Southern Health and Social Care Trust
Directorate of Children and Young People’s Services

27th October 2024

CC: PRIVATE OFFICE NI GOVERNMENT.
CC: Patients Client Council ( NIDirect) 0800 9170222.
CC: East Sussex County Council, Phyllis Allward.
CC: Legal Team Niccy.
CC: Olga McCoy NI LGO.
CC: Lost Contact.

Subject:  Misprision of Treason.

Dear Assistant Director Carolin Doyle,

I am deeply disappointed by the lack of empathy and accountability displayed in your letter dated October 10th. It is evident that you are unaware of my daughter’s precise whereabouts, even though she remains under the responsibility of your organization. This lack of awareness suggests the absence of an effective protocol or structured mandate within your services. The frequent turnover of interim directors within your department should signal the need for a thorough review of your operational practices. Furthermore, I note that your letter did not include a return address or reference, a basic step that would facilitate meaningful engagement.

You also referenced “inappropriate language,” a claim based on hearsay despite this being our first communication. All my correspondence is prepared through AI assistance to ensure clarity and professionalism. This baseless accusation reflects the lack of truthful engagement I have come to associate with your organization.

I would point out the criticisms of my books, the Stealing of Emily have stated 

“The Stealing of Emily series has garnered critical acclaim for its chilling narrative, often compared to a retelling of Huckleberry Finn with a more sinister twist. This comparison emphasizes its exploration of themes such as innocence lost against a backdrop of societal and systemic corruption. Described as “chilling” and “brutal,” the series appeals to readers drawn to darker, more challenging themes. It delves into the less trodden paths of legal and judicial systems, focusing on their profound impact on individuals—particularly children. This niche yet significant exploration carries considerable emotional and political weight, inviting readers to confront uncomfortable truths about justice and its real-world implications.”

• The Children Act 1989, Section 22C(9)(b), which clearly stipulates that children in care must be placed within 50 miles of their home.
• The Children (Northern Ireland) Order 1995, Article 27, which similarly emphasizes the importance of keeping children within close proximity to their home when in care.
• Furthermore, I would point out the case of McMeel v Gissing-McMeel | [2022] EWHC 1448 (Fam), which underscores the implications of judicial conduct based on fraudulent actions. This case highlights how the misuse of fraudulent affidavits can lead to significant legal ramifications for the judicial system and those involved in enforcement actions. For more insights, please refer to my article on this case: Fraud Allegations Against HHJ Watkins: Key Insights.
• Any individual attempting to enforce an illegal or fraudulent court order is committing an unlawful act. Such actions can be construed as acts of violence against those affected, as enforcing a void order has no legal standing and violates the rights of those involved. It is crucial that these issues are addressed immediately to prevent further harm.

During the sole LAC meeting held in over a decade, your team assured me that my daughter was thriving, learning to sing, training for a hospitality role, and enjoying regular visits. However, I have since learned that children under the care of the Southern Health and Social Care Trust, including my daughter, are at times placed at Woodlands Juvenile Justice Centre (JJC), a secure facility with an annual cost comparable to elite private boarding schools. When I contacted the Woodlands Juvenile Centre directly on October 26th, I was informed that my daughter had not been there for four days. This prompted me to seek additional guidance.

I initially reached out to the emergency social services helpline, where an advisor named Ashley informed me that no specific protocol existed for addressing missing persons under the emergency social worker’s role. Ashley advised contacting the police, who in turn redirected me back to social services. This circular response demonstrated a complete lack of cohesion among agencies, leading to critical delays that could have otherwise been used to ensure my daughter’s safety.

To expedite matters, I filed a missing person report with Sussex Police (reference number 519 26102024) and Northern Ireland Police (reference number 50239746-2024) in the hope it might prompt more direct action. When I informed Northern Ireland Social Workers of this step, I received additional conflicting guidance, leaving me uncertain of agency responsibilities.

This experience has highlighted a serious lack of coordination and accountability, particularly in cases involving missing individuals under the care of multiple agencies. Such a fragmented response not only hinders effective resolution but also places unnecessary emotional strain on families during already distressing circumstances. When vulnerable individuals go missing, there should be an urgent, unified approach across all relevant agencies. My experience, however, has shown a distinct lack of such coordination.

 I have written to express my deep concerns regarding NI Direct’s role in managing complaints related to public services in Northern Ireland, particularly in light of serious legal issues affecting families like Emily’s case. Emily’s situation underscores significant shortcomings within the child welfare and family law systems, with allegations of legal breaches, including failures to adhere to child protection and safeguarding laws. In a recent interaction with NI Direct on October 22, 2024, I learned that information provided by the public is retained within NI Direct and not shared with relevant third-party organizations. This approach is troubling, especially in child welfare cases where timely, accurate communication is essential. When individuals contact NI Direct seeking assistance, they expect their concerns to be conveyed to the appropriate authorities, ensuring that issues are heard and acted upon. The current model, where only aggregated data is shared, risks reducing NI Direct’s function to that of a call center, often leaving individuals feeling unheard and without  

I am formally requesting clarification on the established protocols for managing missing persons when multiple agencies are involved. Additionally, I seek guidance on the steps I should take to address this matter effectively, along with assurances that my concerns will be taken seriously. I hope this letter prompts a reconsideration of current processes to prevent other families from facing similar distressing challenges.

Finally, I must ask why, despite repeated requests over the past 12 years, I still do not have confirmation of my daughter’s whereabouts, especially in light of her mother’s passing and the ongoing uncertainty surrounding her welfare. I urge your organization to address this lack of transparency and ensure proper care and accountability moving forward.
 

There has been no mention of the Writ of Habeas Corpas 

October 13, 12:29 PM – Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Writ of Attachment
October 13, 9:45 AM – Subject Access Request (ref: 19567481) Habeas Corpus Ad Judice
October 12, 5:18 PM – Request for Statement of Service Under Criminal Procedure Rules and Information on Children Taken into Care
October 12, 3:51 PM – Request for Statement of Service Under Family Procedure Rules 2010 Rule 6.7
October 12, 10:41 AM – Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Judice

Or the subsequent Subject access request (ref: 19567481) Habeus Corpus Ad Judice

Kind regards,
Mr. Martin Newbold

Recent posts

• October 19,2024 The Pursuit of Truth and Justice in the Face of Adversity
• October 17,2024 Writ of Habeas Corpus and Writ of Attachment.
• October 15,2024The Hidden Costs of Care: Council Debt and the Impact on Children’s Services
• October 12,2024 Understanding Habeas Corpus and Child Custody Cases
• October 4,2024 Malpractice in Child Welfare: A Father’s Plea for Justice
• October 1,2024 Default Notice and Notice of Serious Misconduct
• October 1, 2024 Addressing NICCY: Negligence in Welfare Cases of Children
• September 19, 2024 Fraud Allegations Against HHJ Watkins: Key Insights
• September 18, 2024 “Can I sue a Judge?”
• September 6, 2024Challenges in Data Protection and Stakeholder Engagement at Southern Regional College
• March 26, 2024THE STEALING OF EMILY – Closed Material Procedures (‘secret courts’).
• September 6, 2024Potential Criminal Concerns at Southern Regional College: Need for Investigation
• September 6, 2024Urgent Assistance Needed: Resolving Data Protection and Stakeholder Engagement Issues at Southern Regional College

Everyone is asking on twitter: “Can I sue a Judge?”

Yes, you can in very slim circumstances If a judge creates a court order based on that fraudulent affidavit, the judge has also committed a felony. Anyone attempting to enforce an illegal court order is, in effect, committing an act of violence against you.

What is an affidavit: a written statement confirmed by oath or affirmation, for use as evidence in court.

If these articles have impacted you, please be courageous and comment on the page. If you have faced legal frustrations, consider adding your case to those who feel the system is broken. Please note that this is on a secure server and requires validation data, which will be compared with the Family man database to ensure submissions can be verified. Do not hold back your emotions; this situation is truly horrific and evil. If you are not seeing the survey below this might mean you need to try a different Internet browser:

The Stealing of Emily – Review of cases for illegal Separation. | Crowdsignal.com (survey)