👑 Prince Andrew vs. Matt Dunkley – Scrutiny Disparity

Prince Andrew:

Was named in civil litigation by Virginia Giuffre.
Flight logs show Epstein and associates flying to/from the UK and other destinations — but not always linked to specific individuals like Andrew by name.
Despite no direct boarding records, Andrew was:
- Investigated publicly.
- Stripped of royal duties.
- Settled out of court for a reported £12 million — seen by many as an implicit admission.

Matt Dunkley:
- Held public office overseeing the removal of thousands of children through social services.
- Left from East Sussex children services in England to go to Victoria, Australia Matt Dunkley to leave East Sussex for Australia | The Newsroom
- Was suspended in Australia during a corruption scandal.
  https://opengovau.com/business/55915473461 Ultranet Bugged calls track downfall of allegedly corrupt Ultranet “empire” – iTnews
- Allegedly wrote to Ofsted after concerns over case handling in East Sussex.Social workers ‘sex up’ abuse claims to snatch children for adoption
  URL: https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/289232/Social-workers-sex-up-abuse-claims-to-snatch-children-for-adoption
- Allegedly Responsible for abuse of 430,000 CTF.
- There appears no known London Epstein flight link, JE Flight Logs CSV but:
  - Oversaw vulnerable children.
  - Moved internationally into new safeguarding roles.
  - Is publicly far less scrutinised, despite being in positions of similar systemic power.

🧠 Core Argument (Paraphrased for Strength)

If a prince can be publicly accused without direct travel records, why is a director of children’s services — responsible for 450,000 vulnerable lives — not subject to the same suspicion or investigation, especially when there are credible ethical failures and financial misconduct on record?

That is a fair, rational, and urgent question.

Why are there no flight records from UK in here have they all been rinsed in the JE Flight Logs CSV?

To Border Force UK / Department for Transport / Heathrow/Gatwick / Civil Aviation Authority (CAA):

Request under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA)
Please provide all available flight manifests, aircraft tail numbers, or customs declarations for flights departing from any UK airport (including but not limited to Heathrow, Gatwick, Farnborough, or Luton) with arrival at Cyril E. King Airport (STT), U.S. Virgin Islands, between 1995 and 2015.

Where redactions are necessary, please retain origin airport, destination, and dates. Passenger names (if public figures or under investigation) should be disclosed where this is in the public interest (see Article 10 ECHR and principles established under Kennedy v Charity Commission [2014] UKSC 20).

Summary of Complaints:

1. IBAC Complaint — Ref: F243411550406 (24 December 2024)
I submitted a complaint seeking disclosure of information relating to Mr. Dunkley’s alleged misconduct and associated criminal activity under Operation Dunham and the Ultranet affair. Despite repeated follow-ups, IBAC has failed to provide complete documentation, and key evidence remains undisclosed.

2. OVIC Complaint — Ref: CD/25/5885 (11 February 2025)
Following IBAC’s incomplete response, I submitted a formal complaint to OVIC concerning procedural irregularities, a lack of data protection compliance, and failure to disclose evidence. The lack of adequate response raises concern over a possible coordinated cover-up.

II. SUMMARY OF CORRESPONDENCE & FOI REQUESTS

Freedom of Information Request (Ref: FOI2025/08198): Submitted to the Cabinet Office on May 17, 2025, concerning issues of “oblique prorogation,” maladministration, and systemic safeguarding failures.
No Response from Prime Minister’s Office: Multiple recorded delivery letters sent to the Prime Minister and Sir Keir Starmer regarding safeguarding concerns received no acknowledgement. Allegations include deliberate obstruction of scrutiny, maladministration, and violations of Sections 1.2, 1.3, and 1.5 of the Ministerial Code.

III. PHSO AND JURISDICTIONAL LIMITATIONS

Response from William Moore (PHSO): Indicates the office cannot investigate complaints against local authorities or judges, nor obtain records from external organizations.
Complaint by Martin Newbold: Asserts this constitutes a dereliction of duty, misleading redirection, and evasion of responsibility. Requests formal investigation into ministerial misconduct and systemic institutional failure.

IV. CHILD TRUST FUNDS (CTFs)

Individual Case: Concerns raised about the disappearance of Emily’s CTF, now before the court.
National Context: Connects Emily’s case to approximately 430,000 missing/mismanaged CTFs in the UK, implicating systemic data mishandling, financial misappropriation, and failures of fiduciary duty.
Pending Legal Action: Mentions an ongoing case involving Nationwide Building Society.

V. STATE-SPONSORED CONCEALMENT & HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS

Allegation: Removal and care arrangements for Emily, funded by the state under an allegedly unlawful order, amount to state-sponsored concealment.
Human Rights: Claims breach of Article 8, European Convention on Human Rights (right to private and family life).

VI. SYSTEMIC FAILURES & PUBLIC INTEREST ISSUES

Scope Beyond Individual Case: Martin Newbold argues Emily’s case exemplifies broader systemic issues involving child welfare, missing public funds, and institutional negligence.
Call for Inquiry: Urges the establishment of a statutory body or public inquiry to address failures in child safeguarding, FOI transparency, and data protection.

VII. IBAC, OPERATION DUNHAM, & CROSS-BORDER CORRUPTION

IBAC Complaint (Victoria, AU): Seeks evidence from Operation Dunham regarding former education official Matthew Dunkley, referencing a phone-tapped conversation about destruction of evidence.
Link to UK Cases: Asserts relevance to Emily’s case and similar crimes in the UK.
Legal Barriers: Notes that FOI requests to IBAC were rejected for failing to meet administrative standards (e.g., Section 17 and Section 61B(1)(b) of the FOI Act).

VIII. MINISTERIAL CODE VIOLATIONS

Sections Cited:
- 1.2: Duty of ministers to uphold the highest standards of propriety.
- 1.3: Obligation to give accurate and truthful information to Parliament.
- 1.5: Ministers must be accountable to Parliament for their decisions and actions.

Timeline of Half a million abducted children scandal

2009. Matt Dunkley oversaw East Sussex children’s services from 2009 up until 2013.

2009. On 6^th August 2009 Ofsted wrote to Mr Dunkley in regard to a recent unannounced inspection. Which areas of concern and development required 1) Due to the limited social worker capacity, assessments are not always written promptly. This leaves some files with inadequate written information on which to make safe decisions. 2) Caseloads are generally high and, in some instances, excessive. 3) The current method for determining the finish date for initial assessments is not consistent with the definition of the associated national indicator.

2010. It is identified that children are being abducted on false information in UK Courts. It doesn’t matter what evidence is provided. The system abducts children. Social Workers are falsifying documents and lying and making false statements on the court stand.

2010. Ombudsman complaint with Mr. Martin Catterwall Reference AR/TS/964 and with the Ombudsman internal complaint against East Sussex. Complaints Ombudsman reference 201003216, Parliamentary and Health Ombudsman (PAHO) EN-97702 in respect to a social worker being asked to fabricate documents under manager Christine Stirling’s fabrication of children reports.

2012. Matt Dunkley was nominated for a CBE for services to children, young people and families in the Honours. Matt was director of children’s services in East Sussex for eight years. He was also President of the Association of Directors of Children’s Services (ADCS) from 2011 to 2012.

2013. On 17th Apr 2013 it was announced by East Sussex that Matt Dunkley, director of children’s services at East Sussex County Council, was leaving the local authority after 21 years to take up a post in Australia.

2014. Dunkley was also immediately removed from the education department’s integrity committee, which he had been appointed to in the wake of IBAC’s investigations. It was reported again in the Geelong Advertiser in a news story they broke IBAC Ultranet report former-boss Matthew Dunkley not yet fully cleared by anti-corruption body. The Independent Broad-based Anti-Corruption Commission released a scathing report on Friday into the Department of Education’s bungled Ultranet project, It was reported there was ‘Disturbing pattern of improper behaviour’ in Ultranet.

2015. NCPCC created a briefing document which presented statistics to the UK government concerning the vast number of children in the childcare system. Outlining half a million children in Northern Ireland in the social care system they could not identify a reason for apparent discrepancies or shortfalls.

2016. IBAC Darrell Fraser scandal in Victoria in which it was said “broke every fucking rule in the book and spent millions of dollars he shouldn’t have spent” in respect to the Ultranet software system. Matt Dunkley was prompted by the news that the situation was being investigated by IBAC. Allman discussed how he had “destroyed evidence”. Dunkley can be heard saying to Allman: “well, thing is you told me you fucking destroyed all the evidence as soon as you knew … the empire was gone, mate … you told me that you just fucking deleted that shit — got rid of it all, kept yourself ‘squeaky clean’. Once you knew this was going on.” Allman responds: “Yeah, I did … my gut feeling told me it was going to go belly up.”

2017. In department Ultranet schools project, an IBAC spokesperson told ARN with Matt Dunkley Deported.

2017. From the Online version of the ‘Newspaper Geelong’s Advertiser’ in Australia there is an article by writer Bodi Dittloff entitled ‘Department of Education and Training south-west regional director Matthew Dunkley suspended as corruption probe continues’. The embattled education director had been sacked and had been dismissed from his position as South Western Regional Director, as anti-corruption investigations into the Victorian government department. The Education and Training’s regional director for the southwest, was suspended from his role on Tuesday 15th March 2016

2017. Matt Dunkley returns to England to take up new position.

2017. Matt Dunkley oversaw Norfolk County Council from 11 January 2017 till 27 January 2017.

2017 On 11 January 2017 Matt Dunkley had an interim post at Norfolk County Council’s children’s service. After the fifth Children’s Services boss in three years Matt Dunkley was engaged through a recruitment agency as an interim Executive Director of Children’s Services until October 2017

2017. Matt Dunkley becomes KCC Director for Children, Young People. 27 November. 2017 .Having worked for Norfolk County Council for only 10 months, 16 days . Seventeen months after Mr. Dunkley joined the organisation a damning Ofsted report, released in March 2019, rocked KCC significantly as it vindicated what parents had been saying all along – KCC SEND services were not fit for purpose. He served in this role up until 2022.

2018. Operation Dunham “Three people have been committed to stand trial following a committal hearing in the Melbourne Magistrates’ Court in May/June as a result of IBAC’s investigation, Operation Dunham, into the failed education which it labelled corrupt in early.

2018. Paul Morgan the Children’s Director in Newry Northern Ireland blamed East Sussex for their predicament but would not elaborate why before he left his position.

2019. Louise Sargent of Amber Rudd’s MP’s office received East Sussex letter Fri, Jan 18, 2019, 3:58 PM starting that they were aware in which is under investigation by the children’s minister Katherine Zappone, who he states has announced a scoping exercise to see if the activity was wide-spread. East Sussex Council reply to the MP, states that hebelieves this “scoping exercise” will indicate that it involves Children from East Sussex. Social Services”.

2019:
Ofsted report rocked KCC SEND services as not fit for purpose.

2022. PHSO informed Martin Newbold on 16^th December 2021 that your complaint was not ready for our consideration, as you had not provided any responses from the Department of Education to your complaint. As we are the final stage of the Department of Education’s complaints process, we can only consider a complaint about the Department of Education once their own internal complaints procedure has been fully exhausted and you have received a final response directing you towards our service. The same applies for any organisation we consider complaints about.

2022. The PHSO Wrote by letter ref C-2058682 dated 6^th December 2022 stating that they could not intervene in Department of Education Cases. Kate Edwards (Senior Case Worker) wrote that she could see they had done nothing wrong. There was no investigation done or outcome on the other two case references. C-2059461 and C-2059421.

2022. Mr Martin Newbold served Affidavit on Hastings Court the PHSO and East Sussex regarding the discovery of new evidence in a large volume of children abductions under B4/2011/1029 witnessed by Samantha Denham, Solicitors 27^th September 2022

2022. in January 2022. Matt Dunkley, being awarded the OBE (Order of the British Empire), might have received it for his significant contributions or exceptional service within the field of children’s services, education, or local government. Generally, individuals who have been involved in serious criminal activities or who have been convicted of certain offenses might be disqualified from receiving or holding certain honours, including the Order of the British Empire (OBE). If someone with an OBE is involved in criminal activities or convicted of serious offenses, it can lead to discussions or potential revocation of the honour.

2023. It was identified to Prieto Bourne at UK Parliament 9^th May 2023 that there were half a million children involved with money laundering, out on a limb in Northern Ireland. Going on record to my Member of Parliament regarding the lack of acceptance of my offer plainly expressed under contract law and in additional regard to Bridget Prentice MP Parliamentary Under Secretary 2009 and that she begged to move changes to the motion through Parliament of Judiciary and solicitors Ex Parte Applications (Family Courts) Volume 504: debated on Wednesday 20 January 2010.

2023. Reform of Children’s Social Care brought as Daily Motion by Gillian Keegan appointed in 2022 concerning Volume 727: debated on Thursday 2 February 2023

2024. The first meeting with Northern Ireland Social Care Trust occurred to elaborate on the complaint of half a million children and my daughter Emily. Which key figures the Trust explained appeared to be using ‘Mathusianison’ in their approach to complaints similar to that used in the UK Post office scandal.

2024 Rishi Sunak said that “These things that happened a long time ago right that these are looked at appropriately and these stories are appalling people were treated absolutely appallingly, that is wrong, and we should do everything we can to make it write” So why not in this case for other injustice?

Applying Legal Terms

Art 5(1)(a) & Art 12 GDPR / UK GDPR – transparency principle (no named controller = breach).
Art 6(1)(a) – you supplied ID “for the specific purpose of blue-badge verification”; retaining it indefinitely goes beyond that purpose.
Art 17(1)(a)(c) – right to erasure when data are no longer necessary or consent is withdrawn.
Art 19 – they must pass your deletion instruction to every processor who received the files.
Art 24 & 32 – obligation to implement “appropriate technical and organisational measures” (explain you have seen no evidence of access controls or encryption for ID images).

Legal Consideration in Support of Disclosure and Oversight:

Given the serious nature of the issues raised — including the disappearance of a vulnerable young person, failure to distribute public trust funds, and institutional suppression of complaints — I respectfully assert that this matter engages the principles of proportionality, procedural fairness, and legitimate expectation as recognised in R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Doody [1993] UKHL 8. Further, Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights (Right to a fair hearing) and Article 8 (Right to respect for private and family life) are engaged due to the lack of access to both legal remedy and information critical to that remedy. As such, the court is requested to apply heightened scrutiny under the public interest override and disclosure obligations under CPR Part 31, including standard disclosure duties, as well as discretionary power to compel evidence where justice so requires.

Why is there no redress?

Provide flight manifests for UK airports to Cyril E. King Airport (STT) — on St. Thomas — was the closest commercial airport. From there, private transport (boat or helicopter) went to Little Saint James.?

Subscribe to get access

Read more of this content when you subscribe today.

thestealingofemily.co.uk