Subject: Acknowledgment and Further Clarification – FOI 4463 and FOI 4445 – Children and Families Truth Commission Report Launch

Information Compliance Team 

House of Lords 

Dear Mr. Fisher,

I last contacted you on December 30th regarding FOI 4463 and FOI 4445. Unfortunately, I have yet to receive the requested information about security footage concerning women’s safety within an external room of the House of Commons. This footage would confirm whether adequate measures were in place to protect women in this environment.

The lack of a response suggests a significant oversight in security provisions, particularly following the tragic murder of Sir David Amess on October 15, 2021. I would have expected compliance with GDPR and the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) in providing this information. If security measures were indeed absent, this poses a severe hazard that must be addressed.

Serious Concerns Regarding My Daughter’s Case

Separately, I am raising urgent concerns about the disappearance of my daughter in 2016 and systemic failures by East Sussex County Council (ESCC), Southern Health and Social Care Trust, and others. Key points include:

1. Placement with Unrelated Families:
   • My daughter was allegedly placed with unrelated families without adhering to legal adoption protocols. This was facilitated by Matthew Dunkley, former Director of ESCC Children’s Services, and Christine Elizabeth Stirling, a former social worker.
   • Records show discrepancies in official documentation, such as BMD reference BCS 290747 issued on September 26, 2023, which matches the details of Lauren Louise Peters. This suggests fraudulent alteration of records.
2. Legal Violations:
   • The placement of siblings with unrelated families violated several laws, including the Children Act 1989, Section 22C(9)(b), and the Children (Northern Ireland) Order 1995, Article 27.
   • Social worker Christine Stirling incorrectly identified Gerard Keenan as Lauren’s father, despite evidence to the contrary, and facilitated her relocation to Northern Ireland. DNA evidence proving Daniel Cunningham is Lauren’s father has been ignored.
3. Fabricated and Destroyed Records:
   • Documents, including a fabricated genogram dated August 19, 2010, and the viability assessment conducted by Christine Stirling on August 27, 2010, contradict existing evidence and court orders.
   • Matthew Dunkley has a documented history of record destruction during his tenure in Victoria, Australia, as investigated under Operation Dunham by IBAC.
4. Failure to Investigate and Respond:
   • Southern Health and Social Care Trust failed to act on DNA evidence or respond to data protection requests, breaching Section 10 of the Data Protection Act.
   • NICCY did not investigate despite repeated submissions, neglecting its role in safeguarding children.
5. Emotional and Financial Harm:
   • These failures have caused severe emotional distress, psychological trauma, and financial loss to my family, including mishandling of my daughter’s trust fund.

Questions for Investigation

To resolve these grave issues, I request an investigation into the following:

1. Placement and Adoption Procedures:
   • Why was my daughter placed with unrelated families without proper adoption protocols?
   • Were these placements legally sanctioned, and who approved them?
2. Data Handling and Record-Keeping:
   • Why were records related to my daughter’s case, including DNA evidence and data protection requests, not appropriately processed or responded to?
   • What actions will be taken to rectify the fraudulent alterations to my daughter’s records?
3. Accountability:
   • What measures will be taken to hold individuals accountable for these violations?
   • How will systemic failures within ESCC and other involved organizations be addressed?
4. Reparations and Resolution:
   • What steps will be taken to provide reparations for the harm caused to my family?
   • How will my parental rights and my daughter’s welfare be restored?

Conclusion

I trust that you will treat this matter with the urgency it deserves and ensure compliance with legal and ethical obligations. Failure to address these issues would constitute a continued violation of my family’s rights under Articles 6, 8, and 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights, as well as the Fraud Act 2006, Section 2.

I look forward to your prompt response.

Yours sincerely,

Visit my author website