Data Protection Team

Customer Services and Information Governance Officer
Communities, Economy and Transport Department
East Sussex County Council

Resolver ref: RES5205297
18th November 2024

Dear Anita Cundall, Customer Services Manager,

You seem to be providing untrue statements based on Social Workers made -up lies. As already advised in communications to the council, the individual in America, namely C.M provided detailed accounts of being asked to fabricate reports to “sex them up” and make them more compelling. This account is corroborated by an article from Ted Jeory in the Daily Mail, published at 00:00 on Sunday, December 11, 2011, which reveals that social workers are regularly “sexing up” dossiers on problem parents to remove children into care and even to farm them out for adoption.

Additionally, the Social Services genogram presented shows incorrect family groupings, failing to accurately represent the facts surrounding child L’s background. It does not take into account that L was not born in Northern Ireland. L is the result of a relationship between her mother and Mr. Cunningham, and as such, she has a brother and sister who are part of her family dynamic. Furthermore, Newry Children’s Protection Services made efforts to notify authorities in Reading, England, to inform them that child L and her mother had relocated to Northern Ireland. This important information regarding L’s familial background and the notification to Reading should have been carefully considered and reflected in the genogram. It was not as the local authority was to busy sexing up reports!

The lack of accuracy in these reports and the failure to reflect the full context of L’s background are deeply concerning and require further attention to the detail, which you seem to be devoid of.

It also seems that my daughter Emily’s social media feeds ceased in 2016 when she went officially missing.

Secondly, I point out deliberate lawbreaking in relation the Gross Negligence in Care Orders Emily and L were relocated approximately 500 miles away in breach of, violating legal limits that state children should not be moved more than 50 miles from their home. The legal requirement, as stipulated under the Children Act 1989, Section 22C(9)(b), and the Children (Northern Ireland) Order 1995, Article 27, states that a child should not be moved more than 50 miles from their parental home.and the large-scale adoption of children and confront the tragic history of 9,000 deaths in Ireland’s church-run institutions. Our examination reveals a deeply troubling legacy marked by systemic neglect and abuse. The high mortality rates and the harsh conditions faced by children in these institutions reflect a historical pattern of exploitation and disregard for the welfare of vulnerable populations of 8000 children taken into care per year.

I look forward to your response regarding the ongoing investigation into the recent fraudulent transaction and the disparity in how fraud cases are being handled.

It seems that an investigation into ECHR breaches has not been allowed, despite advice from Peter Skinner, MEP, to pursue this matter further. Given the gravity of these breaches, I believe this should be escalated to the relevant authorities.

As I mentioned in previous correspondence, there have been potential breaches of the European Convention on Human Rights, including:

• The right to a fair trial (Article 6)
• The right to respect for private and family life (Article 8)
• The prohibition of discrimination (Article 14)

Given the context and the issues raised, I believe these matters should be fully examined in light of the advice from Peter Skinner, MEP.

Please confirm whether the situation will be reviewed with this in mind and provide an update on the steps being taken.

Kind regards,
Martin Newbold