Re: CAS-7983833-X1C1C9

Police Reference: 50239746-2024
Subject: Inquiry Regarding Operation Dunham and the Ultranet Scandal

Action Fraud Case: 8872649, NFRC241207046189
Serious Fraud Office References: c98c91180d570dc [Official], 5e118dc08da84da [Official]
ICO Complaint Reference: IC-337307-W2B4

---

Dear Ikenna

I write to escalate my concerns regarding the ongoing issues relating to Operation Dunham, the Ultranet Scandal, and serious breaches of legal and ethical obligations. including reports Social workers ‘sex up abuse claims to snatch children for adoption’ | UK | News | Express.co.uk

As part of my case, I submitted DNA evidence to Northern Ireland (SA010831060GB) in connection with a Subject Access Request (Ref: 19567481). However, I have yet to receive any proof that my daughter was ever present in Northern Ireland or any details about the handling of her data. This matter has also been included in the LGO Case 24012899 and HCR Strasbourg Cases 5043, 4939, 4943, 4881, 4920, 4873, 4882, 4889, 4867—pertaining to financial fraud and DEFAULT notices served to the Local Authority regarding Habeas Corpus Requests.

Failures in Engagement and Transparency

1. NICCY Complaint (NICCY09-24.01): Despite sending 18 recorded letters, NICCY has failed to respond or meet with my daughter Emily.
2. NSPCC Case Reference (A-2695622): The NSPCC has remained silent on this case.

This ongoing lack of engagement demonstrates an alarming agenda—one that appears rooted in commercial interests, Malthusian principles, and divisive tactics akin to those outlined by Yuri Bezmenov. These actions prioritize the protection of the Trust’s commercial assets at the expense of family well-being, as evidenced by a telephone transcription I previously submitted.

Human Rights Violations

During a recent meeting, Mrs. Pearson failed to provide any evidence that my daughter, Emily, is alive and well. When offered the opportunity to facilitate her attendance, this was denied—a clear violation of Human Rights and the ECHR. Discussing such matters in her absence raises serious concerns, particularly if there is reason to believe she may be deceased. Despite the 72-hour obligation for investigation in such cases, several months have now passed with no apparent murder investigation undertaken.

Furthermore, my daughter’s trust account has been unlawfully removed without transparency or justification, as raised in Complaint NBS8165809 and via Resolver.RES10964672.

Evidence from the Truth Commission Report

The Truth Commission of Birmingham University, presented at the House of Lords on December 15, 2024, documented widespread violations of fundamental rights across families, including:

Violation of Article 8 (Right to Respect for Private and Family Life):

• 93% of families did not receive requested support from local authorities.
• 90% were denied support for issues that led to their child’s removal.
• 94% reported unjust restrictions or denials of contact with their children.

Violation of Article 6 (Right to a Fair and Public Hearing):

• 69% felt their legal representation was neither fair, supportive, nor independent.
• 62% were denied access to the documents used to justify child removals.
• 82% believed courts failed to consider all available evidence.

Violation of Article 14 (Right to Protection from Discrimination):

• 67% reported mental health was unjustly used against their parenting ability.
• Discrimination stemmed from complaints made against services (73%), mental health concerns (54%), financial situation (36%), and social background (39%).

One statement from the report encapsulates the systemic failure:

“My child died, I asked for help, and they took all my other children away.”

You can read this report online here.

Call to Action

I urge relevant authorities, including the BBC, to thoroughly investigate and publicly report on these matters, as they impact countless families across the country. This is not only a profound issue of justice and human rights but also a matter of urgent public interest.

I trust that you will address these concerns with the gravity they deserve and respond promptly with appropriate action.

—

Kind Regards
Mr. Martin Newbold