8th November 2024

In an era when transparency and justice are increasingly called for in child protection and family law, the dismissal of my cases by the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) without investigation has been a painful reminder of the systemic failures so many families face. My cases—4867, 4889, 4882, and 4873—were closed with the explanation that similar requests had already been examined, even though these decisions reflect unresolved violations of fundamental rights.

This response from the ECHR came on 06/11/2024 at 13:53, denying me and countless others the right to a fair, thorough review. My case, documented as Survey Response 34 submitted on 5/8/2024 at 7:33 am, reflects the experiences of many families who participated in the Children and Families Truth Commission survey. This commission, supported by the University of Birmingham, has taken a bold step in revealing the often hidden injustices of our family law system and was recently presented to the House of Lords.

Findings from the Truth Commission Report

The Truth Commission’s report, which consolidates testimonies from families nationwide, highlights deep-rooted violations within the child protection system. These findings resonate with my experience and bring to light violations of key human rights:

1. Violation of Article 8 (Respect for Private and Family Life)
The Commission’s findings on Article 8 violations reveal that an alarming number of families felt their private and family lives were unjustly invaded:

• 93% of families, including mine, reported not receiving the support they asked for from local authorities or other services.
• 90% were not offered help for the issues that led to their child’s removal.
• 94% of families faced unjust restrictions or denials in contact with their children.
• 86% were not informed about the right to apply for post-adoption contact.

2. Violation of Article 6 (Right to a Fair Trial)
The right to a fair hearing remains a cornerstone of justice, yet many families experienced a legal process that was anything but fair:

• 69% said their legal representation was inadequate, unsupportive, or biased.
• 62% were denied access to documents and evidence that influenced the decision to remove their child.
• 82% reported that critical information was omitted from the court’s deliberation.

3. Violation of Article 14 (Protection from Discrimination)
The Commission found that discriminatory practices impacted decisions affecting families and children:

• 67% of families had their mental health used against them in assessments of their ability to care for their child.
• 93% experienced unfair or discriminatory treatment from child welfare professionals. For some, this discrimination stemmed from mental health status (54%), financial situation (36%), disability (35%), or gender (34%).

One parent shared the traumatic experience that underscores the emotional toll of these practices: “My child died, I asked for help, and they took all my other children away.”

Seeking Justice and Reconsideration

These findings make it clear that systemic change is urgently needed. My case represents just one story within this overwhelming data, yet it mirrors the distress experienced by so many. I call upon the ECHR to reconsider the dismissal of cases like mine—cases where families’ rights to fair treatment, privacy, and protection from discrimination have been sidelined by a system that is often more punitive than protective.

The voices documented by the Truth Commission are powerful, and I am grateful for their report’s courageous insight into these systemic issues. But reports alone are not enough. Meaningful reform and accountability must follow if justice is to prevail for families across Europe.

For anyone reading this who has faced similar injustices, please know that your story matters. We must continue to demand transparency, compassion, and fairness in a system that should protect, not harm, the families it serves.

Page #1

Page #2

Page #3

Attachment(s)

• #### Read Me First ####.pdf  (72.25 KB)
• 2024-05-08 Survey Response 34 -Screen Dumps 6 M.pdf  (805.77 KB)
• Page 1 – The Stealing of Emily – Review of cases for illegal Separation.pdf  (110.89 KB)
• Preview of the Children and Families Tr…ity of Birmingham _ Researching Reform.pdf  (238.18 KB)
• The Children and Families Truth Commission.pdf  (88.67 KB)

Recent posts

• November 3, 2024 Formal Claim of Negligence and Request for International Review and ‘Wrongful’ Separation under Regulation 26 Serious harm
• November 2, 2024 Investigation into Complaint Against Police
• October 19,2024 The Pursuit of Truth and Justice in the Face of Adversity
• October 17,2024 Writ of Habeas Corpus and Writ of Attachment.
• October 15,2024The Hidden Costs of Care: Council Debt and the Impact on Children’s Services
• October 12,2024 Understanding Habeas Corpus and Child Custody Cases
• October 4,2024 Malpractice in Child Welfare: A Father’s Plea for Justice
• October 1,2024 Default Notice and Notice of Serious Misconduct
• October 1, 2024 Addressing NICCY: Negligence in Welfare Cases of Children
• September 19, 2024 Fraud Allegations Against HHJ Watkins: Key Insights
• September 18, 2024 “Can I sue a Judge?”
• September 6, 2024Challenges in Data Protection and Stakeholder Engagement at Southern Regional College
• March 26, 2024THE STEALING OF EMILY – Closed Material Procedures (‘secret courts’).
• September 6, 2024Potential Criminal Concerns at Southern Regional College: Need for Investigation
• September 6, 2024Urgent Assistance Needed: Resolving Data Protection and Stakeholder Engagement Issues at Southern Regional College

Everyone is asking on twitter: “Can I sue a Judge?”

Yes, you can in very slim circumstances If a judge creates a court order based on that fraudulent affidavit, the judge has also committed a felony. Anyone attempting to enforce an illegal court order is, in effect, committing an act of violence against you.

What is an affidavit: a written statement confirmed by oath or affirmation, for use as evidence in court.

If these articles have impacted you, please be courageous and comment on the page. If you have faced legal frustrations, consider adding your case to those who feel the system is broken. Please note that this is on a secure server and requires validation data, which will be compared with the Family man database to ensure submissions can be verified. Do not hold back your emotions; this situation is truly horrific and evil. If you are not seeing the survey below this might mean you need to try a different Internet browser:

The Stealing of Emily – Review of cases for illegal Separation. | Crowdsignal.com (survey)