Martin Newbold
15 Valleside Road
Hastings, Ore Village
East Sussex TN35 5AD
United Kingdom

31st May 2025

Corporation Service Company (CSC)
211 E. 7th Street, Suite 620
Austin, TX 78701

Corp Legal
865 FM 1209, Building 2
Bastrop, TX 78602

To the Respondent (X Corp Legal),

Dear Respondent (X Corp Legal)

NOTICE OF CONTINUING OBSTRUCTION, CORPORATE NEGLIGENCE, AND INTENT TO AMEND COURT RECORDS

To the Respondents (X Corp Legal),

I write following receipt of official communications from the Court of Chancery of Delaware relating to the matter I raised against X Corp. This correspondence accompanies growing public revelations surrounding Mr Elon Musk’s erratic behaviour and chronic substance misuse while acting in both corporate and governmental capacities. These revelations have material bearing on your legal posture, and particularly on your deliberate failure to resolve my claim in good faith.

The New York Times now reports that Mr Musk has been routinely using ketamine, a known dissociative anaesthetic and animal tranquiliser, for prolonged periods—potentially up to 13 hours at a time. These episodes, in addition to his sleep, suggest that Mr Musk was intermittently incapacitated while directing the business operations of X Corp and participating in sensitive federal roles via the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).

Why this matters to you:

• The conduct of Mr Musk—as your de facto executive—may void liability protections otherwise afforded to directors and officers, especially where there is bad faith, gross negligence, or wilful contempt for fiduciary duty.
• X Corp’s failure to repair my defamed online identity, or to provide access to my account, cannot now be excused as mere “system error” or automation. The circumstances indicate oblique intent, strategic neglect, and corporate dysfunction under impaired leadership.
• Your contradictory support communications (see Case Ref: 61118341a94647348.1185111605 and HackerOne Report #3065988) expose X Corp’s lack of operational control and contempt for due process.
• Despite two registered letters, ten phone calls, and repeated efforts to use your platform’s forms and escalation process, you have left this matter in limbo for over three months, while simultaneously acknowledging and settling legal disputes with former President Donald Trump to the tune of $10 million.

Consider this your formal warning:

Unless you take immediate action to:

1. Reinstate full access to my account (@martin__newbold),
2. Formally retract defamatory labels placed on my public content, and
3. Provide a direct line of correspondence for legal follow-up,

I shall submit a supplemental declaration to the Delaware Court identifying this continued obstruction, along with evidence linking your misconduct to Mr Musk’s chemically influenced decision-making, potentially breaching state and federal regulatory obligations.

You may consider this a precursor to damages proceedings and a petition for injunctive relief.

Sincerely,
Mr Martin Newbold

Cite:

1. Musk drug use on campaign trail sparked concerns: Report

2. https://people.com/elon-musk-intense-drug-use-allegations-11745379

3. https://www.thedailybeast.com/white-house-refuses-to-come-clean-on-musk-drug-testing/
4. https://www.vanityfair.com/news/story/elon-musk-stint-in-politics-reportedly-fueled-by-drugs

• Understanding the Complexity of Peerage Revocation and NCA
• Corruption Investigations: IBAC’s Limitations Explained
• Child Trafficking Concerns and the EHCR
• Guide Series How to Report Child Abduction a complete Procedure
• Reinvestigating Child Exploitation Cases: Operation BeaconPort