Urgent Statement Regarding Gross Misapplication of Law and the Improper Relocation of Child Emily

Subject: Perjury, Misconduct, and Potential Violations of Constitutional Rights
CC: Graeme Biggar, NCA; Pauline Smith; Ms. Kapourelakos; Local Government Ombudsman
References: 19567481NFRC240506650607 | NFRC241207046189 | Action Fraud Case 8872649 | IBAC CASE-2024684

Dear Sally Domingo-Jones (School Govenor) , East Sussex (A Local Authority/Council),

Can a judge be held guilty of contempt of court? The Supreme Court has clarified that fair criticism of the judiciary as a whole or the conduct of a judge in particular may not amount to contempt, provided it is made in good faith and in the public interest. Given this, if Judge Hollis selectively applied parts of the Children Act, could he be in contempt of his own court?

Grok Conversation / X

It seems that as you have placed this unlawful position upon me and my family
you must provide a legal resolution at your earliest convenience not in 15 years as you neglected. 

The recording was required to see that proper handling of the matters was represented and reported deal as you have not been able to provide these assurances to me I am forced to request a proper investigation

By the way of publicly announcing  Law Misapplication: The Case of Emily’s Relocation   requirement for prosecution People requiring conviction – thestealingofemily.co.uk  and providing reasons Law Misapplication: The Case of Emily’s Relocation – thestealingofemily.co.uk

I write to raise grave concerns regarding perjury committed by an individual who was neither a Crown servant nor an employee of a Crown servant. It is unacceptable that such a person has been allowed to manipulate legal proceedings, including the improper act of telephoning a case. These actions represent a clear violation of constitutional rights and an abuse of process, undermining the integrity of justice.

For a matter concerning children’s welfare to remain unresolved for 15 years is egregious. The lack of transparency and restricted access to crucial communications is deeply concerning. I demand an immediate investigation into these breaches and insist that all relevant documents and communications be made fully accessible without restriction.

Where is your duty of care in this matter which is without current lawful remedy or redress? It appears unconstitutional for you not to provide this relief when you have sworn on oath. Redress and Remedy are guaranteed and integral.

—

Kind Regards
Mr. Martin Newbold

Visit my author website

patreon.com/MartinNewbold

Crowdfunding to support social welfare on JustGiving