thestealingofemily.co.uk

ECHR Response and Follow-up Correspondence

Published by

Martin Newbold

on

31-10-2024 In the ongoing efforts to secure transparency and safeguarding measures for my daughter, The Stealing of Emily has entered a critical phase involving international legal mechanisms. Following my recent appeal to the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) under Rule 39 for urgent safeguarding intervention, the ECHR responded with an acknowledgment of my case. However, they have declined to issue interim measures, noting that Rule 39 applies in circumstances where there is imminent risk of irreparable harm to a Convention right—typically where a clear threat to life or serious harm exists.

While acknowledging this outcome, my position underscores a significant concern regarding the safety and well-being of children placed in local authority care without parental access to medical histories or vital information. This response highlights the critical need for systemic change in safeguarding policies and greater accountability for cases involving vulnerable minors.

To strengthen this effort, my follow-up letter to the ECHR presents a detailed comparison to other high-profile cases of child welfare concerns, including the Madeleine McCann case. This case, much like my own, demonstrates the severe impact of missing information, poor documentation, and insufficient safeguarding measures for children in protective care. Moreover, recent guidance by social workers in Northern Ireland to report my daughter as a missing person, while necessary, has yet to yield the transparency and security assurances that such a situation warrants.

Included Attachments

In support of my application and correspondence with the ECHR, I have included two crucial resources on The Stealing of Emily website, which outline the gravity and broader implications of these legal and safeguarding challenges:

  1. Lucy Letby Case: Legal Implications on Emily’s Case and Family Rights
    This document draws parallels between recent legal cases exposing systemic safeguarding flaws in healthcare settings, illustrating the potential risks my daughter faces and the urgent need for reform in the handling of children’s records and welfare in care settings.
  2. Navigating the ECHR Application Process: My Step-by-Step Guide to Submitting a Case
    A comprehensive guide that details the procedural requirements, key considerations, and documentation strategies for presenting urgent matters to the ECHR. This is intended to aid other families facing similar obstacles in navigating complex international legal channels.

These resources are accessible at www.thestealingofemily.co.uk and provide further insight into both the specific case details and broader implications for child safeguarding rights under international law.

Through these continued efforts, The Stealing of Emily advocates for enhanced transparency, a fair representation of parents’ rights, and urgent improvements in safeguarding practices for all children placed in care. I have also included

Page

Page

Attachment(s)

Recent posts

Everyone is asking on twitter: “Can I sue a Judge?”

Yes, you can in very slim circumstances If a judge creates a court order based on that fraudulent affidavit, the judge has also committed a felony. Anyone attempting to enforce an illegal court order is, in effect, committing an act of violence against you.

What is an affidavit: a written statement confirmed by oath or affirmation, for use as evidence in court.

If these articles have impacted you, please be courageous and comment on the page. If you have faced legal frustrations, consider adding your case to those who feel the system is broken. Please note that this is on a secure server and requires validation data, which will be compared with the Family man database to ensure submissions can be verified. Do not hold back your emotions; this situation is truly horrific and evil. If you are not seeing the survey below this might mean you need to try a different Internet browser:

The Stealing of Emily – Review of cases for illegal Separation. | Crowdsignal.com (survey)

Subscribe

Leave a comment

Previous Post
Next Post

ACT NOW:

Help us turn this into a Drama:
https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/stealing-of-emily

Sign up your criminal cases:
The Stealing of Emily – Review of cases for illegal Separation. | Crowdsignal.com (survey.fm)

Rosie, a survivor who was so brave in 2016 Who has been through this horrifying scandal.

👉To access and complete the new survey , please visit: PFAN Parent and Carer Survey.👈

Please Choose ‘User’ fields to add additional information.

HOW TO REPORT TRAFFICKING TO THE UNITED NATIONS

Recent posts

Updates

Gods children are not for sale

Class action needed 500 plus cases to bring Truth justice and accountability for our children in the corrupt care system. Anyone who remembers the England Post Office Horizon scandal will know we need 500+ names to get A class, collective or group action is a claim in which the court awards permission to an individual or individuals to bring similarly placed claims in a single case. Collective actions are an efficient way of dealing where there are a huge number of claimants suing a large corporation or social services under a similar set of facts.

  • This is why we all stood strong and fought for all our children.
  • Now the only consideration must be to They came for our Children and they are FINISHED.
  • We do not want a Generation without Mothers and Fathers.

thestealingofemily.co.uk

About

A passionate site carrying news stories about the surrounding matters of child abuse abduction which has accounted for more that 500,000 children abused in our care system taken far away from their parents more than 200 miles.

Topics

Follow Us

Blog at WordPress.com.