Prepared for: Legal Review / International Oversight Bodies / Public Accountability Forums Subject: Allegations Regarding the Disappearance of Emily Newbold-Smith and Related Institutional Failures Date: [23rd May 2025]

---

I. INTRODUCTION

This legal briefing summarizes key issues, complaints, and allegations raised by Mr. Martin Newbold in relation to the disappearance of his daughter, Emily Newbold-Smith. The document references interactions with UK government bodies, ombudsman services, international authorities, and statutory frameworks.

---

II. SUMMARY OF CORRESPONDENCE & FOI REQUESTS

• Freedom of Information Request (Ref: FOI2025/08198): Submitted to the Cabinet Office on May 17, 2025, concerning issues of “oblique prorogation,” maladministration, and systemic safeguarding failures.
• No Response from Prime Minister’s Office: Multiple recorded delivery letters sent to the Prime Minister and Sir Keir Starmer regarding safeguarding concerns received no acknowledgement. Allegations include deliberate obstruction of scrutiny, maladministration, and violations of Sections 1.2, 1.3, and 1.5 of the Ministerial Code.

---

III. PHSO AND JURISDICTIONAL LIMITATIONS

• Response from William Moore (PHSO): Indicates the office cannot investigate complaints against local authorities or judges, nor obtain records from external organizations.
• Complaint by Martin Newbold: Asserts this constitutes a dereliction of duty, misleading redirection, and evasion of responsibility. Requests formal investigation into ministerial misconduct and systemic institutional failure.

---

IV. CHILD TRUST FUNDS (CTFs)

• Individual Case: Concerns raised about the disappearance of Emily’s CTF, now before the court.
• National Context: Connects Emily’s case to approximately 430,000 missing/mismanaged CTFs in the UK, implicating systemic data mishandling, financial misappropriation, and failures of fiduciary duty.
• Pending Legal Action: Mentions an ongoing case involving Nationwide Building Society.

---

V. STATE-SPONSORED CONCEALMENT & HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS

• Allegation: Removal and care arrangements for Emily, funded by the state under an allegedly unlawful order, amount to state-sponsored concealment.
• Human Rights: Claims breach of Article 8, European Convention on Human Rights (right to private and family life).

---

VI. SYSTEMIC FAILURES & PUBLIC INTEREST ISSUES

• Scope Beyond Individual Case: Martin Newbold argues Emily’s case exemplifies broader systemic issues involving child welfare, missing public funds, and institutional negligence.
• Call for Inquiry: Urges the establishment of a statutory body or public inquiry to address failures in child safeguarding, FOI transparency, and data protection.

---

VII. IBAC, OPERATION DUNHAM, & CROSS-BORDER CORRUPTION

• IBAC Complaint (Victoria, AU): Seeks evidence from Operation Dunham regarding former education official Matthew Dunkley, referencing a phone-tapped conversation about destruction of evidence.
• Link to UK Cases: Asserts relevance to Emily’s case and similar crimes in the UK.
• Legal Barriers: Notes that FOI requests to IBAC were rejected for failing to meet administrative standards (e.g., Section 17 and Section 61B(1)(b) of the FOI Act).

---

VIII. MINISTERIAL CODE VIOLATIONS

• Sections Cited:
  • 1.2: Duty of ministers to uphold the highest standards of propriety.
  • 1.3: Obligation to give accurate and truthful information to Parliament.
  • 1.5: Ministers must be accountable to Parliament for their decisions and actions.

---

IX. RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Immediate Response Required: The Prime Minister’s Office and Cabinet Office must issue a formal response to Mr. Newbold’s letters and FOI request.
2. Referral to Parliamentary Committees: Recommend oversight by the Joint Committee on Human Rights and the Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee.
3. Investigation into CTF Mismanagement: Independent inquiry or audit by the National Audit Office and HM Treasury.
4. International Cooperation: Encourage evidence-sharing between UK and Australian authorities under the Five Eyes agreement.
5. Public Inquiry Consideration: Consider convening a statutory inquiry into child protection, institutional accountability, and transparency in both England and Northern Ireland.

---

Prepared by: [Martin Newbold] On behalf of: [The Stealing Of Emily] Contact: [1424430373]