Subject: Urgent: Lack of Disclosure Regarding Meeting with My Daughter
2024-09-20
Dear NICCY Legal Team,
I hope this email finds you well.
As Joanne is appearing to be always out of the office, she has advised that urgent matters be directed to your team.
Joanne McGurk’s out-of-office notifications:
- On September 19, 2024, Joanne McGurk stated: “I am out of the office until Monday, 23rd September, and will have limited access to my emails.”
- On September 16, 2024, Joanne McGurk stated: “I am out of the office until 27th August. If your matter is urgent, please forward it to .”
I have informed Joanne McGurk of the content of the TULSA and Irish Times documents, providing copies that state the Care System in Northern Ireland is Not Fit For Purpose.
I am writing regarding a matter of utmost urgency related to the toxic judicial proceedings involving my daughter’s case. I have previously communicated with Joanne McGurk about this issue, but as she is currently out of the office, I have been advised to forward urgent matters to your team.
The proceedings in question have had a severe and detrimental impact on my daughter, and I believe there is an immediate need for NICCY’s intervention to safeguard her welfare. Given the time-sensitive nature of this situation, I kindly request that my concerns be addressed without delay.
Lord Darzi’s Report, now published, concurs with the finding that nearly half a million children are in urgent need of mental health support. Yet, despite these alarming figures, the necessary provisions for mental health services have still not been observed.
Please find attached the relevant correspondence and documentation to provide context. I would appreciate an acknowledgment of receipt and confirmation that this matter will be escalated or assigned to someone who can assist.
I am also copying in Alex Tennant and Scott Robinson, who have been involved in previous communications about the case to which there has been no substantial reply.
I am writing to express my deep concern about the handling of my daughter’s case and NICCY’s role in protecting her rights. Despite over two months of communication, I have yet to be informed whether NICCY has met with my daughter. As her parent, I have a right to know if such a meeting has taken place, yet no disclosure has been made.
Additionally, there have been no case numbers provided or any identifying features to track the progress of this situation. This ongoing disregard of critical matters continues to implicate individuals in what could be perceived as criminal behavior.
How can NICCY claim to be protecting children’s rights when such a critical action has been withheld from me? This lack of transparency undermines NICCY’s purpose of advocating for the rights of children and young people in Northern Ireland.
Additionally, please find below the list of files I have previously sent to NICCY, which contain important context for this ongoing issue:
- 2024-08-27:
- [SENT] Email to Joanne McGurk regarding concerns about my daughter.
- [RESPONSE] Email from Joanne McGurk addressing my concerns.
- 2024-08-28:
- [SENT] Follow-up email to Joanne McGurk regarding the ongoing concerns.
- 2024-08-29:
- [SENT] Email to Joanne McGurk to clarify further concerns about my daughter.
- 2024-09-06:
- [RESPONSE] Emails related to the Commissioner for Victims of Crime Office and NICCY, including responses from the Childrens’ Commissioner.
- 2024-09-09:
- [RESPONSE] Email regarding a forwarded response from the Commissioner for Victims of Crime Office (CVOCNI).
- 2024-09-10:
- [RESPONSE] Patricia’s forwarded email from the Commissioner for Victims of Crime Office (CVOCNI).
- 2024-09-11:
- [RESPONSE] Email from Joanne McGurk addressing assertions related to my daughter, Emily.
- [SENT] Email to Graham Lorimer requesting deletion of a post regarding this issue.
- 2024-09-19 & 2024-09-24:
- [SENT] Emails to Alex Tennant and Scott Robinson concerning toxic judicial proceedings related to my daughter’s case.
I request an immediate clarification as to whether NICCY has met with my daughter and, if so, why this was not disclosed to me earlier. It is critical that I am kept informed about any developments regarding her welfare and the judicial proceedings.
I look forward to your prompt and detailed response.
Sincerely
Mr. Martin Newbold
Recent posts
- September 19, 2024 Judicial Accountability in Northern Ireland: A Call for Action
- September 19, 2024 Fraud Allegations Against HHJ Watkins: Key Insights
- September 18, 2024 “Can I sue a Judge?”
- September 6, 2024Challenges in Data Protection and Stakeholder Engagement at Southern Regional College
- March 26, 2024THE STEALING OF EMILY – Closed Material Procedures (‘secret courts’).
- September 6, 2024Potential Criminal Concerns at Southern Regional College: Need for Investigation
- September 6, 2024Urgent Assistance Needed: Resolving Data Protection and Stakeholder Engagement Issues at Southern Regional College
Everyone is asking on twitter: “Can I sue a Judge?”
Yes, you can in very slim circumstances If a judge creates a court order based on that fraudulent affidavit, the judge has also committed a felony. Anyone attempting to enforce an illegal court order is, in effect, committing an act of violence against you.
What is an affidavit: a written statement confirmed by oath or affirmation, for use as evidence in court.
If these articles have impacted you, please be courageous and comment on the page. If you have faced legal frustrations, consider adding your case to those who feel the system is broken. Please note that this is on a secure server and requires validation data, which will be compared with the Family man database to ensure submissions can be verified. Do not hold back your emotions; this situation is truly horrific and evil. If you are not seeing the survey below this might mean you need to try a different Internet browser:
The Stealing of Emily – Review of cases for illegal Separation. | Crowdsignal.com (survey)


Leave a comment