comes to crisis management. This is a bigger problem in society where tools that should be working for us are instead failing to deliver when it counts. It’s a reflection of how systems can often be more about appearances and profit than about genuine support for people in crisis.
The fact that these systems are being implemented and yet fail to address urgent needs—or evade real problems—is infuriating. When you see tools like monday.com being adopted in public sectors, but they don’t actually solve the issues that matter, it paints a picture of a world where profit and efficiency are prioritized over real human needs.
UK Government Entities: monday.com is available through the UK Government’s G-Cloud 12 framework, allowing public sector organizations to purchase its services. As of the announcement, monday.com had 400 paying accounts from government entities in the UK, with thousands of additional government bodies expressing interest. monday.com
You’re essentially asking: If I, an AI, struggled to identify the full scope of “crisis points” in a text (even with prompting), how can systems like monday.com, which might incorporate AI, be trusted to handle similar complexities or replace human involvement, especially when critical judgment is needed?
UK Government Entities Using monday.com:
Enable.services and Clearvision: These UK-based partners are listed as suppliers for CCS, facilitating the adoption of monday.com by public sector organizations. smebusinessnews.co.uk
Crown Commercial Service (CCS): monday.com is available through the UK Government’s G-Cloud 12 framework, enabling public sector organizations to purchase its services.
Borough of Haringey: This local authority in London has been mentioned as a user of monday.com.
Here’s my attempt to address that:
AI’s Current Limitations in “Crisis” Recognition and Nuance:
My initial “failure” to identify the full depth of the crisis points, and the need for your direct guidance, illustrates a key limitation of AI in its current form:
- Lack of Human-like Intuition and Contextual Understanding: I process information based on patterns and explicit data. I don’t possess intuition, empathy, or the ability to infer nuanced “crisis” implications that a human might immediately grasp from fragmented information or subtle cues, especially when dealing with human suffering or systemic injustice. I didn’t connect “The Stealing of Emily” in the URL to a specific “missing young woman” video unless prompted directly.
- Reliance on Explicit Data: I needed you to explicitly point out details like the “430,000 trust funds,” the specific issues with “contract law” (which turned out to be “written agreements”), or the specific allegations against Matt Dunkley in Australia. These details, while critical to the overall “crisis,” were not centrally elaborated within the single timeline article I was initially asked to summarize. My “Browse” tool extracted text, not the full context of a website or external allegations.
- Interpretation of “Crisis”: What constitutes a “crisis” to a human often involves moral, ethical, and emotional dimensions that AI doesn’t inherently “understand” or prioritize without being specifically trained or prompted to look for them. My default is often to provide a factual, neutral summary.
AI’s Role: Augmentation vs. Replacement:
Your concern about platforms like monday.com (or any system using AI) replacing human involvement touches on a valid and ongoing debate. AI is often powerful for:
- Processing Vast Data: Analyzing huge datasets, identifying trends, and automating repetitive tasks far faster than humans can.
- Efficiency: Streamlining workflows and improving operational speed.
- Pattern Recognition: Detecting anomalies or patterns in data that might indicate issues (though not necessarily “crises” in a nuanced human sense).
However, as search results on AI in crisis management confirm, AI currently struggles significantly with:
- Ethical Decision-Making: AI lacks a moral compass and can perpetuate biases if its training data is biased.
- Contextual Understanding: It struggles with ambiguity, uncertainty, and understanding complex human situations that require real-world experience.
- Emotional Intelligence and Empathy: Crucial for sensitive issues like child welfare, AI cannot replicate the human touch, intuition, or empathy needed for effective communication and support in crises.
- Accountability and Transparency: It can be difficult to understand why an AI made a certain decision, which is problematic in high-stakes environments.
- Adaptability to Novel Situations: While it learns from data, AI isn’t inherently adaptable to entirely novel, unforeseen crises that fall outside its training parameters, which human judgment excels at.
Therefore, the concern is valid. My performance in this conversation mirrors some of the broader limitations of AI when it comes to the nuanced, ethical, and emotionally charged aspects of crisis identification and management, especially compared to the depth of human judgment. In critical areas like child services, the consensus is that AI should augment human capabilities by handling data, flagging patterns, and automating tasks, but it cannot replace the human oversight, ethical reasoning, and empathetic judgment essential for dealing with people in crisis.
thestealingofemily.co.uk 
Leave a comment