24th October 2024

Yesterday I received an official warning from the manager of Transport and Economy which she wanted to inform me was an official warning and that they would not answer my calls or requests for information because they needed my ID and permission from my daughter Emily who legally at the time of serving this legal request for information was still a child.

I challenge everyone involved to state exactly what everyone’s role and remit is as it appears to date there is no legal team engaged in the ESCC letter However Anita Cundall has expressed legal overtones making it a double entendre that I am being informed not to write to the legal team when there is no legal team statement of fact of them being involved in the first place. She then threatens the legal team’s involvement if I continue lodging my complaints. Can you please elaborate on the two legal teams and their remit? How can the customer services manager try to slap my wrist? When this is addressed as a legal matter.

They are setting fire to everything I send. The customer services team is stating it has nothing to do with the legal team why is she promoting a legal matter to me regarding a warning threatening legal action? She does not appear legally trained or have legal status?

East Sussex County Council, County
Hall, Lewes BN7 1UE
Customer Relations Team 0345 60 80 192 23rd October 2024
Anita Cundall
Customer Services Manager Customer Services Team, Communities, Economy and
Transport

Dear Sir/Madam
Thank you for your letter dated October 21, 2024. I appreciate your concerns; however,
I must address several points you raised. It is crucial to highlight that my concerns,
particularly regarding my daughter—who is turning 18 on October 30 and is currently in
a foreign land without any family support—do not seem to have been taken into account.
This situation has compounded the seriousness of her status as a missing person in the
context of devolution in Northern Ireland.

Email Correspondence: You mentioned that I sent approximately 20 emails
between October 2 and October 21, 2024, including 7 to Legal Services. Could you
please specify which emails you responded to? To date, I have not received a
single reply. You are aware these emails fall within an ongoing Information Case,
as your legal team has yet to address my inquiries.

1. Letters to Legal Team: Regarding the seven letters sent to your legal team
   concerning Habeas Corpus and application requests, these letters included a
   request for mediation to reach an amicable solution. This mediation has not been
   provided to date. From your response, I trust you are waiving that right?
2. Information Request (Ref 19567481): Concerning the identification requested, I
   will provide the necessary documents attached to this communication, even
   though you already have this information on file. Perhaps if you had been
   informed, as I have, that my daughter’s mother’s ashes were destroyed after being
   left at the funeral director for six months without notification to any family
   member, you would understand my urgency. Additionally, requests for the
   transcript of the Coroner—of which I was once an interested party but now am
   not—remain unaddressed. Without this information, which should have been
   provided by the social worker who has since left, I cannot proceed.
3. Historical Complaints: While I do not agree with your decision regarding handling
   historical complaints, I have already cited your legal remedy available to you to
   reopen any case of public interest concern. It appears this has now been denied.
4. Ongoing Complaints: Moving forward, I would like to remind you of my request
   under reference 19695605 regarding the “Definition and Legal Framework of
   Modern Slavery.” I have opened a substantial complaint with the Ombudsman

about the alleged misuse of public funds, and an investigator has been assigned
to this case. This complaint includes access to my website in full, which raises
significant concerns regarding compliance.

I take your warning seriously and hope my concerns are taken to heart as well. To move
forward constructively, I would appreciate it if you could provide me with the exact
paragraphs from these letters that you find offensive. This will allow me to address any
perceived wrongdoing and adjust my communication accordingly. As you have not
supplied these letters in your information request, there is little to discuss, as it may be
evident that you have no legal team.

Moreover, on a clerical note, please be aware that my letters are not solely produced by
me; I have not been the sole creator of these communications for some time.
In addition, I would like to draw attention to the ongoing failures within the family court
system that have impacted my family. A father with no history of abuse—backed by an
enhanced Disclosure (Ref: 0011722800649)—comes from a family with a legacy of
integrity, having served honourably in the war and demonstrated resilience throughout.
The mother, though never harmful to her children, tragically passed away. Her mental
health deteriorated after being neglected and unsupported during her time in Borstal by
@EastSussexCC, who wrongfully removed her children.
Family Court’s Solution:

“Let’s place the children with someone else who is not biologically related; we can forge
the birth certificates. Let’s alter the reports to fit our agenda and violate the 50-mile law
in all children’s acts. Ultimately, we will leave these children to be neglected by the
Northern Ireland Local Authority, who then loses track of them.”

@EastSussexCC is now facing a staggering debt of £55 million, projected to rise to £80
million in two years, primarily due to the costs associated with Looked After Children
(LAC) care. TUSLA and the Irish Times have reported that the care provided is far from
adequate.

The absurdity of this logic is staggering. We must expose these failures and advocate for
change.

Moving forward, I will direct all future communications to the designated inboxes to
avoid confusion. Please note that I will be sharing this correspondence with the LGO as
part of their ongoing investigation. Can you please provide my complaint reference in
your response?

Sincerely,
Martin Newbold

Recent posts

• October 19,2024 The Pursuit of Truth and Justice in the Face of Adversity
• October 17,2024 Writ of Habeas Corpus and Writ of Attachment.
• October 15,2024The Hidden Costs of Care: Council Debt and the Impact on Children’s Services
• October 12,2024 Understanding Habeas Corpus and Child Custody Cases
• October 4,2024 Malpractice in Child Welfare: A Father’s Plea for Justice
• October 1,2024 Default Notice and Notice of Serious Misconduct
• October 1, 2024 Addressing NICCY: Negligence in Welfare Cases of Children
• September 19, 2024 Fraud Allegations Against HHJ Watkins: Key Insights
• September 18, 2024 “Can I sue a Judge?”
• September 6, 2024Challenges in Data Protection and Stakeholder Engagement at Southern Regional College
• March 26, 2024THE STEALING OF EMILY – Closed Material Procedures (‘secret courts’).
• September 6, 2024Potential Criminal Concerns at Southern Regional College: Need for Investigation
• September 6, 2024Urgent Assistance Needed: Resolving Data Protection and Stakeholder Engagement Issues at Southern Regional College

Everyone is asking on twitter: “Can I sue a Judge?”

Yes, you can in very slim circumstances If a judge creates a court order based on that fraudulent affidavit, the judge has also committed a felony. Anyone attempting to enforce an illegal court order is, in effect, committing an act of violence against you.

What is an affidavit: a written statement confirmed by oath or affirmation, for use as evidence in court.

If these articles have impacted you, please be courageous and comment on the page. If you have faced legal frustrations, consider adding your case to those who feel the system is broken. Please note that this is on a secure server and requires validation data, which will be compared with the Family man database to ensure submissions can be verified. Do not hold back your emotions; this situation is truly horrific and evil. If you are not seeing the survey below this might mean you need to try a different Internet browser:

The Stealing of Emily – Review of cases for illegal Separation. | Crowdsignal.com (survey)