3rd November 2024

Introduction

Today, I have served this writ in connection with The Stealing of Emily, underscoring ongoing human rights abuses, violations of due process, and systemic failings within the family court system that have adversely affected the welfare of my child and infringed on our rights. Attached to this submission is the directive from Mr. Peter Skinner, MEP, who has recognized the urgency of these issues and advocated for their consideration by the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR). Mr. Skinner’s support highlights the serious and widespread implications of these injustices, urging immediate examination at the international level.

Grounds for Complaint

1. Rights Violations and Systemic Failings:
   • Procedural Injustices: I have documented multiple procedural irregularities throughout my case, as discussed in The Stealing of Emily, specifically concerning Closed Material Procedures (CMPs) and ex parte hearings. These practices obstruct transparency and violate the core principles of a fair trial under Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
   • Data Protection and Privacy Breaches: The mishandling of personal data by authorities contravenes GDPR standards and breaches the right to privacy (Article 8). Despite these breaches, authorities have failed to address or rectify the impact on myself and my family.
2. Denial of Effective Remedy and Exhaustion of Domestic Remedies:
   • I have exhausted all possible domestic avenues, yet the failure to provide transparent, fair hearings continues to prevent justice. Domestic courts have repeatedly upheld CMPs, despite their misuse, which limits any effective remedy and supports systemic rights violations.

Relief Sought

• Acknowledgment of Rights Violations: A formal acknowledgment from the ECHR of the procedural and rights violations experienced due to CMPs, data mishandling, and lack of transparency.
• Mandate for Systemic Reform: A call for reforms in the use of CMPs in family court cases, emphasizing transparency, and accountability.
• Just Compensation and Protective Measures: Compensation for the harms endured and enforceable measures to ensure the safeguarding of data and privacy rights in future cases.

Conclusion

By submitting this writ, I seek to bring to light not only the personal injustices suffered but also the broader, ongoing issues within the family court system. Mr. Skinner’s guidance underscores the importance of addressing these systemic problems at the ECHR level to secure justice and prevent further violations of human rights.

Page #1

Page #2

Page #3

Page #4

Attachment(s)

• #####READ ME FIRST #####.pdf  (144.52 KB)
• 12-02-14 – Letter from Peter Skinner MEP EHCR would apply in your case.pdf  (800.13 KB)
• 2010-05-11 -SOTRI at Banbridge PNSI Station with Emilys sococial work appointed carer to a criminal.pdf  (5.64 MB)
• 2019-01-17 communbication with Dr Zappone – in respect to situation with GRONI.pdf  (735.82 KB)
• 2019-01-17 communication with Darren Newberry GRO – FOR FAST TRACKING.pdf  (1.52 MB)
• 2019-01-18 communication to Dr Zappone in regard to human rights.pdf  (445.38 KB)
• 2019-02-05 – communication with Dr katherine Zappone.pdf  (814.88 KB)
• 2019-02-05 – complaint to Europa.pdf  (590.89 KB)
• 2019-03-11_Instrument.pdf  (80.77 KB)
• 2019-10-19 – Email – RE_ Our Earlier Telephone Conversation 20 August 2019.pdf  (152.24 KB)
• 2021-12-09-Ministerial Communications Department SF7239 0874 2GB.pdf  (220.75 KB)
• 2022-07-13 – letter from Anne Dennison re Emily.pdf  (306.82 KB)
• blogbook-pBXajSywOu-2024.pdf  (29.69 MB)

Recent posts

• October 19,2024 The Pursuit of Truth and Justice in the Face of Adversity
• October 17,2024 Writ of Habeas Corpus and Writ of Attachment.
• October 15,2024The Hidden Costs of Care: Council Debt and the Impact on Children’s Services
• October 12,2024 Understanding Habeas Corpus and Child Custody Cases
• October 4,2024 Malpractice in Child Welfare: A Father’s Plea for Justice
• October 1,2024 Default Notice and Notice of Serious Misconduct
• October 1, 2024 Addressing NICCY: Negligence in Welfare Cases of Children
• September 19, 2024 Fraud Allegations Against HHJ Watkins: Key Insights
• September 18, 2024 “Can I sue a Judge?”
• September 6, 2024Challenges in Data Protection and Stakeholder Engagement at Southern Regional College
• March 26, 2024THE STEALING OF EMILY – Closed Material Procedures (‘secret courts’).
• September 6, 2024Potential Criminal Concerns at Southern Regional College: Need for Investigation
• September 6, 2024Urgent Assistance Needed: Resolving Data Protection and Stakeholder Engagement Issues at Southern Regional College

Everyone is asking on twitter: “Can I sue a Judge?”

Yes, you can in very slim circumstances If a judge creates a court order based on that fraudulent affidavit, the judge has also committed a felony. Anyone attempting to enforce an illegal court order is, in effect, committing an act of violence against you.

What is an affidavit: a written statement confirmed by oath or affirmation, for use as evidence in court.

If these articles have impacted you, please be courageous and comment on the page. If you have faced legal frustrations, consider adding your case to those who feel the system is broken. Please note that this is on a secure server and requires validation data, which will be compared with the Family man database to ensure submissions can be verified. Do not hold back your emotions; this situation is truly horrific and evil. If you are not seeing the survey below this might mean you need to try a different Internet browser:

The Stealing of Emily – Review of cases for illegal Separation. | Crowdsignal.com (survey)