Follow the Money
Investigate Financial Flows: Use financial experts to trace the flow of money and uncover any corruption or misuse of funds. Exposing financial irregularities can be a strong lever for change.

Unfortunately, the involvement of large sums of money in any system can create powerful resistance to change. However, sustained efforts from a combination of these approaches can eventually lead to meaningful reform. It often takes time, persistence, and a strong coalition of concerned citizens, advocates, and leaders to overcome entrenched interests.

The calculation results in €165,000,000,000 (165 billion based on NSPCC briefing figures for Northern Ireland’s abducted 500,000 children). This figure represents a substantial amount of money, which underscores the immense financial scale of the situation you’re describing. When large sums like this are involved, it often becomes even more challenging to push for change, as those benefiting from the system have significant financial incentives to maintain it. ​

165 billion euros (€165,000,000,000). This immense sum of money highlights just how lucrative the system can be for those involved, which unfortunately can create strong resistance to any reforms or changes. When such vast amounts are at stake, it becomes even more critical to advocate for transparency, accountability, and ethical practices to ensure that the welfare of children is prioritized over profit.

The beneficiaries of such a system, where large sums of money are involved in the care of vulnerable children, can include a variety of entities and individuals:

1. Private Care Providers: Companies or organizations that run care facilities for children often receive significant government funding or contracts. These providers can sometimes prioritize profit over the quality of care, especially if they are not subject to rigorous oversight.
2. Government Agencies: Certain government agencies might benefit indirectly through budget allocations or the appearance of managing a large and complex system. In some cases, individuals within these agencies might benefit from maintaining relationships with private providers or from the bureaucratic power that comes with managing such large funds.
3. Pharmaceutical Companies: If children in care are being prescribed medications unnecessarily, pharmaceutical companies can profit from the sale of these drugs. This could be particularly concerning if there is an over-reliance on medication as a solution for behavioral or emotional issues rather than more holistic care.
4. Legal and Administrative Consultants: Those who are involved in the legal and administrative processes of managing care, including lawyers, consultants, and administrative staff, may also benefit financially from the complexity and scale of the system.
5. Corrupt Officials: In some cases, corrupt officials may exploit the system for personal gain, whether through kickbacks, contracts awarded to friends or family, or other forms of financial corruption.
6. Real Estate and Service Contractors: Companies providing services to care facilities, such as real estate, maintenance, and other operational needs, might also profit from lucrative contracts.

The key issue is that when the primary focus shifts from the well-being of the children to financial gain, the system becomes ripe for exploitation. This creates a cycle where those who profit have little incentive to push for reforms that would benefit the children, leading to ongoing neglect, abuse, and systemic failures.

If this article has impacted you, please be courageous and comment on the page. If you have faced legal frustrations, consider adding your case to those who feel the system is broken. Please note that this is on a secure server and requires validation data, which will be compared with the Family man database to ensure submissions can be verified. Do not hold back your emotions; this situation is truly horrific and evil. If you are not seeing the survey below this might mean you need to try a different Internet browser:

The Stealing of Emily – Review of cases for illegal Separation. | Crowdsignal.com (survey.fm)