26th October 2024

On October 26th, I contacted the Woodlands Juvenile Centre at 028 9185 5600, hoping to confirm my daughter’s presence and well-being, only to be informed that she had not been there for four days. This initial information raised immediate concerns, and the absence of clear guidance left me uncertain about the appropriate next steps. Seeking further support, I reached out to the emergency social services helpline at 0800 197 995, where I spoke with an advisor named Ashley. I explained the situation, expecting to be directed toward a protocol or action plan for cases involving missing persons who have been absent for several days, especially under circumstances where multiple agencies may be involved.

To my surprise, Ashley informed me that there was no specific protocol in place addressing cases like mine in relation to the Emergency Social Worker’s role. Ashley advised that responsibility for such situations would lie with the Woodlands Juvenile Centre and suggested that I contact the police directly via their 101 service. Following her advice, I immediately reached out to 101. However, when I spoke with the police, I was informed that the responsibility actually falls to a social worker, as social services are mandated to manage cases of missing individuals, particularly when there are safeguarding concerns. This conflict in guidance from different agencies ultimately created a circular argument: each party redirected me back to the other, leaving my daughter’s case without a single agency willing to take ownership or provide actionable support.

The circular argument underscored a systemic breakdown in communication, leaving me without any immediate assistance in an urgent situation. As a result, critical time was lost that could have been used to locate and ensure my daughter’s safety. This experience has highlighted an apparent lack of coordination between social services, the police, and juvenile facilities, each pointing to the other as responsible, yet none taking decisive action to address the issue. The disconnect between these agencies, especially when managing vulnerable individuals, reveals a troubling gap in accountability that can leave parents and guardians unsupported and without guidance in times of crisis.

Realizing that the initial response provided no clear resolution, I then took further action by contacting Sussex Police, where I filed a separate report under reference number 519 26102024, in the hope that this would prompt more concrete support. I subsequently relayed this information to Northern Ireland Social Workers upon calling 0800 197 995 again, hoping that this additional step would encourage a cohesive response from the agencies involved. Despite these repeated attempts to engage multiple agencies, I remain faced with conflicting information and a lack of clarity regarding who is ultimately responsible.

The experience has demonstrated a concerning lack of established protocols, particularly when dealing with cases involving missing persons who may be under the care or supervision of multiple agencies. This fragmented approach not only hinders a timely and effective response but also places unnecessary emotional strain on families who are already facing distressing circumstances. In cases where vulnerable individuals are missing, the urgency of the matter should naturally call for a unified response across all relevant agencies, yet my experience has shown that this is far from the reality.

I am seeking clarification on the official protocols governing missing persons in circumstances such as these, where multiple agencies are involved but none appear willing to take ownership. Additionally, I would greatly appreciate any guidance on the specific steps I should take to address this matter effectively, as well as assurances that my concerns will be taken seriously and that measures will be implemented to prevent similar issues in the future.

This breakdown in responsibility is not only unacceptable but deeply unsettling. The lack of a cohesive, accountable protocol risks compromising the safety and welfare of those who are most vulnerable. I hope that by bringing this situation to your attention, necessary changes will be considered to ensure that such procedural gaps are addressed and that families like mine can rely on a coordinated, timely response in the future.

Recent posts

• October 19,2024 The Pursuit of Truth and Justice in the Face of Adversity
• October 17,2024 Writ of Habeas Corpus and Writ of Attachment.
• October 15,2024The Hidden Costs of Care: Council Debt and the Impact on Children’s Services
• October 12,2024 Understanding Habeas Corpus and Child Custody Cases
• October 4,2024 Malpractice in Child Welfare: A Father’s Plea for Justice
• October 1,2024 Default Notice and Notice of Serious Misconduct
• October 1, 2024 Addressing NICCY: Negligence in Welfare Cases of Children
• September 19, 2024 Fraud Allegations Against HHJ Watkins: Key Insights
• September 18, 2024 “Can I sue a Judge?”
• September 6, 2024Challenges in Data Protection and Stakeholder Engagement at Southern Regional College
• March 26, 2024THE STEALING OF EMILY – Closed Material Procedures (‘secret courts’).
• September 6, 2024Potential Criminal Concerns at Southern Regional College: Need for Investigation
• September 6, 2024Urgent Assistance Needed: Resolving Data Protection and Stakeholder Engagement Issues at Southern Regional College

Everyone is asking on twitter: “Can I sue a Judge?”

Yes, you can in very slim circumstances If a judge creates a court order based on that fraudulent affidavit, the judge has also committed a felony. Anyone attempting to enforce an illegal court order is, in effect, committing an act of violence against you.

What is an affidavit: a written statement confirmed by oath or affirmation, for use as evidence in court.

If these articles have impacted you, please be courageous and comment on the page. If you have faced legal frustrations, consider adding your case to those who feel the system is broken. Please note that this is on a secure server and requires validation data, which will be compared with the Family man database to ensure submissions can be verified. Do not hold back your emotions; this situation is truly horrific and evil. If you are not seeing the survey below this might mean you need to try a different Internet browser:

The Stealing of Emily – Review of cases for illegal Separation. | Crowdsignal.com (survey)