I wrote 11th and 12th November 2024 to the investigator who had been assigned to my police complaint and ten other parties under references ) Helen Dollimore MP ( No reference given); East Sussex County Council, John Web Legal East Sussex Reference 19567481, 19890574, 19890574,19567481, 15938249, IC-340906-C7G6, IC-337307-W2B4; CVONI ( No reference given); European Union EHCR Reference cases: 4867, 4889, 4882, 4873, and the remaining open case 4920 NICCY NICCY09-24.01; LGO : Case ID 24012899; Legal Team , TOF-2032-2024 ( ref: 18971405); Private Office NI; Newry Court House 50239746-2024; International Criminal Court, Oude Waalsdorperweg 10, 2597 AK, The Hague The Netherlands, Tel: +31 (0)70 515 8515 who had all failed to provide me with report in respect to my daughter’s welfare because of the alleged heinous crimes and violence that they had afforded to my family unjustly. This communication served as a formal request for an update regarding my missing daughter, Emily Newbold Smith (DOB: 30/10), under the above-referenced case numbers. This also enclosed a letter from East Sussex Councilor  Keith Glazier who stated:

“In September 2024, the Cabinet considered an exceptional report that set out the acute and growing financial challenge that the Council faces: RPPR Update Report.pdf.  The report reflected that a combination of national cost pressures and increasing demand for local services, particular with Children’s and Adult Social Care, is putting the sustainability of the essential services we provide to all our residents at risk.“

This message is placed on public record, as previously submitted, and I am seeking information on any progress made in the investigation. Could you please inform me of the steps that have been taken to date? My daughter remains missing, and the situation is of the utmost concern. Please find attached a letter previously sent via Signed For Delivery (Ref: SA 0609 9679 5GB). I await your response.

Please find attached a letter previously sent via Signed For Delivery (Ref: SA 0609 9679 5GB). I await your response.

Date: 12th November 2024
Mr. Ikenna Okorie
Police Ombudsman for Northern Ireland
St. Anne’s Court
81 Chichester Street
Belfast
BT1 4JB

Dear Mr. Okorie,
Re: Reference Number 50239746-2024

I hope this letter finds you well. This communication is placed on public record which I submitted regarding Missing Daughter Emily Newbold Smith DOB 30/10. Could you please
provide me with an update on the progress of the investigation and any steps that have been
taken so far?

I have expected the ICO to act on my information requests on East Sussex County Council instead of Hiding behind tribunal in cases IC-340906-C7G6 stating under IC-340906-C7G6 stating on the 11 November 2024in respect to ESCC, IC-255415-V5N6 and C256137-B8Q5.”We have searched our records based on the information you provided. We are unable to locate the personal data you have requested.” It appears they no longer have
arguments.

This is compounded by NI Direct action in regard to its inability to process complaints for
more than 14 Local Authority due to its communication role under GDPR any perceived handling of complaint where it shared personal data would breach this act and therefore halt the investigation of any government agency in Northern Ireland I have been pursuing East Sussex for 14 years due to its crimes concerning children and its Children Director that stem from his criminal actions in Victoria Australia which have been part of Geelong IBAC investigation It is disclosed in taped recordings that this director has previously actively destroyed documents in breach of sections of data processing act.

The allocation of ESCC £50 million in public funds—set to rise to £80 million for services that
are evidently “not fit for purpose”—is a gross mismanagement of resources. Instead of improving the lives of children, these funds are being funnelled into a broken system, one that prioritizes self-preservation over child protection. This demands immediate investigation and redirection of resources to stop further harm. In fact, Kieth Glazier has stated in his communication to me Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 10:03 AM : In September 2024, the
Cabinet considered an exceptional report that set out the acute and growing financial challenge that the Council faces: RPPR Update Report.pdf. The report reflected that a combination of national cost pressures and increasing demand for local services, particular with Children’s and Adult Social Care, is putting the sustainability of the essential services we provide to all our residents at risk. In presenting a budget deficit of £55.3m in 2025/26 rising to £83.6m by 2027/28, the Cabinet agreed the next steps to be taken in response to the deteriorating situation. This included starting public consultation on a range of proposed savings within Adult Social Care (ASC) and Community, Economy and Transport
(CET).

Additionally, ESCC’s allocation of £50 million in public funds, expected to rise to £80 million,
is funding a system that remains “not fit for purpose.” This considerable budget allocation continues to fuel a broken system that appears more focused on self-preservation than the welfare of children. This requires urgent scrutiny, as these resources could be redirected to genuinely protective and supportive services. Destruction of evidence and manipulation of social work reports, coupled with unlawful placements of children far from familial ties, show an undeniable culture of corruption. NI Direct and East Sussex are failing in their statutory and moral obligations to protect vulnerable children, instead perpetuating a system that is actively harming them.

Yours Sincerely

Martin Newbold

Attachments

1. Letter from ICO
2. Letter from Kieth Glazier
3. Communication to your Office 11th November 2024

Attachment

Date: 11th November 2024

Mr. Ikenna Okorie
Police Ombudsman for Northern Ireland
St. Anne’s Court
81 Chichester Street
Belfast
BT1 4JB

Dear Mr. Okorie,
Re: Reference Number 50239746-2024

I hope this letter finds you well.I am writing to follow up on the complaint referenced above, which I submitted regarding Missing Daugter Emily Newbold Smith DOB 30/10. Could you please provide me with an update on the progress of the investigation and any steps that have been taken so far? I state on the record that my daughter is still missing and has not been located since I last wrote to you on September 23, 2024. Despite my ongoing efforts to locate her, I have not received any new information regarding her whereabouts. This remains an urgent matter, and I would appreciate your assistance in ensuring that all necessary steps are being taken to resolve this situation. She went missing in 2017 from an address in Newry. No one has provided me any details of what transpired after that date to her that appear genuine. In addition, I would like to inquire about the impact of my ongoing complaints to the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR). Specifically, I have made five separate complaints related to this case and would appreciate clarification on how these proceedings may be influencing or intersecting with your investigation. These complaints include the ongoing review of the following cases: 4867, 4889, 4882, 4873, and the remaining open case 4920. These cases are central to the broader issues I wish to address, and I kindly request that they be considered in the context of the issues raised below. Furthermore, I would like to bring your attention to a recent development: The Children and Families Truth Commission (CFTC) has released a preview of its first report, which has been endorsed by the University of Birmingham. The report investigates systemic flaws within the UK’s child welfare and family law systems, particularly in how the current court processes may fail to adequately protect children and families. It highlights concerns regarding cases where the rights of children and families are compromised in legal situations, and it advocates for a cultural shift in how children’s voices are heard and prioritized in family court decisions. This repository contains my own case, listed as item 35 in the complaint. The Commission’s findings align with ongoing concerns regarding transparency, accountability, and the need for significant reforms in family law practices, particularly in relation to safeguarding the well-being of children in custody disputes and family proceedings.

For more details on the Commission’s findings and recommendations, I encourage you to
read the full report here: Children and Families Truth Commission’s First Report [1].

Please do not hesitate to contact me should you require any additional information to assist in your review of this case. I would be grateful for your timely response regarding the next steps and anticipated timeline for resolution.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Yours sincerely,

Mr. Martin Newbold

[1] Preview of the Children and Families Truth Commission’s first report, endorsed by the University of Birmingham | Researching Reform

Recent posts

• November 4, 2024 Preview of the Children and Families Truth Commission’s first report, endorsed by the University of Birmingham | Researching Reform
• November 3, 2024 Formal Claim of Negligence and Request for International Review and ‘Wrongful’ Separation under Regulation 26 Serious harm
• November 2, 2024 Investigation into Complaint Against Police
• October 30,2024 Communication from Kieth Glazier
• October 19,2024 The Pursuit of Truth and Justice in the Face of Adversity
• October 17,2024 Writ of Habeas Corpus and Writ of Attachment.
• October 15,2024The Hidden Costs of Care: Council Debt and the Impact on Children’s Services
• October 12,2024 Understanding Habeas Corpus and Child Custody Cases
• October 4,2024 Malpractice in Child Welfare: A Father’s Plea for Justice
• October 1,2024 Default Notice and Notice of Serious Misconduct
• October 1, 2024 Addressing NICCY: Negligence in Welfare Cases of Children
• September 19, 2024 Fraud Allegations Against HHJ Watkins: Key Insights
• September 18, 2024 “Can I sue a Judge?”
• September 6, 2024Challenges in Data Protection and Stakeholder Engagement at Southern Regional College
• March 26, 2024THE STEALING OF EMILY – Closed Material Procedures (‘secret courts’).
• September 6, 2024Potential Criminal Concerns at Southern Regional College: Need for Investigation
• September 6, 2024Urgent Assistance Needed: Resolving Data Protection and Stakeholder Engagement Issues at Southern Regional College
• June 23, 2023 Urgent reforms needed to protect women and children from violence in custody battles: UN expert | OHCHR

Everyone is asking on twitter: “Can I sue a Judge?”

Yes, you can in very slim circumstances If a judge creates a court order based on that fraudulent affidavit, the judge has also committed a felony. Anyone attempting to enforce an illegal court order is, in effect, committing an act of violence against you.

What is an affidavit: a written statement confirmed by oath or affirmation, for use as evidence in court.

If these articles have impacted you, please be courageous and comment on the page. If you have faced legal frustrations, consider adding your case to those who feel the system is broken. Please note that this is on a secure server and requires validation data, which will be compared with the Family man database to ensure submissions can be verified. Do not hold back your emotions; this situation is truly horrific and evil. If you are not seeing the survey below this might mean you need to try a different Internet browser:

The Stealing of Emily – Review of cases for illegal Separation. | Crowdsignal.com (survey)