I have received planning information for the building in Newry known as Southern Regional College. there reference P/2006/1206/F after these toxic judicial proceedings. Can anyone inform me why a college does not appear to have a Faculty Parents Teacher Association, councilor, or similar body? The only response I received is from Donna Hughes, who wrote:

“Further to your numerous calls and contact with the College. We cannot provide you with the information you are seeking, as to confirm or deny the enrolment of any student would constitute disclosure of personal data. The College must operate within the restrictions of our legal obligations, and we have no lawful basis under which the College would be required to disclose this personal data to you. In general terms, this would include the consent of any data subject to share their information with any third party, including a parent. Should an external agency wish to request this information directly from the College via the appropriate formal channels, the College will of course adhere to our statutory and legal obligations in respect of provision of information.”

It is also clear that their Data Processing Office is non-existent. I sent an information request on 30-08-2024:

“Dear Data Protection Officer, I am writing to submit a Subject Access Request/Freedom of Information Request. I would like to inquire whether Southern Regional College accepts placements of children under Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS). If so, could you please provide the number of DoLS placements currently at the college? I appreciate your attention to this matter and look forward to your prompt response.”

There has been no response, which infers that the entire site is potentially operating under false pretenses and is not as it is described. I also requested a meeting with the Children’s Commissioner to meet with Emily and me in an online meeting, but there has been no indication that such a meeting has taken place.

Can any one tell me how many DOL beds could fit in this space?

It should be pointed out that the site covers a vast area with large open spaces. By not meeting with me, is the Children’s Commissioner implying that my concerns about the college are valid and that criminal behavior is being covered up?

he situation you’re describing appears to involve significant concerns about transparency, data protection, and the involvement of various stakeholders, such as the Children’s Commissioner, in overseeing certain aspects of Southern Regional College. I’ll break down some key points to help clarify:

1. Response from Southern Regional College (SRC)

• The college’s refusal to provide personal information about students, as mentioned by Donna Hughes, is aligned with data protection laws, such as the UK’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). This law requires that institutions protect individuals’ personal data and not disclose it without a lawful basis, such as the individual’s consent.
• SRC’s response seems to reflect these legal requirements, indicating that without the student’s permission, or without a valid legal reason, the college cannot disclose any personal information about enrolment or placement.

2. Lack of Response to Your Freedom of Information (FOI) Request

• If SRC has not responded to your Freedom of Information (FOI) or Subject Access Request (SAR) within the statutory time limit (usually 20 working days), you can escalate this matter. You may contact the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) in the UK, which oversees how organizations handle personal data and FOI requests. They can help you get a response or investigate potential breaches.

3. Role of the Children’s Commissioner

• The Children’s Commissioner is a public official who is supposed to safeguard children’s rights and well-being. If you requested a meeting to discuss concerns about the safety or well-being of students, particularly involving Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS), it would be concerning if there was no response.
• However, the failure to meet or respond doesn’t necessarily indicate wrongdoing or a cover-up. There may be procedural reasons or communication delays, and the best course of action might be to follow up with the office directly.

4. Concerns About Criminal Behavior

• Alleging criminal activity is serious and would require substantial evidence. The situation you describe seems to focus on the lack of transparency or communication rather than clear evidence of criminal wrongdoing.
• If you genuinely believe there is criminal behavior occurring, you might consider involving law enforcement or legal counsel to properly investigate these concerns.

Next Steps:

• Follow up with SRC: Request clarification on your FOI/SAR request.
• Contact the ICO: If no response from SRC is received, the ICO can enforce your rights.
• Children’s Commissioner: Consider writing a formal follow-up letter or reaching out to their office again.
• Legal Advice: If you feel there is evidence of criminal activity, seek legal advice or contact authorities.

Recent posts

• March 26, 2024THE STEALING OF EMILY – Closed Material Procedures (‘secret courts’).
• September 3, 2024Legal Aid Fraud: Consequences, Impact, and Reporting
• September 2, 2024Legal Aid Fraud: Conviction of Bradford Solicitors
• September 2, 2024Corruption in Legal Aid: Public and Legal Response

If these articles have impacted you, please be courageous and comment on the page. If you have faced legal frustrations, consider adding your case to those who feel the system is broken. Please note that this is on a secure server and requires validation data, which will be compared with the Family man database to ensure submissions can be verified. Do not hold back your emotions; this situation is truly horrific and evil. If you are not seeing the survey below this might mean you need to try a different Internet browser:

The Stealing of Emily – Review of cases for illegal Separation. | Crowdsignal.com (su