East Sussex County Council 

01273 482913

eastsussex.gov.uk

Subject: Re: Subject Access Request Ref 19567481 (Classified as Complex)

2024 November 4th

Subject access request (ref: 19567481)

My References 

 EHCR Section 46 and Rule 39 Formal Claim of Negligence and Request for International Review and ‘Wrongful’ Separation (Ref: TOF-2032-2024) (Ref: 18971405) (Case ID: 24012899) ECHR: 4867,4873,4882,4889  

---

Dear Customer Services and Information Governance Team,

2024-11-05

I am writing to bring attention to concerning allegations about unethical practices in family court proceedings, particularly the “sexing up” of social work reports and the use of what is now being referred to as “Toxic Court Procedures.” These practices reportedly involve manipulating reports to create false narratives, undermining the fair treatment of families within the judicial system.

Significant evidence has surfaced regarding former senior social services official Matt Dunkley, who was under investigation by the Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission (IBAC) in Victoria, Australia. In a recorded phone call, Dunkley allegedly admitted to his associate that the destruction and alteration of documents were common practices in his role. Such revelations raise serious concerns about the influence of these practices on family court cases, both historically and potentially in current proceedings.

In addition, there are extensive breaches of conduct in Northern Ireland that reinforce the pattern of deceptive practices and fabricated allegations in family court. These breaches appear to validate the existence of “Toxic Court Procedures,” and  “Institutional Fraud” where biased or inflated evidence is used to influence court decisions unjustly. Such practices violate the principles of integrity, transparency, and accountability that are essential to the judicial process.

This letter serves as a formal request for an investigation into the alleged misuse of power within social services and family courts, as well as into the systemic issues that allow such Toxic Court Procedures to persist. Ensuring that family court cases are evaluated on factual evidence without manipulation is essential for upholding public trust in the judicial system.

I have been submitting a formal claim regarding alleged negligence, wrongful separation, and procedural misconduct under Section 46 and Rule 39 of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR). This claim seeks an immediate international review into the actions leading to the separation of my daughter and myself, as well as related issues of negligence that have had significant, unjust effects on our family. 

These actions have taken place under a series of questionable procedures, further exacerbated by inadequate safeguarding practices and adherence to justice protocols.

Claim Summary and Background

The basis of this claim involves wrongful separation and negligence stemming from actions by public authorities that have directly compromised my daughter’s safety and well-being. The attached references (TOF-2032-2024, Ref: 18971405, Case ID: 24012899) outline the specific incidents and related claims.

Notably, the ECHR references 4867, 4873, 4882, and 4889 highlight issues around accountability failures, transparency deficits, and procedural injustices within the family court systems and social services, specifically in both England and Northern Ireland. The gravity of these failings, which involve “toxic court procedures” and questionable interventions by social services, has undermined our right to family life as guaranteed under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

Grounds for Claim

This formal claim emphasizes the following core issues:

1. Negligence and Lack of Duty of Care: Despite my repeated attempts to alert authorities to the potential risks and harm my daughter has faced, there has been a sustained failure to take appropriate and lawful protective measures.
2. Wrongful Separation and Procedural Violations: The wrongful separation of my daughter from our family has occurred under unjust, and potentially unlawful, circumstances. The lack of adequate oversight and review mechanisms has resulted in a situation where our rights to family life and fair treatment have been severely compromised.
3. Request for International Review: Due to the pervasive and systemic nature of these failings, I am formally requesting an international review of this case. I urge the Committee of Ministers to monitor and assess compliance with the decisions relating to human rights obligations to prevent irreparable harm and to ensure accountability.

Action Requested

In light of the outlined issues, I am requesting:

1. Immediate protective measures under Rule 39 to prevent further harm and to address the risks posed to my daughter due to the identified negligence.
2. An international review and intervention under Section 46 to assess the handling of our case, given the severity of procedural misconduct and the apparent neglect by relevant authorities.

I trust that the European Court of Human Rights will give due consideration to this claim and provide guidance on the next steps to ensure a just and fair resolution.

Thank you for your attention to this urgent matter. I look forward to your response and any updates on actions taken regarding this claim.

Thank you for your attention to these urgent matters, and I look forward to hearing how these concerns will be addressed.

Kind Regards
Mr. Martin Newbold

Recent posts

• November 3, 2024 Formal Claim of Negligence and Request for International Review and ‘Wrongful’ Separation under Regulation 26 Serious harm
• November 2, 2024 Investigation into Complaint Against Police
• October 19,2024 The Pursuit of Truth and Justice in the Face of Adversity
• October 17,2024 Writ of Habeas Corpus and Writ of Attachment.
• October 15,2024The Hidden Costs of Care: Council Debt and the Impact on Children’s Services
• October 12,2024 Understanding Habeas Corpus and Child Custody Cases
• October 4,2024 Malpractice in Child Welfare: A Father’s Plea for Justice
• October 1,2024 Default Notice and Notice of Serious Misconduct
• October 1, 2024 Addressing NICCY: Negligence in Welfare Cases of Children
• September 19, 2024 Fraud Allegations Against HHJ Watkins: Key Insights
• September 18, 2024 “Can I sue a Judge?”
• September 6, 2024Challenges in Data Protection and Stakeholder Engagement at Southern Regional College
• March 26, 2024THE STEALING OF EMILY – Closed Material Procedures (‘secret courts’).
• September 6, 2024Potential Criminal Concerns at Southern Regional College: Need for Investigation
• September 6, 2024Urgent Assistance Needed: Resolving Data Protection and Stakeholder Engagement Issues at Southern Regional College

Everyone is asking on twitter: “Can I sue a Judge?”

Yes, you can in very slim circumstances If a judge creates a court order based on that fraudulent affidavit, the judge has also committed a felony. Anyone attempting to enforce an illegal court order is, in effect, committing an act of violence against you.

What is an affidavit: a written statement confirmed by oath or affirmation, for use as evidence in court.

If these articles have impacted you, please be courageous and comment on the page. If you have faced legal frustrations, consider adding your case to those who feel the system is broken. Please note that this is on a secure server and requires validation data, which will be compared with the Family man database to ensure submissions can be verified. Do not hold back your emotions; this situation is truly horrific and evil. If you are not seeing the survey below this might mean you need to try a different Internet browser:

The Stealing of Emily – Review of cases for illegal Separation. | Crowdsignal.com (survey)