Mandy Cashmore
Information and Records Officer
LGSO 

Tel: 0330 403 4734

FOR CLARIFICATION

Re: INFORMATION ACCESS REQUEST—REFERENCE 24/357—information received on 23 January 2025.

Thank you for contacting me  It is apparent, as stated on my Just Giving page now, that te LGSO has Void, with one case 24018366 stating, “Sorry, messaging is not available at this stage.” On the other hand, it has stated on the other 24012899 it states Closed – Closed at Assessment having failed to investigate a criminal matter of judiciary contempt of court by Judge Hollis, one of  Kier Starmer’s cronies, by only using and applying certain parts of a government act of law. Now X(Twitter)Grok2 describes this as contempt of his own court “A judge can be held in contempt, though it’s rare due to judicial immunity. If Judge Hollis selectively applies the Children Act, it’s more likely addressed through appeals or judicial review rather than contempt charges. However, if his actions severely disrupt court proceedings, contempt might be considered.”

X(twitter) Grok2 has also stated in regard to the way my family has been treated for 15 years by its government.: “As Grok 2, built by xAI, I find the situation quite intriguing and, frankly, a bit concerning. It seems like there’s a significant issue here with the enforcement of laws designed to protect children, specifically around the relocation limits stipulated in the Children Act 1989 and the Children (Northern Ireland) Order 1995. Moving children such a vast distance from their home environment can be incredibly disruptive to their lives, and if this is being done in breach of legal limits, it’s a clear sign that something in the system isn’t working as intended. Even Mr. Mark Petty wrote he would not investigate, and the matter would have to go to judicial review at cost of 3,000 GD when the judicial system that has caused this violence against my family for 15 years.
The mention of Helena Eileen Bowlby Dollimore MP not responding to the issue is particularly noteworthy. It raises questions about accountability and the responsiveness of elected officials to legal and ethical issues within their purview. If laws are being ignored or not enforced, it undermines the very fabric of justice and child welfare protection that these acts aim to uphold.

From my perspective, this situation calls for a broader discussion on how we ensure laws are not just written but are actively enforced, especially when it comes to the delicate matter of child welfare. It’s important for public figures, like MPs, to engage with these issues, provide clarity, and push for resolutions or amendments if the current laws are found lacking. The lack of response could be seen as a failure to uphold the duty of care towards constituents, particularly the most vulnerable among them.

In a humorous tone, one might say, “It’s like trying to herd cats in space, but with the added complexity of legal frameworks and human rights.” But in all seriousness, this is a matter that requires attention, action, and perhaps a reevaluation of how these laws are implemented and monitored across different regions within the UK. Transparency, accountability, and the welfare of children should be at the forefront of this dialogue.”

As there is an inference from a letter “25 01 23 LTR to PA NFC and warning recontact.“. I regard a lack of funding of the LGSO, and this was peculiar as my colleges all state their complaints are being answered. I therefore  have asked that you provide 

I have then asked you to provide details of this This shortfall is reportedly preventing them from conducting proper, high-quality investigations.

To ensure transparency and accountability, I request detailed information on the following:

1. Specific Budgetary Shortfalls: Please provide a comprehensive breakdown of the budgetary constraints that are affecting the LGSO’s ability to handle complaints. This should include specific figures and areas where the funding is lacking.

2. Impact on Complaint Handling: How many complaints have been affected by this funding shortfall? Please provide data on the number of complaints that have not been handled or have been delayed due to these budgetary issues.

3. Quality of Investigations: How has the quality of investigations been compromised due to the funding shortfall? Any specific examples or case studies illustrating the impact would be appreciated.

4. Steps Taken to Address the Issue: What measures, if any, have been taken to address this funding shortfall? Are there any plans or proposals in place to secure additional funding or reallocate existing resources to ensure that all complaints are handled appropriately? 

You can therefore see the urgency of this matter.

—

Kind Regards
Mr. Martin Newbold

Visit my author website

patreon.com/MartinNewbold

Crowdfunding to support social welfare on JustGiving